Re: Dovecot and Thunderbird 15

Thunderbird 15? Either you you meant the brand new 115, you're using an extremely old and long past supported version of Thunderbird... On 8/9/2023 10:52 AM, Elise via dovecot wrote > Hi, > I recently had some issues with Thunderbird 15 when removing e-mail. > With my other mailclient Outlook I c

Re: adding caldav/carddav next to dovecot

A HUGE second for SOGo We used it for many years in a Gentoo/Dovecot/Postfix environment. It was super fast/snappy, and extremely reliable, and works perfectly with both Thunderbird AND Outlook (this was a huge plus for some of our users who ridiculously preferred Outlook)... they also offer imp

Re: Move sent emails to sent folder?

On 6/16/2022 7:33 PM, Austin Witmer wrote > Hello all! > > I have a server running dovecot & postfix. I have a user on my server who is > sending email via smtp on an HP printer and because of that, a copy of the > email is not placed in the sent folder like usually happens with clients like > o

Re: Outlook vs Thunderbird

On Tue Jul 07 2020 02:07:08 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Mark Constable wrote: > FWIW I meant if the client is Windows7/old-Outlook then changing either > 993/SSL or 143/STARTTLS to 143/NONE could help pick up the mail. We had > to do this for a 100 or so clients a few months ago after upgrad

Re: JMAP support

Fyi, JMAP support is now officially on Thunderbirds roadmap for 2021... Ok, I'll say it... Pretty please?! On 7/9/2019, 1:36:58 AM, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote: > No ETA yet. > > Aki > > On 7.7.2019 1.12, Martynas Bendorius via dovecot wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Is there any ETA set for JMAP supp

Updated Roadmap for Dovecot?

Hello, Just wanted to go take a peek at the latest Roadmap for dovecot, and note that the current wiki page is flagged as obsolete: https://wiki.dovecot.org/Roadmap Is there an updated version somewhere? I'm interested in the list of new features being worked on - especially JMAP support - and

Re: Dovecot behind Load Balancer

On 7/10/2019, 4:27:32 AM, Sami Ketola via dovecot wrote: > There is a limit on thunderbird config that controls this. And the default is 5 if memory serves...

Re: Stats/Metrics in 2.3

On 6/2/2019, 1:46:37 PM, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote: > Yep, I just wasn’t sure how large that file might be (One mailing > list didn’t like the inline 14,000 line log file for some > inexplicable reason). Well, there is a pretty big difference between a huge log file and a small config file. Every

Re: Convert Maildir to Dbox?

On Wed May 29 2019 02:00:24 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote: > On 29.5.2019 8.17, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote: >> Are you sure you read >> it? https://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/dbox seems pretty clear. > David, in particular, is there some question you feel that

Re: JMAP support in Dovecot

Bron Gondwana via dovecot wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2019, at 23:43, Tanstaafl via dovecot wrote: >> On Wed May 22 2019 05:44:59 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Aki Tuomi >> via dovecot wrote: >> > Unfortunately we have not been able to work on this much, but also the &

Re: How to get original recipient from Postfix when using LMTP?

On Wed May 22 2019 13:34:42 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), MRob via dovecot wrote: > On 2019-05-22 08:18, Tuomo Soini via dovecot wrote: >> On Tue, 21 May 2019 18:24:46 + >> MRob via dovecot wrote: >> >>> Many people prefer to use LMTP for delivery from postfix for better >>> efficiency bu

Re: JMAP support in Dovecot

On Wed May 22 2019 05:44:59 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote: > Unfortunately we have not been able to work on this much, but also the > JMAP spec was until very recently still being worked. We have open > dialogue with the Thunderbird people, they haven't so far indic

Re: JMAP support in Dovecot

Hello Aki, Well, it has been over 3 years since I last asked... You had said initial JMAP support would hopefully make it into 2.3. Since it didn't, I'm hoiping it isn't too far away. There is some movement with the new Thunderbird team on this, but they can't really start serious work on adding

Re: Permissions fix

On Wed May 15 2019 12:58:39 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Lefteris Tsintjelis via dovecot wrote: > Is there a fast way for dovecot to set and/or fix its directory permissions? I don't think so. I suggested dovecot implement something like postfix does, but I believe the response was that ther

Re: Sis to deduplicate attachments does not work?

