On 05/07/2017 14:47, Garry Glendown wrote:
Hi,
Use exim instead of sendmail with an LDA or LMTP transport.
Also, not available in any of the standard or legacy packages of SLES 12
... I know why I stopped using SLES quite some time ago :(
It does seem to have Postfix though.
--
Jack.
a smart
one is zero.
BTW: I don't think this is on-topic for Dovecot - we seem to be
discussing mail-abuse abatement measures, which is a much more general
topic.
--
Jack.
acter. I am using
the dovecot deliver module and managesieve for my sieve stuff (dovecot
1.0.13). I am just wondering if this is the correct behaviour or if it
is a bug of sorts.
Cheers.
From,
Jack
ull)
[../pam_yubico.c:parse_cfg(779)] url=(null)
[../pam_yubico.c:parse_cfg(780)] capath=(null)
[../pam_yubico.c:parse_cfg(781)] token_id_length=12
[../pam_yubico.c:parse_cfg(782)] mode=client
[../pam_yubico.c:parse_cfg(783)] chalresp_path=(null)
[../pam_yubico.c:pam_sm_authent
Hello. From my understanding the 'autoexpunge' feature activates on
user disconnect.
But could you help me understand the 'doveadm expunge' feature better?
If a Maildir has 20 thousand messages and user is reading it over IMAP I
have a suspicion it is not a good idea to be rewriting the doveco
On Fri, 12 Aug 2022, Jack Cecil wrote:
could you help me understand the 'doveadm expunge' feature better?
If a Maildir has 20 thousand messages and user is reading it over IMAP
I have a suspicion it is not a good idea to be rewriting the dovecot
index and cache at the same time.
Christian Kivalo wrote:
What keeps you from testing with a test account
Hello. Even 10% of users having a problem that need to be hand held
through it in some way would blow up my schedule for other projects.
Aki Tuomi wrote:
Running doveadm expunge while user is logged in, is safe.
Tha
, a backup sql server will be
queried?
--
jack
string." is a
bit lacking in info when you think about the possibility of having a
different user/pass or dbname for the 2nd host instance.
I am going to play around with this on my production box... but having a
bit more info in the docs would be preferred.
- jack
On 8/30/22 07:
Hi Jos,
You're using IMAP.
Is in both mailclients the mailpath correctly configured?
Gr.,
Jack Raats
Op 06-11-2022 om 18:51 schreef Jos Chrispijn:
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: dovecot Namens gene heskett
Verzonden: Sunday, 6 November 2022 12:42
Aan: dovecot@dovecot.org
Onderwer
ponds to your
MySQL server version f
or the right syntax to use near
'??awakelunch.info??? AND active = 1' at line 1
I reckon the
failing of mysql inquiries just has to do with hackers trying to hack
me. The TLS problem isn't mission-critical since it's just getting
disabled.
[ro
mpact on what the
> solution is.
I have clients with their various domains hosted on my server to whom I need to
serve email. There will only be me on a slice of one machine interfacing with
dovecot/postfix. I have integrated/am integrating Amavis, ClamAV, Spamassassin,
PostfixAdmin and SquirrelMail.
Thanks,
Jack
Okay - fairly common setup. I don't use postfix-admin, but if that's
> what created your mysql tables that could also be a starting point to
> look for the table lock errors.
Ok. Thanks,
Jack
Wait a minute! PostfixAdmin has no problems with MySQL. They have a setup page
that verifies the MySQL connection among other things, and everything checks
out perfectly well.
At any rate, Simon, am now communicating with the Postfix list as well ;)
Thanks,
Jack
Hi;
[root@example jack]# /usr/local/sbin/dovecot --version
2.0.15
[root@example jack]# /usr/local/bin/doveconf -n
# 2.0.15: /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
doveconf: Warning: NOTE: You can get a new clean config file with: doveconf -n
> dovecot-new.conf
doveconf: Warning: Obsolete sett
veconf -n > dovcot-new.conf
command and the same conf file I've been using pops up. Can someone post some
code that reflects how the new conf file should look?
