after replication with compression quotas are wrong

eve { mail_max_userip_connections = 10 } protocol lda { mail_plugins = quota zlib notify replication sieve zlib } -- Arnaud Abélard Responsable pôle Système et Stockage Service Infrastructures DSIN Université de Nantes -

Re: after replication with compression quotas are wrong

27;t using the @univ-nantes.fr part. ~# doveadm user 'dummy-c-1*' dummy-c-1 Any ideas? Thanks, Arnaud On 05/11/2021 16:21, Arnaud Abélard wrote: Hello, We are very long time happy dovecot users (since 2008 at least). We have around 90k mailboxes and since we had to move

Re: after replication with compression quotas are wrong

hat I could reset or something? Thanks, Arnaud On 08/11/2021 09:48, Aki Tuomi wrote: This sounds like you are not normalizing usernames properly. Either use auth_username_format = %Ln as global setting, or return `user` attribute in both userdb and passdb lookups. Aki On 07/11/20

Re: after replication with compression quotas are wrong

On 08/11/2021 11:32 Arnaud Abélard wrote: Hello Aki, Thanks for the tip. I changed postfix configuration so it will not use the domain part anymore and added "auth_username_format = %Ln" just in case (and reloaded dovecot). So I shouldn't have any more new user@domain users

Re: after replication with compression quotas are wrong

at it has only dummy-c-1 in replication and that the file count on the target server matches source server? You might also get something useful out of `doveadm -D quota recalc|get -u user` Aki On 08/11/2021 12:22 Arnaud Abélard wrote: On 08/11/2021 10:39, Aki Tuomi wrote: Try doveadm replic

Re: after replication with compression quotas are wrong

have both server running the same version, without improvement. I'm puzzled. Is dovecot storing anything outside of the user's mailbox? Like a cache, a sqlite database of some kind somewhere? Arnaud On 08/11/2021 11:48, Arnaud Abélard wrote: On the target, I enabled the replica

Re: after replication with compression quotas are wrong

On 10/11/2021 15:52, Arnaud Abélard wrote: I've just removed dummy-c-1's mailbox completely on the target server, removed the quota plugin, forced a sync for dummy-c-1 only and once it was done reactivated the quota plugins: double usage again. I also downgraded from dovecot

Re: [SOLVED] after replication with compression quotas are wrong

Arnaud On 12/11/2021 20:09, Arnaud Abélard wrote: On 10/11/2021 15:52, Arnaud Abélard wrote: I've just removed dummy-c-1's mailbox completely on the target server, removed the quota plugin, forced a sync for dummy-c-1 only and once it was done reactivated the quota plugins: doub

replication fails with "Error: sync: Unknown user in remote" but user shows up in doveadm user "*"

server (source and destnation) and the "unknown user" is actually showing up in doveadm user "*" on the destination server. I had already replicated 2 servers and used the same settings. Am I missing something obvious here? Thanks, Arnaud -- Arnaud Abélard Responsab

Re: replication fails with "Error: sync: Unknown user in remote" but user shows up in doveadm user "*"

Hello Christian, I actually found why I had the problem. While I thought the ldap filters were the same, there was a sligth difference (damn crazy long filters!) Sorry about the noise. Arnaud On 22/04/2022 10:08, Christian Mack wrote: Hello Am 21.04.22 um 18:00 schrieb Arnaud Abélard

no full syncs after upgrading to dovecot 2.3.18

There are no errors in the logs. Thanks, Arnaud -- Arnaud Abélard Responsable pôle Système et Stockage Service Infrastructures DSIN Université de Nantes - smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: no full syncs after upgrading to dovecot 2.3.18

wrote: Hello, I am working on replicating a server (and adding compression on the other side) and since I had "Error: dsync I/O has stalled, no activity for 600 seconds (version not received)" errors I upgraded both source and destination server with the latest 2.3 version (2.3.18). While before the upgrade all the 15 replication connections were busy after upgrading dovecot replicator dsync-status shows that most of the time nothing is being replicated at all. I can see some brief replications that last, but 99,9% of the time nothing is happening at all. I have a replication_full_sync_interval of 12 hours but I have thousands of users with their last full sync over 90 hours ago. "doveadm replicator status" also shows that i have over 35,000 queued full resync requests, but no sync, high or low queued requests so why aren't the full requests occuring? There are no errors in the logs. Thanks, Arnaud -- Arnaud Abélard Responsable pôle Système et Stockage Service Infrastructures DSIN Université de Nantes - smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: no full syncs after upgrading to dovecot 2.3.18

x none 00:02:54 07:11:28 -y What could explain that error? Arnaud On 25/04/2022 15:13, Arnaud Abélard wrote: Hello, On my side we are running Linux (Debian Buster). I'm not sure my problem is actually the same as Paul or you Sebastian since I have a lot of

how is the "Total number of known users" reported by doveadm replicator calculted?

users" a lot higher than the number of users reports by doveadm user '*' why is that? Arnaud -- Arnaud Abélard Responsable Service Infrastructures DSIN Université de Nantes - smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