On Wed Apr 24 2019 04:12:30 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Daniel Miller via dovecot wrote: > If you've got good hardware, including a proper UPS, I'd recommend dbox > (my server is presently using sdbox). With large mailboxes and > file-based backups you'll benefit from mdbox. When reliability

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA/LMTP vs postfix virtual delivery agent and the x-original-to header

Sadly, I guess not... I'm not sure what to make of this, seeing as both Wietse and Timo said it was almost a trivial thing to fix. On Fri Apr 12 2019 12:17:22 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Tanstaafl via dovecot wrote: > I'm resurrecting this again because I'm getti

Re: Fwd: SOLR/Index?

On 4/15/2019, 6:59:59 AM, Larry Rosenman via dovecot wrote: > If I login to roundcube with @lerctr.org it > finds the autoindexed mail. > > So, if I make everyone always authenticate as @lerctr.org > we should be fine. You can configure roundcube to always

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA/LMTP vs postfix virtual delivery agent and the x-original-to header

I'm resurrecting this again because I'm getting pretty close to possibly being ready to install a brand new dovecot server (finally), but I still need for dovecots LMTP to add the x-original-to header. So... was this completed quietly, or is support for it still not there? Thanks, Charles On Tu

Re: Restoring mailboxes from backup duplicates messages in POP clients

On Wed Apr 10 2019 11:14:29 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), @lbutlr via dovecot wrote: > On 10 Apr 2019, at 08:59, Tanstaafl via dovecot wrote: >> On Wed Apr 10 2019 09:13:41 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Luis F. V. >> Gomes via dovecot wrote: >>> I had a disk pro

Re: Restoring mailboxes from backup duplicates messages in POP clients

On Wed Apr 10 2019 09:13:41 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Luis F. V. Gomes via dovecot wrote: > I had a disk problem and had to reformat it. All mailboxes were backed > up using rsync. > After I restored the mailboxes, the POP clients (Thunderbird) that > were configured to leave the message

Re: Using lmtp to authenticate email users

On Thu Mar 28 2019 17:04:37 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Patrick Mahan via dovecot wrote: > Hmm, actually it is set - > > root@ns:/usr/local/etc/dovecot # dovecot -a | grep auth_username_format > auth_username_format = %Ln Use doveconf, not dovecot (although they may do the same thing). do

Re: Migration

On 12/31/2018, 5:22:48 AM, Ignacio García wrote: > A totally different approach (that is imap-server agnostic), providing > that you're setting up those new accounts with temporary passwords > (which you know), before users change their passwords to their liking: > you could also use imapsync (

Re: Solr

On 1/3/2019, 3:07:18 PM, Daniel Miller via dovecot wrote: > On 1/3/2019 10:56 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: >> On 12/21/2018, 11:19:42 AM, Daniel Miller via dovecot >> wrote: >>> There is a *huge* difference between a functional Solr setup & squat >> Interesting. Care

Re: Solr

On 12/21/2018, 11:19:42 AM, Daniel Miller via dovecot wrote: > There is a *huge* difference between a functional Solr setup & squat Interesting. Care to elaborate?

Re: Solr

On Wed Dec 05 2018 07:35:39 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Joan Moreau via dovecot wrote: > Why making squat obsolete ? It is simple and straightforward Because no one has stepped up to maintain it?