TIA,
Jack
From: Simon Brereton
To: Jack Fredrikson
Cc: "dovecot@dovecot.org"
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 2:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Temporary Failures
First up, apologies for double-posting. I actually posted this last one
yesterday and the othe
This is *only* a PS to my last response (e.g., please be sure to read last
response). Rob0 stated I should be using dovecot-lda. After running in circles
it appears that dovecot-lda is incorporated into dovecot proper any more and
I've duly incorporated it into my dovecot.conf file.
Jack
-userdb, dir owned by 0:0 mode=0755)
Oct 24 11:31:11 lda: Fatal: Internal error occurred. Refer to server log for
more information.
Every time I go to chmod 666 on that file, restarting dovecot wipes those
permissions. How fix?
Even when I fix that, I still get the "temporary failure".
Please advise.
TIA,
Jack
From: Tom Hendrikx
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Marathon Day 6 of First Install: MySQL Connection Problem
First up, thanks for the links, Simon, but they didn't help :( I still need to
chmod 666 /usr/local
:45 .
drwxr-xr-x 26 root root 4096 Oct 23 08:35 ..
/usr/sbin/usermod -a -G mail,postfix dovecot
And I'm still getting the same error:
dovecot: auth-worker: Error: mysql(localhost): Connect failed to database
(postfix): Access denied for user 'dovecot'@'localhost' (using password: YES)
TIA,
Jack
From: Tom Hendrikx
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 6:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Marathon Day 6 of First Install: MySQL Connection Problem
> Adding dovecot to the postfix group would be considered a security issue
> by many. Don't so this
path? It certainly isn't like that
> on my machine.
Well, I changed it to just "sendmail" (since I had that file, too) but with the
same result. I remember creating that file earlier but I don't remember where
and searching around my system I can't xargs grep it. What do you recommend?
TIA,
Jack
vecot/deliver-ldaTIA,
Jack
From: Jack Fredrikson
To: "simon.brere...@buongiorno.com" ; Dovecot
Mailing List
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 6:47 AM
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Marathon Day 6 of First Install: MySQL Connection Problem
Or, conversely, how do I create this file:
discovered it in /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver which, of
course, is a binary. How did it get there? Certainly not when I did my
./configure make make install dance with dovecot's src distro. How did it get
there?? How do I change it??`
TIA,
Jack
From: Giles Coochey
To: Jack Fredrikson
Cc: "simon.brere...@buongiorno.com" ; Dovecot
Mailing List
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 10:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Marathon Day 6 of First Install: MySQL Connection Problem
> On my Centos 5.x:
&
From: Giles Coochey
To: Jack Fredrikson
Cc: "simon.brere...@buongiorno.com" ; Dovecot
Mailing List
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 10:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Marathon Day 6 of First Install: MySQL Connection Problem
I just discovered this:
[root@myserver postfix]# ls -al /u
From: Jack Fredrikson
To: Jack Fredrikson ; Giles Coochey
Cc: "simon.brere...@buongiorno.com" ; Dovecot
Mailing List
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 11:01 AM
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Marathon Day 6 of First Install: MySQL Connection Problem
I have
Hi;
I continue to be plagued with this error:
Oct 25 10:49:18 myserver postfix/pipe[3712]: 0423257901AB: to=,
relay=dovecot, delay=109318, delays=109318/0.14/0/0.1, dsn=4.3.0,
status=deferred (temporary failure
It's been a week that I've been working day and night to get this fixed.
I forgot
Howdy,
Here is a problem with fix affecting dovecot-1.0.10 (and 1.1rc13).
On a linux system's CIFS mounted filesystem, it is not possible to
rename a file opened read-write:
$ sleep 5 >> .subscriptions.lock & mv .subscriptions.lock .subscriptions
mv: cannot move `.subscriptions.lock' to `.sub
address/login name.
I am trying to use auth_bind: when I login with [EMAIL PROTECTED],
dovecot should search for [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the onelevel below
ou=users,dc=lorentz,dc=com and find me as "cn=Jack
McKinney,ou=users,dc=lorentz,dc=com".
