I recently changed the userdb to sql, using a stored procedure and since then,
every so often, maybe 2-3 times per day I see errors like these in the maillog:
Apr 17 13:33:04 imap1 dovecot[41212]: auth-worker(41325): Error: mysql
(192.168.1.95): Connect failed to database (virtualusers): SSL conne
I am trying to use a stored procedure in sql for returning the various fields
for the user.
I'm concerned about what happens if the stored procedure fails to retrieve the
homedir and other fields, for whatever reason. What should it return to notify
dovecot of failure ? a single null field, all fi
What exactly stopped(will stop) working ? Generating through MacOS
Server which nobody should have been using anyways, or
the https://identity.apple.com/pushcert/caservice/new endpoint ?
Scott
On Wednesday, 08/01/2025 at 13:39 Michael Slusarz via dovecot wrote:
> On 01/08/2025 11:06 AM
Have you guys tried using XAPPLEPUSHSERVICE ?
I have that enabled and it doesn't even use IDLE.
Scott
On Tuesday, 07/01/2025 at 08:52 dovecot--- via dovecot wrote:
I think there are/were multiple issues, which confuses diagnosis. As a
workaround I had disabled imap-IDLE on my (Do
So what seems the be the consensus on what the issue is ?
What does the Stalwart patch do exactly - do you have a link for it ?
Scott
On Sunday, 05/01/2025 at 17:13 David Ferrero via dovecot wrote:
If you connect to imap with netcat assuming telnet isn’t an option
it will tell you what
Anyone that knows a bit about the dovecot internals.
is move in any way faster than copy / set deleted flag / expunge ?
Thanks!
Scott
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
Replace SA by rspamd ? SA is unbearably slow. You have 14 mx
hosts, get 14 rspamd vhosts and I doubt you'll have any issues.
Scott
On Friday, 29/11/2024 at 22:07 Laura Steynes via dovecot wrote:
Hi Scott,
On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 2:10 AM Scott Q. wrote:
> I see this thread is getti
on. We perform spam checks on the
DATA portion of the mail reception and can refuse a message in that
segment. Therefore, spam check is done on the message before accepting
it.
Scott
On Friday, 29/11/2024 at 10:28 Laura Steynes via dovecot wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 10:31 PM Marc
In all fairness here, Gmail/Outlook play by their own rules and
people just accept them because it's free.
Try sending a spam message that Gmail sends you, back to them and see
what happens.
Yeah.
On Tuesday, 26/11/2024 at 05:14 Marc via dovecot wrote:
> > >
> >
> > Your system reporting fa
You can also enable Application Passwords in Gmail and use those
via classic auth.
Also allow user to enable less secure apps, enable less secure apps as
the user, then add the app passwords.
Scott
On Thursday, 21/11/2024 at 08:07 Jan Naumann via dovecot wrote:
On 20.11.24 23:49, Joseph Tam
mming and phishing their own
customers to death because of their inadequate policies.
Finally I might add that the only real contender for e-mail is MS.
Google is getting dumped as well in the enterprise space because their
offer doesn't measure up to MS365.
Cheers,
Scott
On
Not everyone. The EU is pushing hard for data to stay local.
MS/Google will do what they know best: offer 0 support even to paying
customers and jack up the prices once the competition dries up.
There will always be alternatives.
Scott
On Monday, 18/11/2024 at 06:52 Marc via
l." ".")("Labels." ".")) (("shared." ".")) NIL
would make sense as both personal namespaces point to different
directory structures."
Reading the RFC I'm not understanding this at all, but then again,
maybe I'm wrong.
Anyone care to shed some light on how multiple namespaces should be
defined ?
Thank you,
Scott
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
these security
issues have prompted some firms, including the European Parliament
[6], to block the app on their Exchange servers"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Outlook_(mobile_app)
Stay away.
Scott
On Tuesday, 24/09/2024 at 03:31 Marc via dovecot wrote:
I don't think y
e slightly wrong before, we made it work more standard in
2.3.21
They were sent as URL parameters before, but it was changed into basic
auth instead.