Re: Cannot make disable_plaintext_auth = no works in configuration

gnature> > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 6:51 AM, Tanstaafl > wrote: > On 11/11/2018, 4:02:25 AM, Steve Leung <mailto:steveleung...@yahoo.com>> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > No matter how I try, I cannot make the config disab

Re: Cannot make disable_plaintext_auth = no works in configuration

On 11/11/2018, 4:02:25 AM, Steve Leung wrote: > Hi, > > No matter how I try, I cannot make the config disable_plaintext_auth = > no to work. I have set it up in 10-auth.conf but when I check with > doveconf -a it is still disable_plaintext_auth = yes. As expected. doveconf -a shows all DEFAULT

Re: Best way to move mail from one server to another

Never mind, should have waited and read the entire thread... On Wed Sep 26 2018 09:52:26 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Tanstaafl wrote: > Finally have some time to review list emails... > > On Tue Sep 04 2018 03:41:50 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Sami > Ketola wrote:

Re: Best way to move mail from one server to another

Finally have some time to review list emails... On Tue Sep 04 2018 03:41:50 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Sami Ketola wrote: > imapsync always loses data. Hi Sami, Can you expand on this? I used ImapSync to migrate from Dovecot to Office365 a couple of years ago, and didn't notice any issu

Re: Set X-Original-To based an ORCPT?

I really wish this was foxed. this is the only thing preventing me from using LMTP... On Tue Aug 07 2018 09:29:18 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Tom Sommer wrote: > On 2018-08-07 13:07, Marco Giunta wrote: >> Hi, >> to get a 'Delivered-to' header based on ORCPT, I wrote a patch >> (attached)

Re: new problem

On Wed Jun 13 2018 18:49:18 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Walter Ulmke wrote: > 1) my inbox is "Posteingang". should I officially declare it somewhere? > WHERE IS THE SERVER LOG? Ummm... have you ever managed a mail server before? If so, I think you need to start with the very basics, and

Permissions issues - was Re: Cannot delete folder

On Mon May 21 2018 14:20:51 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Linda A. Walsh wrote: > Yves Goergen wrote: >> The issue still exists. Can anybody explain to me why dovecot creates >> IMAP folders with the wrong filesystem permissions? > On a lark, I looked through my dirs @ permissions. Shorted l

Re: expiring mail from root's Maildirs?

On Fri May 04 2018 10:59:22 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), LuKreme wrote: > The mail is crontab mail that is sent out to users via mutt. What would be > the "right” way to do this? (The cron tasks run as root because they are > scanning system logs on behalf of certain users and those scans c

Re: SIS and Filesystem level backups (was just Re: Filesystem level backups?)

Bummer, apparently things haven't changed (for the better) with respct to backup sand SIS... :( On 4/9/2018, 12:28:31 PM, Tanstaafl wrote: > On 4/9/2018, 11:34:40 AM, Ivan Warren wrote: >> Le 4/9/2018 à 4:56 PM, DurgaPrasad - DatasoftComnet a écrit : >>> Does do

SIS and Filesystem level backups (was just Re: Filesystem level backups?)

On 4/9/2018, 11:34:40 AM, Ivan Warren wrote: > Le 4/9/2018 à 4:56 PM, DurgaPrasad - DatasoftComnet a écrit : >> Does doveadm backup backup the attachments as well when using SIS? > As far as I know, it does (it de-shares shared attachments) > > I've used that solution to stop using SIS at one p

Re: Disable SIS

On Wed Mar 14 2018 15:17:58 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Nick Rosier wrote: > I'm currently running a small home-server with Dovecot. A long time ago > I configured it with SIS enabled. I would like to stop using SIS. > > If I remove sis from mail_attachment_fs will the old mails that are

Re: Assertion during dsync receive

On Tue Mar 13 2018 08:12:29 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Aki Tuomi wrote: > On 13.03.2018 14:10, Tanstaafl wrote: >> Yes... per folder? Or per user? > Sorry, ment per folder. =) Heh, no worries, ok, thanks, nothing to worry about so much then.