I have created an entry in LDA
Red Hat Linux release 7.2 (Enigma)
OpenLDAP 2.3.38
Dovecot 1.0.12
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 23:43 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 09:46 -0500, Jack McKinney wrote:
> > I have _almost_ got Dovecot working! One little snag...
>
> What version?
>
--
Jack
te "user"...
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 23:59 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 09:46 -0500, Jack McKinney wrote:
>
> > ldap([EMAIL PROTECTED],y.y.y.y): bind search: base=ou=users,
> > dc=lorentz,dc=com
> > filter=(&(objectClass=inetOrgPerson)([EM
the reply for some reason. For example on my system:
>
> auth(default): ldap(foo,127.0.0.1): bind search: base=...
> auth(default): ldap(foo,127.0.0.1): result: uid(user)=foo
>
> If Dovecot receives a reply to the "bind search", it logs the "result"
> line, wh
(user)=foo
>
> If Dovecot receives a reply to the "bind search", it logs the "result"
> line, which your logs show is missing.
>
> On Apr 4, 2008, at 12:06 AM, Jack McKinney wrote:
> > I am not sure that I understand you, here. Are you saying that
Dovecot is not receiving...
On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 09:54 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Apr 4, 2008, at 12:50 AM, Jack McKinney wrote:
> > Hmmm... what versions of OpenLDAP and Dovecot are you using?
>
> A lot of people have them working with different LDAP versions. I've
Me, too. I am sure that it is my configuration, but I cannot see
what...
On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 17:20 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
--
Jack McKinney
GPG 1024D/99C6A174
[EMAIL PROTECTED] YM:lfaatsnat2006 AIM:jackmclorentz
"There is no parameter that makes it impossible for you to pe
ser has an entry in the ou=users subtree
of the domain subtree, and has a mail: field (inetOrgPerson) listing
their email address/login name.
I am trying to use auth_bind: when I login with
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
dovecot should search for [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the onelevel below
ou=users,dc=lorent
h can search all domains for the "mail" field.
Thus, dovecot will bind using the varmail DN and then search onelevel
of "ou=users, dc=lorentz, dc=com" for an inetOrgPerson entry whose mail
field is [EMAIL PROTECTED] As demonstrated by the ldapsearch in my
earlier email, this will
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 14:35 +0200, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, Jack McKinney wrote:
>
> > dn: dovecot needs a dn with which to search the database to find the
> > user's DN based on their
ymous read
I do not have this in my configuration, and dovecot does indeed use the
credential I provide to successfully query LDAP for the user based on
the (mail=%u) criteria. However, it does not see the reply.
The fact that it does perform the query successfully implies to me
d=password? dovecot should
never need to see the contents of this field. Indeed, this is the whole
point of using auth_bind: instead of dovecot retrieving the password
from LDAP and checking it against the user-supplied one, dovecot should
_send_ the password to LDAP in the form of a bind and have LDAP
. Rob, It sounds like you are trying to do EXACTLY what I am
trying to do:
1. My users login with their email address.
2a. My users are all over the tree in the sense that you cannot
determine the DN from the email alone. E.g., I am [EMAIL PROTECTED],
but my DN is "cn=Jack McKinney, ou
e from OpenLDAP.
>
> What do you see in the dovecot logs with auth debug on?
--
Jack McKinney
GPG 1024D/99C6A174
[EMAIL PROTECTED] YM:lfaatsnat2006 AIM:jackmclorentz
Beware geeks bearing diffs
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
> method=PLAIN, rip=y.y.y.y, lip=x.x.x.x, TLS
> >
>
> This isn't a TLS mismatch kidn of thing is it?