Aki
> On 01/07/2024 20:06 EEST Scott Q. via dovecot wrote:
>
>
> Ok, thanks, what also works is leaving tokeninfo_url em
://keycloak.dev1:8443/realms/myrealm/protocol/openid-connect/userinfo
Aki
> On 01/07/2024 19:49 EEST Scott Q. via dovecot wrote:
>
>
> I'm on 2.3.21
>
> setting introspection_mode to auth causes tokeninfo url to have the
> token in both querystring & header.
>
> I&#x
4wvz8RBFc5f0ey-M8dLM00eq5h1EuUP02NUbaYzsfLkhejfBzMALGdQAvrEbrQ53RBcuiehVYNsOZ94ge9nhMLeNmMMRNpqYiUePLMYz-lmRqdFLKcx5OlvA3VM5pLctWsoHW7Gm0awckBzdw
Thanks,
Scott
On Monday, 01/07/2024 at 12:38 Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
> On 01/07/2024 19:29 EEST Scott Q. via dovecot wrote:
>
>
> Here goes another oauth2 question, hoping it won&#
Here goes another oauth2 question, hoping it won't be ignored
like all the others.
I want to use get/auth on tokeninfo_url but post on introspection_url
but dovecot doesn't let me. It doesn't add the auth header on
tokeninfo_url whenever introspection_mode == post
so, if introspection_mode = post
What's her point really ? That someone owes her up to date,
FREE, secure software that she wants to use in a commercial setting
?
This has been debated ad nauseum. Get your expectations in check.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38301710
On Wednesday, 26/06/2024 at 16:13 Simon B via dovecot
;s nothing more than
entitlement.
In your stead, I'd be happy and say thank you that a serious company
is making such a huge public/free contribution.
Cheers
On Wednesday, 26/06/2024 at 14:04 Laura Smith wrote:
I suggest you descent rapidly off your high horse Scott, for two
reasons:
Hi Laura,
I understand your frustration but if you are relying on Dovecot for a
commercial solution, I believe your anger is misguided. The open
source project has no duty nor do they have to guarantee anything.
Open source means everyone can contribute, but in this case, only one
major contributo
For what it's worth, I installed openssl 1.1.1w in a custom dir,
compiled dovecot 2.3.21 against it and it works like a charm against
our test suite and production load.
On Tuesday, 25/06/2024 at 11:08 Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
> On 25/06/2024 17:26 EEST Laura Smith via dovecot wrote:
>
>
You can switch to oauth2 and then each device will have a unique
client id that you can use to identify the culprit.
On Tuesday, 25/06/2024 at 07:29 Eirik Rye via dovecot wrote:
On 2024-06-25 12:00, hp--- via dovecot wrote:
> I am running Dovecot 2.3.21. One client has multiple computers in
the
Answering my own question. It works although it's not enough to
set compiler flags as per the docs to the custom openssl dir
I had to also add the library to ldconfig
Otherwise, it seems to work just fine.
Thank you all
On Wednesday, 19/06/2024 at 09:11 Scott Q. via dovecot wrote:
Than
Thank you Aki.
do you know if I can compile it against openssl1.1.1w and also use
mysql which is compiled against openssl 3.0 ?
On Wednesday, 19/06/2024 at 00:41 Aki Tuomi wrote:
> On 19/06/2024 06:58 EEST Scott Q. via dovecot wrote:
>
>
> I'm on Debian 12.5 which c
Thank you - just this patch ? Because I installed it and I get
the same behavior unfortunately...
On Wednesday, 19/06/2024 at 04:37 Daniel Lange via dovecot wrote:
Hi Scott,
Am 19.06.24 um 06:41 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot:
>
>> On 19/06/2024 06:58 EEST Scott Q. via dovec
I'm on Debian 12.5 which comes with openssl 3.0.11
I compiled Dovecot 2.3.21 with some pretty vanilla options:
/configure --prefix=/usr/local/dovecot --with-sql --with-mysql
--with-docs --with-ssl --without-shadow --without-pam --without-ldap
--without-pgsql --without-sqlite --with-systemd
systemu
"the cloud" = MS
Also some other apps do that too, like MyMail which is owned by mail.ru
-Original Message-
From: Marc
Sent: Saturday, August 5, 2023 5:35 AM
To: David Koski ; dovecot@dovecot.org
Cc: Terry Moore-Read ; lnev...@sutinen.com; Jon Johnson
Subject: RE: Outlook not showing
g and if I should file it as
such (?)
