On December 2, 2009 2:31:12 AM -0800 Frank Cusack
wrote:
If you want to use this patch, you might want to consider using a
magic number (e.g. 999) for :days instead of 0, so that users unaware
of the magic number can't easily send unthrottled vacation responses.
Just change the
"Just" is
On November 29, 2009 10:15:55 AM -0800 Frank Cusack
wrote:
Easy enough for me to patch the sieve code which is likely what I'll do.
Here it is. I decided to store the timestamp (dup) info even though
it isn't used when deciding to send a response, because
1) it saves the addresses that vacat
Just wanted to followup to encourage anyone who thought this was a stupid
idea to speak up. I know in the past we (other companies I've been at)
have always had an autoresponder program and the MTA was set to deliver
to that program. I see no reason for that to not just be sieve.
-frank
On Nov
On November 24, 2009 11:44:52 AM +0800 Patrick Nagel
wrote:
set 'days' to 1, there was an outcry by other project managers that the
contacts would probably not read the auto reply on the first time, or
forget about it immediately, and then send more mails during the day. I
had a lengthy discussi
On November 24, 2009 11:44:52 AM +0800 Patrick Nagel
wrote:
Someone will probably ask why an auto reply to the same person more than
once a day might be necessary.
In my case I want an autoresponder for a shared email account. info@
"Your message has been received, thank you blah bah".
Easy
Fire the new manager, eh?
Now you need to keep TWO old addresses working for the same position!
Stop compounding the issue! ;)
Thomas Berezansky
Merrimack Valley Library Consortium
Quoting Charles Marcus :
On 11/24/2009, Patrick Nagel (patrick.na...@star-group.net) wrote:
2. Add the x-ma
On 11/24/2009, Thomas Harold (thomas-li...@nybeta.com) wrote:
> 3. (slightly different) Have the vacation auto-reply set and also use
> the sieve redirect method after the vacation message gets processed?
>
> redirect :copy "newmana...@example.com";
Different how? Thats was my #1 option, combined
On 11/24/2009, Patrick Nagel (patrick.na...@star-group.net) wrote:
>> 2. Add the x-managers account to your replacements email client, so they
>> can check it as well as theirs.
> 2. is what we did.
>> In either case you could also enable the vacation message notification
>> if you like, but once
On 11/24/2009 6:27 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 11/23/2009, Patrick Nagel (patrick.na...@star-group.net) wrote:
Yes, that was my first proposal, but that was also rejected harshly by
the other project managers. They wanted to have some "transit time" in
which the replacement guy would still acce
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Charles,
On 2009-11-24 19:27, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 11/23/2009, Patrick Nagel (patrick.na...@star-group.net) wrote:
>> Yes, that was my first proposal, but that was also rejected harshly by
>> the other project managers. They wanted to have so
On 11/23/2009, Patrick Nagel (patrick.na...@star-group.net) wrote:
> Yes, that was my first proposal, but that was also rejected harshly by
> the other project managers. They wanted to have some "transit time" in
> which the replacement guy would still access the leaving guy's mailbox.
>
> They fe
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Nov 23, 2009, at 10:54 PM, Patrick Nagel wrote:
Shouldn't that be more like:
reject "this guy is gone";
keep;
Yes, that was my first proposal, but that was also rejected harshly by
the other project managers. They wanted to have some "transit time" in
which the replace
On Nov 23, 2009, at 11:10 PM, Patrick Nagel wrote:
>> Ah, but that's why I had the "keep" there! The reject message of
>> course could have been nicer and said how the guy is gone but this
>> address will be read for a bit longer but anyway stop sending mail
>> here.
>
> Oh... yeah. I never got p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 2009-11-24 11:58, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2009, at 10:54 PM, Patrick Nagel wrote:
>
>>> Shouldn't that be more like:
>>>
>>> reject "this guy is gone"; keep;
>>
>> Yes, that was my first proposal, but that was also rejected harshly
On Nov 23, 2009, at 10:54 PM, Patrick Nagel wrote:
>> Shouldn't that be more like:
>>
>> reject "this guy is gone";
>> keep;
>
> Yes, that was my first proposal, but that was also rejected harshly by
> the other project managers. They wanted to have some "transit time" in
> which the replacement
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Timo,
On 2009-11-24 11:50, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2009, at 10:44 PM, Patrick Nagel wrote:
>
>> Someone will probably ask why an auto reply to the same person more than
>> once a day might be necessary. This is why I needed it:
>> A proj
On Nov 23, 2009, at 10:44 PM, Patrick Nagel wrote:
> Someone will probably ask why an auto reply to the same person more than
> once a day might be necessary. This is why I needed it:
> A project manager was leaving the company, and the contacts writing him
> had to be informed that they should wr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 2009-11-24 00:38, Frank Cusack wrote:
> On November 23, 2009 1:19:00 PM +0100 Rene Bakkum
> wrote:
>>Is there an option to for example
>> auto-reply on every mail that is sendto @domain.com?
>
> The part of this question that was overlooke
Rene Bakkum wrote:
I don't like catch-all addresses either, and I have almost never used
them myself. But our customers seems to like them sometimes, so I can't
ignore their wishes.
You can't do it with Sieve 'vacation'. Listing the exact address is
required.
~Seth
On November 23, 2009 1:19:00 PM +0100 Rene Bakkum
wrote:
Is there an option to for example
auto-reply on every mail that is sendto @domain.com?
The part of this question that was overlooked is "on every mail".
It would be nice if '0' days meant respond to every message.
Alternatively, can
Thanks for all the response.
I understand the desire to have a catch-all address, I used to do it
myself a few years ago. But the aggravation eventually caused me to
reevaluate whether it was worth all of the dictionary attack spam. So
I setup aliases in postfix for all of the addresses tha
On 11/23/2009 7:19 AM, Rene Bakkum wrote:
Hello all,
I am trying to get my vacation messages to work correctly. In general it
works like how I want, and replies when a message is arived to for
example i...@domain.com, but I have some problems to get my vacation
message to work on catch-all boxes
On 11/23/2009, Pascal Volk wrote:
> No, a 'Catch-all-vacation' reply is not possible.
And is a horrible idea anyway...
On 11/23/2009 01:19 PM Rene Bakkum wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am trying to get my vacation messages to work correctly. In general it
> works like how I want, and replies when a message is arived to for
> example i...@domain.com, but I have some problems to get my vacation
> message to work on ca
Hello all,
I am trying to get my vacation messages to work correctly. In general it
works like how I want, and replies when a message is arived to for
example i...@domain.com, but I have some problems to get my vacation
message to work on catch-all boxes. Is there an option to for example
aut
25 matches
Mail list logo