--
Jack McKinney
GPG 1024D/99C6A174
[EMAIL PROTECTED] YM:lfaatsnat2006 AIM:jackmclorentz
Beware geeks bearing diffs
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
]: conn=7 op=3 SEARCH RESULT tag=101
> err=0 nentries=1 text=
>
> Which shows the correct filter, but the requested attribute to return is
> "uid", which is _not_ in your entry:
>
> # Jack McKinney, users, lorentz.com
> dn: cn=Jack McKinney,ou=users,dc=lorentz,dc=c
y ldap, ex: dc=dominio1,dc=it is the first
> database and dc=dominio2,dc=it is the second one.
> Can I put these two search bases in dovecot-ldap.conf?
>
--
Jack McKinney
GPG 1024D/99C6A174
[EMAIL PROTECTED] YM:lfaatsnat2006 AIM:jackmclorentz
Beware geeks bearing diffs
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
TLS/SSL for the LDAP connection.
>
> BTW: Do you use any sort of firewall, iptables or whatsoever on the mail,
> dns or ldap server? Did you disabled it?
LDAP and IMAP are on the same server. Since the query and the result
both show up in the LDAP logs, it couldn't be a fir
Zhang Huangbin wrote:
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Zhang Huangbin wrote:
Hi, all.
I just upgrade from 1.0.15 to 1.1.1 in a test box(RHEL 5.2, x86_64).
after upgrade, i got this warning msg:
8<
# /etc/init.d/dovecot restart
Stopping Dovecot Imap: [ O
ng forward basis.
Thanks in advance for any answers or hints.
---Jack
--
Jack Stewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.imss.caltech.edu
Solution tested, problem solved - thanks!
This will greatly ease our transition to a more sensible namespace layout.
---Jack
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 09:59 -0700, Jack Stewart wrote:
The interesting part is that after upgrading to 1.1.1, the INBOX would
disappear from
e border. This is where we block ip addresses, if we need to.
Hope this helps.
---Jack
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
I'm in the process of rolling out new setups with dovecot on CentOS 5.2
and I notice that dovecot doesn't handle the brute-force attacks too nice.
I reduced the
ions. For people connecting to Email while in a
Rain Forest, POP seems to be the best option.
It also seems to me that fts plugin (free text indexing) improves
performance. This might just be wishful thinking on my part.
Hope this helps a little.
---Jack
run it, existing messages for mutt
are marked as O (or old). Thunderbird works just fine. I'm betting to
believe these clients hate me. Please let me know of a way to get around
this. Thanks.
---Jack
once - no build on the fly. It does a readdir() to get the full
filenames and make sure that list entries are only for existing files.
As a result, there is almost complete freedom in the output format for
the dovecot-uidlist.
Many thanks in advance!
---Jack
P.S. For better or worse, it does
. The changes need not be perfect nor anytime more
than a suggestion or preference. I just want to make things better for a
little while.
Many thanks in advance.
---Jack
P.S. The performance improvement is amazing - anywhere from 2X to 12X
depending on what metrics you are looking at. It isn't
. The changes need not be perfect nor anytime more
than a suggestion or preference. I just want to make things better for a
little while.
Many thanks in advance.
---Jack
P.S. The performance improvement is amazing - anywhere from 2X to 12X
depending on what metrics you are looking at. It isn't
imo likes the (default) top level structure but that is
very scary in my environment.
I wish I had a better answer but at the end of the day your
configuration depends on your client base and what works best for your
server.
Hope this helps - sorry about the length.
---Jack
--
Jack Stewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.imss.caltech.edu
remap,
you need to go to "Account Settings\Copies & Folders" and change the
"Trash\Sent\Drafts" folder location by using the "Other" checkbox.
Otherwise what happens is that Thunderbird is looking for the old Trash
folder (i.e. Foo.Trash) which no longer exi
.. Original Message ...
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:47:50 +0300 "Timo Sirainen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 10:50 -0700, Jack Stewart wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've just completed a migration from Courier to a Dovecot 1.0.7 (patched
eness. There wasn't a
problem in 1.0.7 but I could have been caught in mid-upgrade.
Thunderbird did not seem to update the subscription file (or at least I
could not find the one it thought it was using).
Any pointers are appreciated. Thanks in advance.
---Jack
/opt/dovecot/sbin/dovec
uture with confused clients/users.