Re: Assertion during dsync receive

On Tue Mar 13 2018 07:42:31 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Aki Tuomi wrote: >> Is this index file kept on a per *folder* basis? Or per user/account? > Yes Yes... per folder? Or per user? >> If it is per folder, then it is much less of a problem, and could be >> worked around simply by moving

Re: Assertion during dsync receive

On Sat Feb 24 2018 11:32:05 GMT-0500 (Eastern Daylight Time), Aki Tuomi wrote: >> On 23 February 2018 at 23:12 Tanstaafl wrote: >> Ok, so, I'm still unclear... >> >> what cache are we talking about? Are you saying that there is a limit to >> how many e

Re: Really slow IMAP performance

On Sat Feb 24 2018 17:01:01 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), @lbutlr wrote: > On 2018-02-24 (07:14 MST), Aki Tuomi wrote: >> >> https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Migration/MailFormat > > That didn't show up when searching wiki2 for "Migration" :/ Don't search 'wiki2', search just wiki.dovecot.org I n

Re: Assertion during dsync receive

On Fri Feb 23 2018 14:53:53 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Aki Tuomi wrote: > It is problem for any mailbox Ok, so, I'm still unclear... what cache are we talking about? Are you saying that there is a limit to how many emails dovecot can store in a single... 'folder'?

Re: Assertion during dsync receive

On Fri Feb 23 2018 13:53:27 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Aki Tuomi wrote: > Once you cache grows bigger than 0x400 you have problems This is for a single mailbox? IS this only a problem for mbox and maybe sdbox?

Re: Optimizing search performance for mobile devices / web mailer / general - solr plugin config

On Fri Feb 23 2018 03:51:37 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Peter Chiochetti wrote: > There is a trick to have messages indexed on arrival, instead of at > mailbox access, "fts_autoindex = yes" in the plugin section. This is not > mentioned in the dovecot wiki page but might be useful. Not su

Re: Questions about SPECIAL-USE IMAP extension

On Wed Jan 17 2018 15:56:39 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Joseph Tam wrote: > Thanks. How does this manifests itself: the client gets an inconsistent > view of the outgoing mailbox that depends on which mailbox the client > is using, or the optimization is broken and dovecot keeps having to >

Re: Questions about SPECIAL-USE IMAP extension

On Mon Jan 15 2018 18:11:24 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Joseph Tam wrote: > Tanstaafl writes: > >>> Is this what you are looking for? >>> >>> https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/MailboxAlias >>> >>> It seems already be implemented... >&g

Re: Questions about SPECIAL-USE IMAP extension

On Fri Jan 12 2018 17:02:29 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Joseph Tam wrote: > Tanstaafl wrote: > >> There was a similar discussion about this on list some time ago, about >> whether or not Dovecot could utilize special use 'aliases' that your >> clien

Re: Questions about SPECIAL-USE IMAP extension

On Fri Jan 12 2018 15:58:06 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Pedro Ribeiro wrote: > Is this what you are looking for? > > https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/MailboxAlias > > It seems already be implemented... A first step maybe, but no, not quite.

Re: Questions about SPECIAL-USE IMAP extension

On Fri Jan 12 2018 01:29:37 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Steffen Kaiser wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jan 2018, Joseph Tam wrote: >> I'd like to configure my dovecot service to use the IMAP SPECIAL-USE > well, in my experience SPECIAL-USE is just a suggestions to clients. Check > RFC 6154 for MUSTs,

Re: New Dovecot service: SMTP Submission (RFC6409)

On 12/22/2017, 1:19:45 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Tanstaafl, maybe you could explain what you think the BURL/URLAUTH > stuff is for, or do you have some particular use case you would be using > it? Client support already is not required, and yes, it might take a > long time before client

Re: New Dovecot service: SMTP Submission (RFC6409)

On Sat Dec 16 2017 15:41:25 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Tanstaafl wrote: > Ok, well, my ignorance is probably glaring here, but what I meant was, > the make the BURL/URLAUTH pieces strictly between Dovecot and the > backend SMTP server, make it invisible to the Client... So, I ta

Re: New Dovecot service: SMTP Submission (RFC6409)

