Am Donnerstag, den 24.06.2010, 22:30 -0500 schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
> Does running imapproxy in this scenario yield any benefit, given there
> is no network traffic involved?
it does. IMAPPRoxy caches for example all directories. If the user open
a folder, then you have a new connection to the IMAP
Patrick Nagel put forth on 6/25/2010 1:02 AM:
> Hi,
>
> On 2010-06-25 03:51 UTC Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> Angelo Chen put forth on 6/24/2010 10:25 PM:
>>> I think that's one option, but it's around 10G data for the last few
>>> years, and more than 100 folders under outlook express, do you think
>>>
Angelo Chen put forth on 6/25/2010 1:32 AM:
> Hi,
>
> Nice approach, but the it's Thunderbird, what I have is outlook Express.
The process is the same. Outlook Express can do this also. Have you ever
used OE with an IMAP connection? Do you need instructions on setting up an
IMAP connection?
h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Denny Schierz wrote:
it does. IMAPPRoxy caches for example all directories. If the user open
a folder, then you have a new connection to the IMAP server, that can
take a while (auth ...). After a few seconds the connection is cl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Angelo Chen put forth on 6/25/2010 1:32 AM:
Hi,
Nice approach, but the it's Thunderbird, what I have is outlook Express.
The process is the same. Outlook Express can do this also. Have you ever
used OE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Patrick Nagel wrote:
I tried something similar (with Thunderbird) once, and it caused a lot of
trouble. We only had around 1.3 GB, IIRC, but thousands of folders. Here is a
I cannot back it, I used TB v1.5 on Linux, where you
Hi all, my first post.
After years with an old server, a couple of months ago I've installed a
new one.
We use IMAP. After research, I chosed dovecot.
It has been running for several weeks but from one week ago or so, it
suddently dies about once per day.
The only change done in the server
I had the same problem due to clock backward
On 06/25/2010 09:53 AM, Xavi Montero wrote:
Hi all, my first post.
After years with an old server, a couple of months ago I've installed a
new one.
We use IMAP. After research, I chosed dovecot.
It has been running for several weeks but from one w
Xavi Montero wrote:
It has been running for several weeks but from one week ago or so, it
suddently dies about once per day.
The only change done in the server one week ago has been to install
ntpdate, running once per day in cron-daily.
In the cron reports, ntpdate reports a time-jump of 9
On 25.6.2010 10:53, Xavi Montero wrote:
The only change done in the server one week ago has been to install
ntpdate, running once per day in cron-daily.
In the cron reports, ntpdate reports a time-jump of 9 seconds each
Time jumps, especially backwards, are not a good thing on a server. You
s
Am 25.06.2010 10:35, schrieb William Blunn:
Xavi Montero wrote:
It has been running for several weeks but from one week ago or so, it
suddently dies about once per day.
The only change done in the server one week ago has been to install
ntpdate, running once per day in cron-daily.
In the cr
- Might this time-jump cause dovecot to die?
- I don't know wehere the dovecot logs are written to. Where do I
I've confirmed in the logs that the die was really controlled and caused
by the time-jump:
Here's the log:
"
Jun 25 06:25:00 hidrogeno dovecot: Time just moved backwards by 9
secon
On 25.6.2010, at 8.04, Denny Schierz wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 24.06.2010, 22:30 -0500 schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
>> Does running imapproxy in this scenario yield any benefit, given there
>> is no network traffic involved?
>
> it does. IMAPPRoxy caches for example all directories. If the user open
Hello
Some users had occasionally a problem with Thunderbird , some random
emails with attachement(s) cannot be read anymore
the email appears empty and TB seems to enter in an infinite loop
saying it is downloading the message
The only solution I found was :
1 - stop thunderbird on the clien
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Some users had occasionally a problem with Thunderbird , some random emails
with attachement(s) cannot be read anymore
Yep.
the email appears empty
that one, too
and TB seems to enter in an infinite l
On 25/06/2010 13:46, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Most people seem to be saying imapproxy helps a lot, because they
noticed it helped so much with Courier/UW-IMAP..
Agree.
On 2010-06-24 9:18 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> But with auth cache enabled, there is no extra database load. The
> index files are also most likely in OS's cache (assuming local disk),
> so no extra disk I/O to read them either. I'm sure it's a bit more
> extra CPU usage, but I'm not all that certai
On 2010-06-25 3:19 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> It's interesting that you weren't able/willing to track down the
> source of the problem. It's also interesting how you mention "single
> drag and drop". In my experience, you can't drag/drop _folders_ in
> Thunderbird at all. All the migrations I've d
On 2010-06-25 2:02 AM, Patrick Nagel wrote:
> I tried something similar (with Thunderbird) once, and it caused a lot of
> trouble. We only had around 1.3 GB, IIRC, but thousands of folders.
