-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi,
On 2009-11-24 11:58, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Nov 23, 2009, at 10:54 PM, Patrick Nagel wrote: > >>> Shouldn't that be more like: >>> >>> reject "this guy is gone"; keep; >> >> Yes, that was my first proposal, but that was also rejected harshly >> by the other project managers. They wanted to have some "transit >> time" in which the replacement guy would still access the leaving >> guy's mailbox. >> >> They felt that just deactivating the mailbox and rejecting mails >> would be "rude". > > Ah, but that's why I had the "keep" there! The reject message of > course could have been nicer and said how the guy is gone but this > address will be read for a bit longer but anyway stop sending mail > here. Oh... yeah. I never got past the "reject", I guess ;) That would probably be a good solution. Does 'reject' also refrain from sending mails to mailing lists, auto-generated messages, etc., like 'vacation' does? Patrick. - -- STAR Software (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. http://www.star-group.net/ Phone: +86 (21) 3462 7688 x 826 Fax: +86 (21) 3462 7779 PGP key E883A005 https://stshacom1.star-china.net/keys/patrick_nagel.asc Fingerprint: E09A D65E 855F B334 E5C3 5386 EF23 20FC E883 A005 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAksLXMQACgkQ7yMg/OiDoAWaZgCguKuzYmEzUBhxMC1C2XzB/WLy gJEAniwNr1m195qxpsIkxl2jNN5HLMsO =nS3d -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