[Dovecot] keywords/flags questions

efinitely? Thanks in advance, Arnaud -- Arnaud Abélard jabber: arnaud.abel...@univ-nantes.fr / twitter: ArnY Administrateur Système DSI Université de Nantes -

[Dovecot] RECENT status always 0

. STATUS INBOX (MESSAGES UNSEEN RECENT) * STATUS "INBOX" (MESSAGES 35106 RECENT 0 UNSEEN 11) How can the UNSEEN count change without the RECENT count changing accordingly? Thanks in advance, Arnaud -- Arnaud Abélard (jabber: arnaud.abel...@univ-nantes.fr) Administrateur Système -

Re: [Dovecot] Feature request

he admins wish: Send an email to a backup account, modify a database, set off an alarm, phone the president, slap the user in the face or whatever. As far as I know that feature could already exist since the idea just popped to me and didn't bother checking the documentation yet. So if

Re: [Dovecot] what best for anti-spam filter?

hough we had to publish a permissive record since some of our users are using their ISP smtp instead of our own). Arnaud -- Arnaud Abélard (jabber: arnaud.abel...@univ-nantes.fr) Administrateur Système - Responsable Services Web Direction des Systèmes d'Informations Université de Nant

Re: [Dovecot] what best for anti-spam filter?

On 07/24/2012 10:49 AM, Morten Stevens wrote: On 24.07.2012 09:16, Arnaud Abélard wrote: And first of all, even if this is not dovecot related, use a greylisting solution. No, greylisting is really a bad solution. It is not RFC compliant and delays the mail traffic. I would prefer a pre

Re: [Dovecot] what best for anti-spam filter?

On 07/24/2012 10:38 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: On 7/24/2012 2:16 AM, Arnaud Abélard wrote: And first of all, even if this is not dovecot related, use a greylisting solution. Greylisting only stops bots. It is resource intensive, and causes delivery delays. There exist bot spam killing

Re: [Dovecot] what best for anti-spam filter?

On 07/24/2012 02:06 PM, Markus Schönhaber wrote: 24.07.2012 11:57, Arnaud Abélard: - With greylisting we aren't rejecting potentially spammy mails, we are rejecting misbehaving servers. That's important, legally speaking. We could be in trouble if we rejected an important mail by mi

[Dovecot] sieve_max_redirects=0 not working as documented

...@univ-nantes.fr>: forwarded to what could I have missed? Thanks, Arnaud -- Arnaud Abélard (jabber: arnaud.abel...@univ-nantes.fr) Administrateur Système - Responsable Services Web Direction des Systèmes d'Informations Université de Nantes - ne pas utiliser: trapem...@univ-nantes.fr

[Dovecot] Out of memory after upgrading to dovecot 2.0.21

emory imap(abelard-a): Fatal: pool_system_realloc(131072): Out of memory /vmail/a/b/abelard-a/dovecot.index.cache is 224MB big and my mailbox is 72% full of 8GB. any idea of what is happening? Thanks in advance, Arnaud -- Arnaud Abélard jabber: arnaud.abel...@univ-nantes.fr / twitter:

Re: [Dovecot] Out of memory after upgrading to dovecot 2.0.21

just another symptom of the same problem? How come we never had that problem with the older version of dovecot 2.0 (sorry, i can't remember which one we were running...). Arnaud On 02/05/2013 06:33 PM, Arnaud Abélard wrote: Hello, I've upgraded our servers and now dovecot s

Re: [Dovecot] Out of memory after upgrading to dovecot 2.0.21

still surprised my mailbox actually hit the memory limit since I doubt it's most used one. Arnaud Am 05.02.2013 18:38, schrieb Arnaud Abélard: Hrm... exactly when I pressed sent, dovecot started giving me more information: master: Error: service(imap): child 22324 returned error 83 (Out

Re: [Dovecot] Out of memory after upgrading to dovecot 2.0.21

On 02/05/2013 09:25 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: On 2/5/2013 12:15 PM, Arnaud Abélard wrote: I changed the vsz_limit to 512MB and it seems better, but I'm still surprised my mailbox actually hit the memory limit since I doubt it's most used one. According to the wiki, vsz_limit on

[Dovecot] autocreate mailbox but no sub folders

easy for a malicious user to flood a mailbox with tons of subfolders. Is there a way to tell dovecot-lda it can only create the initial mailbox and maybe some special folders but nothing else? Thanks, Arnaud -- Arnaud Abélard jabber: arnaud.abel...@univ-nantes.fr / twitter: ArnY Administr

Re: [Dovecot] Mail deduplication

nything to fix on your side? Since we are very interrested in this feature I am very eager to hear about admins using it on a similar scale (around 80,000 mailboxes). Thanks, Arnaud -- Arnaud Abélard (jabber: arnaud.abel...@univ-nantes.fr) Administrateur Système - Responsable Services Web

Re: [Dovecot] Lot of connections IMAP

tionnel to have have 20 processes for one user. We have users who check their mail on their smartphones and on their desktop, some of those have around 80 imap process just for them... Arnaud -- Arnaud Abélard (jabber: arnaud.abel...@univ-nantes.fr) Administrateur Système - Responsable Service