On 12/16/2017, 5:10:14 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote: > Op 12/14/2017 om 6:07 PM schreef Tanstaafl: >> One other point. >> >> Adding support for something like this that also requires Clients to add >> support for it is just begging for a feature that never gets used. >&g

Re: New Dovecot service: SMTP Submission (RFC6409)

12/14/2017, 10:57:44 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: > On 12/14/2017, 3:03:41 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: >> On 13.12.2017 21:41, Tanstaafl wrote: >>> On 12/12/2017, 1:39:08 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: >>> I thought this was simply going to be an SMTP like service that any SMTP >>&g

Re: New Dovecot service: SMTP Submission (RFC6409)

On 12/14/2017, 3:03:41 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > On 13.12.2017 21:41, Tanstaafl wrote: >> On 12/12/2017, 1:39:08 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: >> I thought this was simply going to be an SMTP like service that any SMTP >> client could utilize, keeping the BURL/URLAUTH pieces wo

Re: New Dovecot service: SMTP Submission (RFC6409)

On 12/12/2017, 1:39:08 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: > However, keep in mind that for this particular feature we're just > providing the "chicken" as it were. The "egg", i.e. client support, is > still to come. Apart from Trojita (which I think is still not widely > used), I know of no IMAP client s

Re: New Dovecot service: SMTP Submission (RFC6409)

This is fantastic Stephan! Especially since I'll soon be rolling a new Dovecot server to act as a backup for our current Office 365 mail, as well as to be prepared in case I can ever talk the boss into migrating back to dovecot (we were using Dovecot for a really long time until he was convinced by

Re: dovecot-lda without starting dovecot?

On 11/6/2017, 6:18:43 PM, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 09:50:16 -0500 Tanstaafl wrote: >> Dovecot's indexing is one of its main features, and WHY it is so much >> faster than others. >> >> And you want to just turn it off? Good luck... &g

Re: dovecot-lda without starting dovecot?

On 11/6/2017, 4:01:19 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > Still we are not content with it touching/locking dovecot.index.log. If > someone pointed at one location in the code where this could be disabled we > would implement a new param for switching that off. ? Dovecot

Re: Dovecot - Postfix Calender Synchronisation

On Wed Aug 23 2017 14:26:15 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Rupert Gallagher wrote: > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 7:22 PM, Tanstaafl wrote: > >> I would have to put in a plug for SOGo - very lightweight, ... > >> Care to elaborate? > > https://github.com/i

Re: Dovecot - Postfix Calender Synchronisation

On Wed Aug 23 2017 08:57:27 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Sebastian Arcus wrote: > On 23/08/17 09:11, m...@caloro.ch wrote: >> On Wed Aug 23 2017 12:07:03 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), >> Rupert Gallagher wrote: >>> Please witch add-on possibilities exist to synchronize the Calednar with

Re: Ubuntu 16.04 dovecot-core requires deprecated ntpdate

On 8/17/2017, 9:57:32 AM, Michael Fox wrote: > When I select the dovecot-core package in Synaptic, it also wants to install > ntpdate. > > Problem: ntpdate has been replaced in Ubuntu with timedatectl. In fact, if > ntpdate exists on the machine, ntpd will not work properly. So, this is obviou

Re: correct permissions /etc/dovecot ?

On Wed Aug 16 2017 02:57:32 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), voy...@sbt.net.au wrote: > what permissions/ownership should /etc/dovecot/files have? It would be nice if Dovecot had something like Postfix's set-permissions command.

Re: under another kind of attack

On Sat Jul 29 2017 13:44:53 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Doug Barton wrote: > On 07/25/2017 07:54 AM, mj wrote: >> Since we implemented country blocking, > > Please don't do that. Balkanizing the Internet doesn't really benefit > anyone, and makes innovation a lot more difficult. Your use

Re: under some kind of attack

Welcome to the world of mail admin... On 7/18/2017, 3:44:20 PM, mj wrote: > Hi all, > > It seems we are under some kind of password guessing attack: > >> Jul 18 21:33:33 auth: Info: ldap(username1,103.6.223.61,): >> invalid credentials (given password: 1q2w3e4r5t) >> Jul 18 21:34:16 auth: Info

Re: migrate Maildir to mdbox

On Tue May 02 2017 10:58:33 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Aki Tuomi wrote: > mbox is not recommended for new setups unless you have very good reason to do > so. > > Use maildir or sdbox. Just curious - why not mdbox?