Thanks once again
From: Aki Tuomi via dovecot
Sent: Friday, August 4, 2023 9:43 AM
To: Scott ; dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: RE: Using / in folder names
You could test this out first on your test deployment. index layout is pretty
permissive as it
0.5.19 (4eae2f79)
# OS: Linux 6.1.0-10-amd64 x86_64 Debian 12.1 nfs
# Hostname: pstimport.emailarray.local
mail_location = maildir:/ssd_bkp/ingestmail/mail/%n@%d:BROKENCHAR=_:LAYOUT=index
From: Aki Tuomi via dovecot
Sent: Friday, August 4, 2023 9:43 AM
To: Scott ; dovecot@dovecot.
in the listescape plugin ?
Thank you for your assistance
From: Aki Tuomi via dovecot
Sent: Friday, August 4, 2023 8:40 AM
To: Scott ; dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: RE: Using / in folder names
You could try adding :BROKENCHAR=^
to mail location, or you could migrate to LAYOUT=index
must not have '/' characters (0.001 +
0.000 secs).
From: Aki Tuomi via dovecot
Sent: Friday, August 4, 2023 1:47 AM
To: Scott ; dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: Using / in folder names
On 04/08/2023 04:54 EEST Scott mailto:qm...@top-consulting.net> > wrote:
I could. But there's like 200 PSTs to import in total...
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Chris Wensink
Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2023 11:43 PM
To: Scott
Cc: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: Using / in folder names
Maybe this is over simplifying things but can you just open th
Is this possible at all ?
I am trying to import a PST file and it has a slash in the folder name.
Dovecot errors out with :
APPEND "Caixa de Entrada_VIDA/S1" (\Seen)
NO [CANNOT] Invalid mailbox name: Name must not have '/' characters
My namespace separator is the dot and I configured the listes
Is this assuming you log at some verbose level ? What if you log at WARN or
higher ?
For production it seems kind of silly to log search queries anyways.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: dovecot On Behalf Of John Fawcett
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2021 8:52 PM
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Why are you still going through Dovecot for this ?
@ 4.5 million messages you could just reprogram your app to search solr
directly, it will return the uid of the message and you can use that directly
in imap uid fetch.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: dovecot On Behalf Of Einar Bjarni
On 2021-10-29 12:05, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
Hello,
I've got some scripts that archive off mail that stopped working with
2.3.17. Specifically this worksin 2.3.16:
sudo -n /usr/local/bin/dsync -u dluke -m Sent -o
mail_location=mbox:~/tmp/ mirror maildir:~/Maildir/
but fails on 2.3.17 with the fo
I'm stuck with using Qmail which has no LMTP support, and thus I'm
using dovecot-lda which has certain drawbacks.
Has anyone found a way to direct dovecot-lda to deliver the mail to
the LMTP server or any other way for Qmail to deliver the mail to the
LMTP server directly ?
Thanks!
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 10:44 PM Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
>
> > On 25/05/2021 00:09 Scott Edwards wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> > I'm not on the maillist, please reply all.
> >
> > It's been a few years since I've setup a mail server (I fe
Hello,
I'm not on the maillist, please reply all.
It's been a few years since I've setup a mail server (I feel like a
noob!). The following syslog message is isolating the auth issues. I
have sqlite, and want to keep it this way. I don't see more than a few
mailboxes to setup until sometime later,
Hi Aki,
sorry for hijacking this thread, but when you do a SEARCH at least
there's an 'Indexing update' being returned from the server.
If the mailbox is not indexed and you do a SORT it just hangs with no
update whatsoever until it completes.
I think it would be beneficial to update the client
Is this the same bug that John created a patch for but then
Dovecot fixed differently in the latest version ?