---Jack
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 11:49 -0700, Jack Stewart wrote:
I've upgraded from 1.0.7 to 1.1.3. When I did this, my Thunderbird lost
its brain and did not show some subscribed folders. squirrelmail also
seemed to have issues. App
ts NFS settings. Yet this is a place with some pretty nutty
users. (i.e. 2+GB inboxes, 100K messages, one/minute connections, ...)
---Jack
P.S. As a total aside people migrating from 1.0.X to 1.1.3 may wish to
have to use a different INDEX directory in 1.1.3 than the one you used
in 1.0.7.
running with local index.cache files for each servers
(using sticky connections) and that seems to work fine.
---Jack
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 10:58 -0700, Jack Stewart wrote:
The question is has anyone, with Maildir and the INDEX= on NFS (i.e.
dovecot.index and dovecot.index.cache
st rolling
one server and just rolling webmail for now - we'll see where it goes.
---Jack
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 12:20 -0700, Jack Stewart wrote:
The performance hit was bad. When I tried "mail_nfs_index = yes" the
load went from 0.5 to 120+ (on each of three
or. These settings also got rid of my
error messages under low load.
It is also probably worth while to shut the system down and run memory
test (i.e. memtest86+ - or if it is under maintenance just get it replaced)
---Jack
Allan Cassaro wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Charles M
iguration of the multiple
simultaneous persistent clients that user is using, etc.
lslk, alert logs, strace, testing the most recent 1.1.X version, and
file mtime is giving us some information but we want to make everything
is covered.
Many thanks in advance.
---Jack
--
Jack Stewart
California Inst
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Dec 22, 2008, at 9:01 PM, Jack Stewart wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to associate a user's the login (imap-login) process
with the user's 'imap [' process? We are trying to lock down an issue
to make sure we full understand it. /proc and shared m
Jack Stewart wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Dec 22, 2008, at 9:01 PM, Jack Stewart wrote:
Hi,
What kind of a locking issue? Hangs?
The clients are hanging. There are at least a couple of different types
of locking issues. In both cases the dovecot.cache.index file does not
/configuration does
not sound simple from the dba's I've talked to, although RACK looks decent.
MySQL does work well for index problems (i.e. searches) where the index
can be reconstructed if their is a failure and the searching process
doesn't seize in a failure.
Just my opinion and warning.
---Jack
he default). Do you find
180-300 seconds more reasonable?
---Jack
To give some context, we have a handful of users with intermittent
caching locking where the dovecot.index.cache file would simply not
update. One of our internal people managed to get this problem when he
was using pine
..
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 10:11:08 +0200 "Timo Sirainen" wrote:
>On Dec 31, 2008, at 4:24 AM, Jack Stewart wrote:
>
>> The attribute cache is the default (60 seconds) which works well
>> enough in a polling setting but may be a problem with IDLE (30
>> second c
lease advice. Thank you -- Jane
What is the mtime of your dovecot.index.cache file? Is it significantly
older than the last new message?
---Jack
n 6 01:21:04 fire-griffen dovecot: IMAP(sukwon): Timeout while
waiting for lock for transaction log file
/var/spool/dovecot/indexes/s/sukwon/.Trash/dovecot.index.log
--
Jack Stewart
Academic Computing Services, IMSS,
California Institute of Technology
jstew...@caltech.edu
626-395-4690 office
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 23:11 -0800, Jack Stewart wrote:
an 6 01:21:02 earth-griffen dovecot: IMAP(zabala): Timeout while
waiting for lock for transaction log file
/var/spool/dovecot/indexes/z/zabala/.INBOX/dovecot.index.log
This is the main problem. So indexes are also
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 08:32 -0800, Jack Stewart wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 23:11 -0800, Jack Stewart wrote:
an 6 01:21:02 earth-griffen dovecot: IMAP(zabala): Timeout while
waiting for lock for transaction log file
/var/spool/dovecot/indexes/z
Jack Stewart wrote:
Yes, the indexes are also on NFS.
The locking is fcntl() - the default.