Re: Replacement for antispam plugin

On Wed Mar 01 2017 03:11:48 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Aki Tuomi wrote: >> But, if the imapsieve is only matching to literal foldernames, should >> I just duplicate the trigger lines for each type of junk folder or is >> there a method to have the sieve script enumerate all the options >> l

Re: Scaling to 10 Million IMAP sessions on a single server

On 2/22/2017, 3:46:08 PM, KT Walrus wrote: > I want to use mdbox format but I have heard that these index files do > get corrupted occasionally and have to be rebuilt (possibly using an > older version of the index file to construct a new one). I worry that > using mdbox might cause my users to se

Re: Director+NFS Experiences

On Fri Feb 24 2017 14:41:17 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Francisco Wagner C. Freire wrote: > In our experience. A ring with more of 4 servers is bad, we have sync > problems everyone. Using 4 or less works perfect. Since this contradicts Timo's recommendation not to use more than 10, it sou

Re: v2.2.28 release candidate released

On Mon Feb 20 2017 05:15:34 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Timo Sirainen wrote: > + auth: Support OAUTHBEARER and XOAUTH2 mechanisms. Also support them >in lib-dsasl for client side. So... does this mean dovecot now has OAUTH2 support? If so... yay! and I'll go open a Thunderbird bug to a

Re: JMAP support in Dovecot

Hi Aki, Someone just asked in the bug for Thunderbird for this, so... Is there a git branch that they could use to start playing with what is there? If not, any idea when that might happen? It sounds like someone following the Thunderbird bug is interested in working on this, but they obviously

Re: mailboxes and capitalisation

On 12/13/2016 4:48 AM, Thorsten Hater wrote: > I have set up a series of special-use mailboxes in the default namespace > differing by capitalisation of the names, mainly to capture multiple > mailboxes > with autoexpunge > > namespace inbox { > ... > mailbox Trash { > auto= no >

Re: Good email client to use with Dovecot?

On 11/22/2016 11:05 AM, Larry Rosenman wrote: > I keep a separate ARCHIVE/-MM/ namespace for old mail and move > the mail on the first of the month. That way most clients don't load it, > but I can get to them. I keep one box per mailing list and other "things". I keep a single 'Old Mail' f

Re: Good email client to use with Dovecot?

On 11/22/2016 10:35 AM, @lbutlr wrote: > On Nov 22, 2016, at 7:48 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: >> I'm trying for the life of me to see a use case for anywhere close to >> 1,000 folders, and am failing. That would be a major problem just from >> the human side. How do you find

Re: Good email client to use with Dovecot?

On 11/18/2016 1:50 PM, Steve Litt wrote: > On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 08:14:02 -0500 > Tanstaafl wrote: >> On 11/17/2016 10:58 AM, Steve Litt wrote: >>> I have over 620K emails in over 1000 folders. This turns Thunderbird >>> into an all day affair, just to refresh its

Re: Good email client to use with Dovecot?

On 11/17/2016 11:03 PM, li...@lazygranch.com wrote: > Comments about the retired TB: > ‎https://blog.mozilla.org/thunderbird/ > > Practically what this means is that in 2016, Thunderbird will finally > be able to accept donations from users directed toward the update and > mai

Re: Good email client to use with Dovecot?

On 11/17/2016 10:58 AM, Steve Litt wrote: > I have over 620K emails in over 1000 folders. This turns Thunderbird > into an all day affair, just to refresh its caches. There are lots of knobs you can tweak to improve the situation, but the bottom line is - 1,000 folders (really?!?), 650,000 emails

Re: New Gmail Android App and Dovecot

On 11/16/2016 2:39 PM, David Flanigan wrote: > Dovecot: v2.2.10 (using self signed certificates) Very old. First thing on your agenda should be top upgrade...