The one with the assertion ? If so, I thought it was fixed, no ?
On Tuesday, 09/02/2021 at 17:32 Arjen Heidinga wrote:
On 08-02-2021 18:40, deano-dove...@areyes.com wrote:
>
> Do we
You can write something similar and I think others did already if
you Google for it. Shouldn't take you more than 1-2h to write
something in Perl:connect to backend, no login, remove from director
On Saturday, 16/01/2021 at 22:37 Steven Varco wrote:
Hi Christian
This confused me as well.
I la
On 2020-12-20 17:37, Philip Rhoades wrote:
@lbutlr,
On 2020-12-21 00:43, @lbutlr wrote:
On 20 Dec 2020, at 04:05, Philip Rhoades wrote:
I guess that is what it seems to look like to me as well - but what
does that mean for what I am trying to do? - ie reset the blue folder
highlight arbitra
m Apr 27 by
Stephan Bosch
https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/799b52accf71e86756dde738d22c1c6a500a7e29#diff-1c02b3481573ffd33c9abccd3f5a6752a5cd81ca83389f4380657f7309c06366
On Saturday, 31/10/2020 at 08:40 John Fawcett wrote:
On 31/10/2020 00:18, Scott Q. wrote:
I have implemented
John Fawcett wrote:
On 21/10/2020 16:44, Patrik Peng wrote:
On 16.10.20 18:34, Patrik Peng wrote:
On 16.10.20 18:00, Scott Q. wrote:
This reminds me, the way I was able to reproduce this consistently
was by having large headers ( 100+ lines ).
On Friday, 16/10/2020 at 11:49 Patrik
no spam/virus filtering ? Virtual suicide these days :P
On Monday, 26/10/2020 at 16:13 R. Diez wrote:
> Start of a HOWTO:
>
> 1) Install dovecot, create virtual accounts for all of your users
> 2) Install fetchmail, make it pull the ISPs IMAP and deliver locally
> 3) Install postfix as a smar
There's no ambiguity here, if you send a message, you are the
sender. The envelope from should be yours.
On Sunday, 25/10/2020 at 11:48 Marc Roos wrote:
Say someone has setup spf for his domain and sends an email to a user
that has in roundcube enabled the sieve forward. If the message is
for
This reminds me, the way I was able to reproduce this consistently
was by having large headers ( 100+ lines ).
On Friday, 16/10/2020 at 11:49 Patrik Peng wrote:
On 19.08.20 17:37, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 17:03:57 +0200, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Hi, after the
anged in
a long time, so I really don't know what to think.
On Thursday, 15/10/2020 at 09:59 Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2020-09-07, Scott Q. wrote:
>
> Not sure if I mentioned it but I'm on FreeBSD too. I wonder if any
> of the patches FreeBSD applies automatically is causing
On Tuesday, 22/09/2020 at 02:33 Aki Tuomi wrote:
On 18.9.2020 17.45, Scott Q. wrote:
> Does anyone know if it's possible to do FTS Index based on a userdb
> preference ? Basically if the preference is 'on' , dovecot goes
ahead
> with the fts indexing for that particular use
Does anyone know if it's possible to do FTS Index based on a
userdb preference ? Basically if the preference is 'on' , dovecot goes
ahead with the fts indexing for that particular user.
I'm guessing right now it's not possible but is there anyone that
could envision writing such a patch ? If so, c
some reason, but I hope there is no difference with
single drive.
Thank you
Milo
Dne 09.09.2020 v 15:51 Scott Q. napsal(a):
> The 9361-8i does support passthrough ( JBOD mode ). Make sure you
have
> the latest firmware.
The 9361-8i does support passthrough ( JBOD mode ). Make sure you
have the latest firmware.
On Wednesday, 09/09/2020 at 03:55 Miloslav Hůla wrote:
Hi, thank you for your reply. I'll continue inline...