3.1 is *much* better now...
Now to figure out if there is a way to do this for an entire account -
Inbox,
On 2010-06-25 7:48 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
> Some users had occasionally a problem with Thunderbird , some random
> emails with attachement(s) cannot be read anymore
> the email appears empty and TB seems to enter in an infinite loop
> saying it is downloading the message
>
> The only solution I f
Thanks for your *complete* answer Charles .
On 06/25/2010 02:32 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-06-25 7:48 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Some users had occasionally a problem with Thunderbird , some random
emails with attachement(s) cannot be read anymore
the email appears empty and TB seems to ent
On Friday 25 June 2010 wrote Charles Marcus:
> On 2010-06-24 9:18 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > But with auth cache enabled, there is no extra database load. The
> > index files are also most likely in OS's cache (assuming local disk),
> > so no extra disk I/O to read them either. I'm sure it's a bi
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 14:44 +0200, Amon Ott wrote:
> For whatever it is worth, we use imapproxy, because it allows us to use
> one-time passwords for webmail users. One login, not many.
With large enough auth cache, I think that should also work with Dovecot
directly (although if the session tak
It's interesting that you weren't able/willing to track down the
source of the problem. It's also interesting how you mention "single
drag and drop". In my experience, you can't drag/drop _folders_ in
Thunderbird at all. All the migrations I've done this way required
I migrated to my new server
On 2010-06-25 8:44 AM, Amon Ott wrote:
> For whatever it is worth, we use imapproxy, because it allows us to use
> one-time passwords for webmail users. One login, not many.
That's what I meant by cleaner logs... ;)
On 2010-06-25 8:49 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> With large enough auth cache, I th
hi,
possible to setup a imap server without smtp? just want to store some old
emails.
Angelo
On 2010-06-25 9:58 AM, Angelo Chen wrote:
> possible to setup a imap server without smtp? just want to store some old
> emails.
Of course, one has nothing to do with the other.
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 6/25/2010 10:05 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-06-25 9:58 AM, Angelo Chen wrote:
possible to setup a imap server without smtp? just want to store some old
emails.
Of course, one has nothing to do with the other.
A lot of trouble, more than just importing them into your e-m
Hi Stan,
On 2010-06-25 07:19 UTC Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Patrick Nagel put forth on 6/25/2010 1:02 AM:
> > On 2010-06-25 03:51 UTC Stan Hoeppner wrote:
[...]
> >> The first method is a single step process and is reliable.
> >
> > I tried something similar (with Thunderbird) once, and it caused a l
I was going to ask how much space I should allocate for auth_cache_size
- but decided to read the wiki first. Now I'll be more specific -
Wiki says about 50 bytes per passdb, and up to 200 bytes for userdb - so
my arithmetic says each combined entry needs 250 bytes budgeted.
Assuming that'
On 2010-06-25 10:27 AM, Patrick Nagel wrote:
> I don't know when you tried it, but with the version I used at the time
> (2.0.0.17? .18?), it was possible to copy one folder at a time from one
> account to another, by drag & drop. 99% of the folders were inside one top
> level folder, which I at
Quoting "Daniel L. Miller" :
On 6/24/2010 4:23 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I'd recommend also installing and configuring imapproxy - it can
be beneficial with squirrelmail.
Do you have any about a real world numbers about installation with
and without imapproxy?
What, you want me to actuall
Quoting Timo Sirainen :
But with auth cache enabled, there is no extra database load. The
index files are also most likely in OS's cache (assuming local
disk), so no extra disk I/O to read them either. I'm sure it's a bit
more extra CPU usage, but I'm not all that certain that it's really
Quoting Eric Rostetter :
Quoting "Daniel L. Miller" :
I know when I was playing web clients - particularly squirrelmail -
there was a definite perceived improvement - but I never measured it.
Webmail clients are basically stateless. Over time, they have "cached"
some info for performance,
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 08:09 -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> Let's start small. Assume ten users, all connected - and everybody also
> likes looking at everybody else's mailbox. So there are ten clients,
> each with at least ten connections (I say at least because each folder
> viewed within a
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 18:57 +0200, Thomas Hummel wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 04:40:35PM +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> Hello Timo,
>
> > > doveconf: Fatal: Error in configuration file
> > > /usr/local/dovecot-1.2.12/etc/dovecot.conf line 176: Unknown setting:
> > > process_limit
> >
>
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 17:27 -0300, Alex Baule wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
>
> I Need to know when a email is expunge, but i don't need change this action.
> I Need to call another action + the default action.
>
> There is a plugin to do this ?