Re: Server migration

On 11/1/2016 3:58 AM, Sami Ketola wrote: > On 31 Oct 2016, at 13.11, Tanstaafl wrote: >> Ok, interesting. So... how does dsync do it? Or would it only work >> between two dovecot servers? >> >> I'm interested in migrating from other servers (Office 365 in one c

Re: Server migration

On 10/30/2016 5:32 AM, Sami Ketola wrote: > On 28 Oct 2016, at 16.54, Tanstaafl wrote: >> Oh... I thought the --useuid option eliminated this problem? >> >> https://imapsync.lamiral.info/FAQ.d/FAQ.Duplicates.txt > It does not. There is no option at IMAP level to set th

Re: Server migration

On 10/27/2016 8:36 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 27 Oct 2016, at 15:29, Tanstaafl wrote: >> On 10/26/2016 2:38 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta >>> my only question is: how to manage the email received on the new server >>> during the last rsync phase? >> >> Us

Re: Server migration

On 10/26/2016 2:38 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: > This is much easier than dovecot replication as i can start immedialy with > no need to upgrade the old server > > my only question is: how to manage the email received on the new server > during the last rsync phase? Use IMAPSync - much bett

Re: Supporting RFC 5466 (IMAP4 Extension for Named Searches (Filters))

On 9/26/2016 11:51 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > >> On September 26, 2016 at 4:14 PM Tanstaafl wrote: >> >> >> On 9/19/2016 11:26 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: >>> On 10/1/2014 3:21 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: >>>> On 10/1/2014 2:42 PM, Jesus Cea wrote: >

Re: Supporting RFC 5466 (IMAP4 Extension for Named Searches (Filters))

On 9/19/2016 11:26 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: > On 10/1/2014 3:21 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: >> On 10/1/2014 2:42 PM, Jesus Cea wrote: >>> I wonder if Dovecot supports RFC 5466 (IMAP4 Extension for Named >>> Searches (Filters)) or if there is any plan about it. > >>

Re: Panic: file auth-request.c

On 9/17/2016 2:15 PM, Chris Wik wrote: > So we upgraded to a new CentOS 7 server with SSD RAID, fast CPUs and > tons of RAM. No more load problems. We compiled the latest dovecot > from source (as the version from CentOS yum repo is already quite > old, figure we might as well run the latest versi

Re: Supporting RFC 5466 (IMAP4 Extension for Named Searches (Filters))

On 10/1/2014 3:21 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: > On 10/1/2014 2:42 PM, Jesus Cea wrote: >> I wonder if Dovecot supports RFC 5466 (IMAP4 Extension for Named >> Searches (Filters)) or if there is any plan about it. > I have a partial implementation in my patch queue. I haven't worked on > it for a few

Re: Bug: Shared Mailbox - Case Sensitivity

On 9/16/2016 6:53 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > On 16.09.2016 12:54, Leander Schäfer wrote: >> user=Leander@MyDomain.LocalDomain eilrwts >> ^^ Doesn't work > Hi! Did you know you can use %Lu instead of %u to force lowercasing? In my opinion this should be the default...

Re: dovecot-keywords and mbox

On 9/15/2016 1:59 PM, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote: > With Maildir++ it is possible to store list of IMAP message keyworkds > (tags in Thunderbird) on server in dovecot-keywords file. > > Is it possible the same with mbox mailboxes? > > My mbox directory contains .subscriptions file, but no .dovecot-

Re: virtual users, mailer daemon send mails to non existant recipient and dovecot store it

On 8/24/2016 8:08 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: > 2. Don't accept mail from domains that you control that don't originate > from your smtp server(s) > > Problem solved. Oops, that should of course read: 2. Don't accept mail that is both TO & FROM a (the same) domai