Dne 09.09.2020 v 3:15 John Stoffel napsal(a):
> Miloslav> Hello,
> Miloslav> I sent this into
Here's a few tips:
1. I assume that's a 2U format -24 bays. You only have 1 raid card
for all 24 disks ? Granted you only have 16, but usually you should
assign 1 card per 8 drives. In our standard 2U chassis we have 3 hba's
per 8 drives. Your backplane should support that.
2. Add more drives
3. G
Not sure if I mentioned it but I'm on FreeBSD too. I wonder if any
of the patches FreeBSD applies automatically is causing this. I looked
through them but couldn't find anything obvious that might cause this
--- configure.orig 2020-08-12 12:20:51 UTC
+++ configure
@@ -28901,13 +28901,13 @@ fi
I've actually done a lot of debugging on this and it has to do
with very large headers in e-mails.
I've sent to Jeff the full GDB debug output and from what I gathered
myself, I can replicate the bug 100% of the time when I send a message
with 100 header lines of
x-locaweb-id:
TsKSlv8kr1xtXZssG
15:07:37 -0400, Scott Q. wrote:
> Sorry to bump up an old thread.
>
> 2.3.11.3 already contains this patch and the error still gets
> generated.
I'm not sure where you are finding it. The below patch isn't on the
release-2.3.11 branch. It isn't in the 2.3.11.3 tar
Sorry to bump up an old thread.
2.3.11.3 already contains this patch and the error still gets
generated.
Anything else we could try ?
Scott
On Wednesday, 19/08/2020 at 11:37 Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 17:03:57 +0200, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
modularity in modern
open-source software. 🙂
Thanks,
Scott
From: dovecot on behalf of Mark Constable
Sent: June 13, 2020 8:52 PM
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: Send SPF SoftFails to Junk
On 14/6/20 8:07 am, Scott A. Wozny wrote:
> Messages f
ity and I need
to look around my Thunderbird settings? I suppose it's also possible that
Postfix needed to do something beyond adding the Received-SPF line in the
message header, but I didn't see anything about that in the Policy-SPF config.
This is my first foray into SPF so I'm open to any suggestions.
Thanks,
Scott
overthinking this. :)
Thanks,
Scott
rt =
Sent: June 5, 2020 1:44 AM
To: Scott A. Wozny ; dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: Cannot log in to IMAP server and logs are unclear as to why
Hi!
I tried with your config and I got:
Jun 05 08:43:30 auth-worker(11465): Error: passwd-file /etc/dovecot/users: User
t...@test.com is missing u
now to try and narrow down / correct the errors.
Thanks,
Scott
From: Aki Tuomi
Sent: June 4, 2020 3:14 AM
To: Scott A. Wozny ; dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: Cannot log in to IMAP server and logs are unclear as to why
> On 04/06/2020 02:51 Sco
et them at the system level, so why is the system
telling me the user was not found? This definitely isn’t my first rodeo with
Linux, but I know almost nothing about messaging so in that regard I’m a
totally n00b and would really appreciate some guidance.
Thanks,
Scott
Why do you use regex ?
You can just use matches:
https://p5r.uk/blog/2011/sieve-tutorial.html#matchtype
(https://p5r.uk/blog/2011/sieve-tutorial.html#matchtype)
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 03:31 AM, subin ks via dovecot wrote: I've Dovecot and
dovecot-sieve v 2.2.27 installed on a Debian 9.6. I'm
I am trying to add a signature to all messages and it should be possible via
vnd.dovecot.filter, the problem is that any script I try to filter through just
hangs.
I am running on FreeBSD 11.2 and I tried with dovecot 2.2.32 & pigeonhole
0.4.19 and with dovecot 2.3.2 && pigeonhole 0.5.2. In both
On 2018-08-10 18:08, Larry Rosenman wrote:
service stats {
unix_listener stats-reader {
group = mail
mode = 0666
user =
}
unix_listener stats-writer {
group = mail
mode = 0666
user =
}
}
service anvil {
unix_listener anvil {
group = mail
mode = 0666
}
}
I have seen this thread about being able to run doveadm as a non-root
user, but I don't understand the solution even though I have seen other
pages give this link as the solution.
http://bit.ly/2MC5oq9
What configuration is necessary so that I can set the permissions on
/var/run/dovecot/stats
bounced message problem was recently discovered.