In v2.0 there is a notify plugin which you can p
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 16:43 -0300, Alex Baule wrote:
> if (imail->data.stream != NULL ||
>(_mail->uid == 0 && zuser->save_handler == NULL)) {
>return zmail->super.get_stream(_mail, hdr_size, body_size,
> stream_r);
>}
>
> I think this is the line t
Hi all,
ok, I am running version v2.0.beta6 and the latest pigeonhole build to
run managesieve and the sieve delivery filters...
I am getting the following response from the managesieve port when
connecting :
Escape character is '^]'.
"IMPLEMENTATION" "Dovecot"
"SIEVE" ""
"SASL" "PLAIN"
"STARTTL
Rajesh M wrote:
Rajesh M wrote:
Rajesh M wrote:
eric
i studied LDA a bit
>
if i use lda that means all my 5000+ users' email index files will be
continuously updated when every email arrives -- means a lot of writes
to
disk ... is that correct ?
Yes, but I think you make it sound worse tha
Tim Traver wrote:
Hi all,
ok, I am running version v2.0.beta6 and the latest pigeonhole build to
run managesieve and the sieve delivery filters...
I am getting the following response from the managesieve port when
connecting :
Am I missing something?
A little.
what might cause it to n
On 6/25/2010 3:26 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
> Basically, one of the top items on our TODO list. Changes to the
> Dovecot service configuration in Dovecot v2.0 broke the ability to
> dynamically obtain the ManageSieve capabilities before the user has
> logged in. We are close to fixing this, but unti
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 13:49 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 14:44 +0200, Amon Ott wrote:
>
> > For whatever it is worth, we use imapproxy, because it allows us to use
> > one-time passwords for webmail users. One login, not many.
>
> With large enough auth cache, I think tha
On 26.6.2010, at 0.57, Noel Butler wrote:
> As I mentioned earlier It doesnt with squirrelmail, I tried it on
> production and the I/O increased a bit, watching logging alone was
> giving me a
> headache (no, not in debug mode either)..
How much is "a bit" that the I/O increased? Less than 10%?
apologies, I sent this direct to Eric not the list ore OP, my bad :)
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 13:46 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote:
>
> > now i would also need to edit the dovecot.conf file
> > could you guide me on what changes do i need to dovecot.conf file ?
>
> Others on this list would be mo
On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 01:02 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 26.6.2010, at 0.57, Noel Butler wrote:
>
> > As I mentioned earlier It doesnt with squirrelmail, I tried it on
> > production and the I/O increased a bit, watching logging alone was
> > giving me a
> > headache (no, not in debug mode e
Timo,
On 6/24/10 4:23 AM, "Timo Sirainen" wrote:
>>
>> I'd recommend also installing and configuring imapproxy - it can be
>> beneficial with squirrelmail.
>
> Do you have any about a real world numbers about installation with and without
> imapproxy?
We run imapproxy behind our Roundcube ins
On 26.6.2010, at 3.08, Brandon Davidson wrote:
> We run a proxy instance on each of the webmail hosts, with the communication
> between the web application add the proxy being done in cleartext, but with
> the proxy -> Dovecot communication secured over SSL. Besides preventing a
> lot of extra SSL
Steffen Kaiser put forth on 6/25/2010 7:01 AM:
> 2) thunderbird opened too many simultaneous connections to the server. I
> do not remember where they would blocked or terminated, but in some
> cases thunderbird did not seem to detect this failure
This is a pet peeve of mine. Recent TB revs defa
Charles Marcus put forth on 6/25/2010 7:25 AM:
> On 2010-06-25 3:19 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> It's interesting that you weren't able/willing to track down the
>> source of the problem. It's also interesting how you mention "single
>> drag and drop". In my experience, you can't drag/drop _folders
Patrick Nagel put forth on 6/25/2010 9:27 AM:
> Hi Stan,
>
> On 2010-06-25 07:19 UTC Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> Patrick Nagel put forth on 6/25/2010 1:02 AM:
>>> On 2010-06-25 03:51 UTC Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> [...]
The first method is a single step process and is reliable.
>>>
>>> I tried someth
hi, i just tried 3.x, it looks like i can't drag and drop sub folders, and one
problem is, imap folders are on top, and local folders(imported from outlook)
are below, and it has more than 300, drag and drop toward imap folders on top
is very difficult.
On Jun 26, 2010, at 11:24 AM, Stan Hoeppn
I use openLDAP as dovecot pass/user db.
here is main part of dovecot-ldap.conf:
pass_attrs = mail=user, uid=userdb_home=/home/xadmin/%d/%$,userPassword=password
pass_filter = (&(objectClass=posixAccount)(uid=%u))
default_pass_scheme = SSHA
user_attrs = mail=user, uid=home=/home/xadmin/%d/%$
user_
53 matches
Mail list logo