I'm guessing that's the problem. NFS locking seems to break/hang
randomly sometimes. Can you somehow restart the NFS server locking
daemon?
I changed the /etc/hosts.allow s
Hope this helps.
---Jack
are upgrading precisely because of race conditions. My latest joy,
two stratum one clocks that are 1s apart.
Our server environment is pretty specific but there is a lot of
diversity in our user base. The outliers are good test cases.
---Jack
well.
---Jack
f settings needed to Oracle/MySQL/Apache/etc servers.
Tuning isn't limited to just ulimit. I know of some useful RHE settings,
but not all.
---Jack
orage?
I realize that kqueue is probably a bit slower and causes some delay
with IDLE. Also, it may not really make any difference which is why I
ask the question.
---Jack
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 13:08 -0800, Jack Stewart wrote:
Anyone have pro/con experience with dovecot on the inotify/kqueue
question when using NFS storage?
Inotify is for Linux, kqueue is for BSDs. Right? So I'd think there are
a lot of other issues if you're
01-90007/ch05s03.html for further
information.
Jack
le it
lasted. The key to resolving the issue had to do with upgrades to the
dovecot version - we currently just made the jump to 1.1.11 and it seems
to be working well.
---Jack
dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote:
Quoting Jack Stewart :
dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 17:27 -0500, dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us
wrote:
Have there been any issues with dovecot and using outlook express
(imap) as an email client? I have had
r host, boolean for proxy/proxy_maybe
etc). Any interest in registering an LDAP object class for dovecot?
---Jack
with a NULL.
A standard LDAP objectclass does not exist - since there are so make
possible configurations, it is unlikely that you could make everyone happy.
---Jack
Jack Stewart wrote:
Hi,
We're moving to a dovecot proxy / server configuration in order to make
sure that a users go
proxy_timeout=120
}
}
Jack
On 9/27/2012 3:30 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
Version: 2.1.9
Connecting directly to the proxy server on the LMTP port, issue lhlo,
mail from, rcpt to, data. After the . closing of data, it just hangs
there. The logs on the proxy server show:
Looking at dovecot's proxy code.
Cal
On 9/28/2012 11:37 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
On 9/27/2012 3:30 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
Version: 2.1.9
Connecting directly to the proxy server on the LMTP port, issue lhlo,
mail from, rcpt to, data. After the . closing of data, it just hangs
there. The logs on the proxy server show:
I am not sure
On 9/28/2012 12:44 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
On 9/28/2012 11:37 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
On 9/27/2012 3:30 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
Version: 2.1.9
Connecting directly to the proxy server on the LMTP port, issue
lhlo, mail from, rcpt to, data. After the . closing of data, it just
hangs there. The logs
On 9/28/2012 3:12 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
Code needs to be written to handle the special case of us not having
any proxy callbacks as they are all bad.
Timo, please check and approve. This was diff'd on 2.1.10 on my test
server (2.1.9 and 2.1.10 at least had this callback
coming from.
You could bind 2 internal IP Addresses to the server and have each NAT
translation go to a different internal IP.
Jack
On 10/1/2012 2:58 AM, David Ledger wrote:
At 09:33 -0500 30/9/12, Jack Bates wrote:
On 9/30/2012 8:02 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
Hi Timo/everyone,
Currently we are logging the remote IP, but is there a way to show
the IP address that the NAT connection is coming from?
The reason I ask is
lowed by dovecot to 4096 and increases
the number of processes per user to 5120. This is a proxy server, so I
needed to support much larger numbers. than a silly 1024.
Jack
?)
2.1.9/2.1.10 which I packaged shows similar.
Since I connected localhost, the IP is IPv6, of course.
Jack
It looks like this might be a bug in glibc 2.3.3
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1392
Jack
On 10/1/2012 2:20 PM, Fabio Depin wrote:
Hello,
Today I needed to compile dovecot 2.1.10 on Debian 4.0, using gcc 4.1.2.
When running 'make' getting the follo
-nfs-files-from-being-created
Jack
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