Re: Sub addressing delimiters

On 8/23/2016 4:42 PM, Kurt Fitzner wrote: > There is a disconnect between the way Postfix handles > recipient_delimiter and the way Dovecot handles it. For Postfix, it is > a set of delimiters that can each individually be used to separate the > address from the . In Dovecot, having multiple

Re: virtual users, mailer daemon send mails to non existant recipient and dovecot store it

On 8/23/2016 11:57 AM, Sam wrote: > The problem is that the sender of the spam as something like > voicem...@ourdomain.fr ( the user voicemail doesn't exist in our database ) > > And sometimes dovecot create the directory and store the reply 's mail... 1. Don't accept mail for non-existent (inv

Re: an e-mail client for dovecot ?

Please do NOT send to me directly, I am on the list. Anyone who wishes direct responses should say so by setting explicit Reply-To. On 7/19/2016 11:42 AM, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > On 18/07/16 11:46, Stephan Bosch wrote: >> >> >> Op 16-7-2016 om 18:12 schreef Charles Marcus: >>> >>> On Jul

Re: Migrate Dovecot email archive

On 6/20/2016 3:13 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sun, 19 Jun 2016, Marco Usai wrote: > >> Yesterday I'vemigrated Dovecot mail archive between two servers using the >> procedure below: >> 1) Createon the new server the same email accounts exist

Re: Mail dates

On 6/17/2016 1:51 PM, @lbutlr wrote: > The issue is that the files currently in the milder have the correct > time stamps, but Dovecot reports them to the IMAP clients as having a > different time and date. Maybe - or maybe not... Different clients perceive the dates differently... Here is a de

Re: Mail dates

On 6/17/2016 1:51 PM, @lbutlr wrote: > On Jun 15, 2016, at 10:46 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: >> On 6/15/2016 12:30 PM, @lbutlr wrote: >>> The original emails were in box files, so that was not the issue. >> >> How were they restored? > The issue is that the files

Re: Mail dates

On 6/15/2016 12:30 PM, @lbutlr wrote: > On Jun 15, 2016, at 9:44 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: >> On 6/14/2016 6:50 PM, @lbutlr wrote: >>> Where exactly does dovecot get the date that it reports via IMAP? >> >> This is a problem with how you restored the files. >>

Re: Mail dates

On 6/14/2016 6:50 PM, @lbutlr wrote: > Where exactly does dovecot get the date that it reports via IMAP? This is a problem with how you restored the files. On a linux system, you should use something like rsync -a to preserve the original date/times...

Re: Multiple recipient delimiter support?

On 6/6/2016 2:24 AM, Tom Sommer wrote: > https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/972c9172e9e6a0fc6053efb3d2ee9d354b67727f So, for non programmers, this is you're way of saying yes, the patch was committed to core code? Thanks

Re: Multiple recipient delimiter support?

On 6/2/2016 3:50 PM, Tanstaafl wrote: > On 6/2/2016 10:35 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: >> Trying to find out if dovecot supports the use of multiple recipient >> delimiters, as postfix does, but can't find an answer... > > The reason this is important is simple. I've en

Re: Multiple recipient delimiter support?

On 6/2/2016 10:35 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: > Trying to find out if dovecot supports the use of multiple recipient > delimiters, as postfix does, but can't find an answer... The reason this is important is simple. I've encountered a lot of sites that refuse to accept an email with t

Multiple recipient delimiter support?

Trying to find out if dovecot supports the use of multiple recipient delimiters, as postfix does, but can't find an answer... The wiki only mentions it in two meaningful places (that I can find)... With respect to postfix: /wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Postfix The above seems to imply that for postfix/L

Re: ot: migrating TB user's email to new laptop

On 5/25/2016 5:15 AM, Paolo wrote: > Start TB on the new laptop > Close it > You have created the default folder/settings in the local %appdata% folder > > copy the %appdata%\Thunderbird folder from the old laptop to the new No need for step 1. Just copy the folder from %appdata% on old PC to t

  1   2   >