If anyone has seen this error and knows the solution, I would appreciate
the help.
Thank You.
Scott
Software is Centos7, Dovecot 2.2.10
>Use that single mailbox with IMAP, others stay to POP
Thanks, I considered that and looked up the ways to restrict IMAP access. But:
How will the IMAP account behave with the current mail_location setting below?
mail_location = mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/mail
understand that will delete on
their devices, too.
How do other's deal with this? Am I misunderstanding something? As popular as
it seems to be, these seem like big hurdles to overcome. Appreciate some help
for a IMAP noob.
Thanks,
Scott
serdb block completely.
>
> Aki
>
> > On August 30, 2016 at 7:02 PM "Scott W. Sander"
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Forgive me, I'm a novice. Consider that today I have already set up a
> > working postfix + Dovecot server with userdb using the static d
ould
prevent me from being able to use doveadm expunge -A and doveadm search -A.
Thank you!
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 1:07 AM Stefán Tamás wrote:
> 2016. 08. 29, hétfő keltezéssel 19.40-kor Scott W. Sander ezt írta:
>
> > userdb {
> > args = uid=vmail gid=vmail home=/var/m
ng out old email automatically.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 4:13 PM Joseph Tam wrote:
> "Scott W. Sander" writes:
>
> > A few of the mailboxes in Dovecot receive hundreds of emails per day.
> I'd
> > like to automatically remove all emails in all mailboxes and ma
I am using a postfix + Dovecot server as a test mail server for which some
applications in our test environment use as a target to deliver email so
that our real endusers don't receive messages from our test servers.
A few of the mailboxes in Dovecot receive hundreds of emails per day. I'd
like t
dovecot/10-master.conf and reloading the
configuration.
Easy-peasy, just doesn't appear to be well documented.
---
Scott
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 7:35 PM Edgar Pettijohn
wrote:
> I'm chiming in kind of late, but what's in /etc/hostname?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> &g
uot;hostname = mail.domain.test", and now the received
headers show:
Received: from mail.domain.test by mail.domain.test (Dovecot) with LMTP id
So it seems that "hostname" is a valid, respected Dovecot directive.
---
Scott
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:58 AM Sami Ketola wrote:
>
used in the lmtp
> received headers is
> fetched from environment variable DOVECOT_HOSTDOMAIN and if that is not
> defined
> gethostbyname() is used.
>
> You can try setting that prior launching dovecot.
>
> Sami
>
>
> > On 19 Aug 2016, at 21:43, Scott W. San
ay the FQDN of the actual
host server that is running Dovecot.
The server currently referenced as "mail.domain.test" in the headers is
postfix running on the same machine.
Thanks in advance!
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 7:11 PM Joseph Tam wrote:
> "Scott W. Sander" writes:
>
&g
I have noticed that the name of my private server running dovecot appears
in email headers rather than the public-friendly name of my server.
Is there a method to specify an alternate server name for the dovecot
server to use for itself in the dovecot configuration files? I performed a
few Google
In syslog, I frequently see messages such as: "dovecot: imap(user):
Disconnected for inactivity" I understand why these happen, but is there anyway
to configure logging to suppress these messages?
I am working on setting up dovecot 2.2.12 with an installed qmail +
vpopmail 5.5.0 base. So far I have not had much luck getting the auth to
work with vpopmail. Does dovecot 2.2.12 work with vpopmail 5.5.0? So far
when I try to authenticate I always get back User Unknown in the log.
Thanks
2013 5:52 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.12.2013 11:37, schrieb Scott Galambos:
i wonder if Timo sooner or later accepts that this is a *major bug*
no userland-software on this planet needs to track mount-points
at least not as default, at least not this way
the last time i borught this up the excuse
I'm running dovecot 2.2.5 and would like to completely turn off all
automatic adding of mount points. So var/lib/dovecot/mounts would be
empty essentially.
Is this possible? Somehow dovecot always adds a mount point that does
not exist and was removed a long time ago.I've dove:
dovead
On 9/13/2013 2:40 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
"passwd-file" is similiar to "passwd", but I don't know, if you break
something (outside Dovecot), if you add the last field to /etc/passwd.
Because Dovecot supports multiple userdb's, you could add a passwd-file
user
iser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013, Scott Galambos wrote:
Testing any given user gives:
$: dovecot user sarah
field value
uid 1478
gid 116
home/home/sarah
mailmbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/mail/sarah
system_groups_user sarah
What would
Hello, I'm running the latest version of dovecot on Linux with mbox
mailboxes. Everything works fine. So in my dovecot config I have
mail_location = mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u
I would like to now change the mail_location for one user in an attempt
to slowly migrate to Maildir format. I'
Hello, I'm attempting to move form qpopper 4.1 to Dovecot 2.2.5 on
Linux. When a user checks POP mail qpopper seems to make a
.username.pop temporary file in the same /var/mail directory as the mbox
INBOX file. Watching what dovecot does I don't see this happening.
Is this .pop file a lock f
see in the following mailing list thread:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://dovecot.markmail.org/**message/mjurv4fp4w65u2ib?q=**
>>>> Dovecot+LDA+LDAP+lookups+on+**samba4+server+ends+very+often+**
>>>> in+timeouts<http://do
a login tohuw [myPassword] returns "NO [AUTHENTICATIONFAILED]
Authentication failed." I believe I'm missing a configuration detail, but
what?
info.log: http://pastebin.ca/2388873
debug.log: http://pastebin.ca/2388872
error.log: http://pastebin.ca/2388871
dovecot -n: http://pastebin.ca/2388870
>
> 2. I understand that I also have to instruct my MDA (procmail) to deliver mail
> to the new location. I found that I have to create an /etc/procmailrc with the
> following line:
>
>> DEFAULT=$HOME/Maildir/
>
> My question is: Some users have their own .procmailrc file inside their home
> di
specific to CentOS?
Any help appreciated - happy to read up on it myself, but would need a pointer,
since the docs so far either assume I get an imap-login line for failed logins
which I dont, or they assume I just want to see the repeated attempts/passwords.
Scott.
on 7/24/2012 7:51 AM Steve Platt spake the following:
> We have a user who wants to use Outlook with our Dovecot IMAP server but
> doesn't like the way Outlook handles deletion with IMAP.
>
> Ironically she would like Outlook to move the message to her Trash folder,
> just like Outlook does with "
on 6/26/2012 2:19 PM Jonathan Ryshpan spake the following:
> On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 13:48 -0700, Scott Silva wrote:
>> on 6/26/2012 1:35 PM Jonathan Ryshpan spake the following:
>>> I'm trying to set up a dovecot server for which mail arrives in an mbox,
>>> and m
on 6/26/2012 1:35 PM Jonathan Ryshpan spake the following:
> I'm trying to set up a dovecot server for which mail arrives in an mbox,
> and mail is stored in a maildir. The wiki (see
> http://wiki.dovecot.org/Namespaces) refers to this as "Mixed mbox and
> Maildir". It advises handling this situa
Thanks for the advise - it worked a treat!
Glad to finally have this sieve stuff under control, after weeks of trying to
get it working :)
From: Stephan Bosch
To: Duane Hill
Cc: dovecot@dovecot.org
Sent: Tuesday, 13 December 2011 3:25 AM
Subject: Re: [Doveco
all of joeuser@mydomain's incoming mail to
somewhere like joeusersbac...@gmail.com, for backup reasons. One day, I'll work
out how to configure postfix to do this for all outgoing email too, but that's
for another day :)
Below are what my .conf files look like. Thanks in advance,
S
anks again,
Scott
- Forwarded Message -
From: Scott Lewis
To: "dovecot@dovecot.org"
Sent: Thursday, 3 November 2011 4:31 PM
Subject: patching dovecot for sieve/managesieve support, centos 5.6?
Hi all,
I am having real trouble when attempting to patch dovecot 1.2 to include the
Pidgeon
1 - 100 of 413 matches
Mail list logo
