Am 31.05.2017 um 16:35 schrieb Timo Sirainen:
On 31 May 2017, at 16.53, Reindl Harald <mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net>> wrote:
LTO build is as broken as 2.2.30
libtool: link: ( cd ".libs" && rm -f "lib10_quota_plugin.la" && ln -s
"../lib
Am 31.05.2017 um 17:19 schrieb Timo Sirainen:
On 31 May 2017, at 18.03, Reindl Harald wrote:
libtool: link: ( cd ".libs" && rm -f "lib10_quota_plugin.la" && ln -s
"../lib10_quota_plugin.la" "lib10_quota_plugin.la" )
/tmp/ccGO7JSw.ltr
Am 31.05.2017 um 15:24 schrieb Timo Sirainen:
https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.30.1.tar.gz
https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.30.1.tar.gz.sig
Due to some release process changes I didn't notice that one important bugfix
wasn't included in the v2.2.30 release branch before
Am 03.04.2015 um 21:14 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
Andreas Kasenides skrev den 2015-04-03 15:53:
Please share. I know its easy to do, but share anyway!
require ["imap4flags"];
# rule:[h.rei...@thelounge.net]
if header :contains "From" "h.rei...@thelounge.net"
{
addflag "\\Seen";
}
this don
Am 03.04.2015 um 15:53 schrieb Andreas Kasenides:
On 03/04/15 16:09, Jerry wrote:
On Fri, 03 Apr 2015 08:42:42 -0400, Charles Marcus stated:
People, PLEASE do not engage Reindl on the list, it always results in
this kind of garbage that the adults on the list could do without.
If you feel c
/msg91823.html
On 4/3/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 02.04.2015 um 18:19 schrieb Jogi Hofmüller:
Am 2015-04-02 um 17:49 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 02.04.2015 um 14:30 schrieb Edwardo Garcia:
On 4/1/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.04.2015 um 14:33 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch:
On Mit, 2015-04-01 at
Am 02.04.2015 um 18:19 schrieb Jogi Hofmüller:
Am 2015-04-02 um 17:49 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 02.04.2015 um 14:30 schrieb Edwardo Garcia:
On 4/1/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.04.2015 um 14:33 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch:
On Mit, 2015-04-01 at 13:07 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am
Am 02.04.2015 um 14:30 schrieb Edwardo Garcia:
On 4/1/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.04.2015 um 14:33 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch:
On Mit, 2015-04-01 at 13:07 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.04.2015 um 13:04 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch:
IMHO the larger the corporation is, the less are the
Am 01.04.2015 um 14:33 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch:
On Mit, 2015-04-01 at 13:07 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.04.2015 um 13:04 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch:
IMHO the larger the corporation is, the less are the chances for
*long-term* benefits of the OSS/free software (mainly because: usually
Am 01.04.2015 um 13:04 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch:
IMHO the larger the corporation is, the less are the chances for
*long-term* benefits of the OSS/free software (mainly because: usually
commercial success is driven and defined from marketing to sales[1] sown
to the techies which are forced into
Am 30.03.2015 um 11:41 schrieb Christian Kivalo:
On 2015-03-30 11:25, Reindl Harald wrote:
is there a way to expresse when the header "X-Spam-Status" *do not*
exist move the message to a different folder?
:contains, :matches and :is are not helpful here
Have you tried using
is there a way to expresse when the header "X-Spam-Status" *do not*
exist move the message to a different folder?
:contains, :matches and :is are not helpful here
background:
the spamass-milter option -B is lacking the spamassassin headers in case
of milter-rejects and via sendmail generated B
Am 28.03.2015 um 18:02 schrieb zu...@systemschmiede.com:
Well...That seemed to have worked in fact.
Updated to 2:2.2.16-1~auto+36.
"All folders"-search works, and no errors are being shown. Besides, the
all folder search in Open-Xchange looks great and is lightning fast!
well, the first step
Am 27.03.2015 um 15:04 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
Gedalya skrev den 2015-03-27 14:48:
is it possible to configure configure haproxy to work with postfix
sasl and dovecot auth like this:
clients -> 25:postfix -> 20025:haproxy -> 20025:auth-backend-1,
20025:auth-backend-2
Why don't you set up a do
Am 27.03.2015 um 14:49 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
What I need is to make smtp authentication balanced and keep
everything in backend (private network)
dovecot is not a smtp server, thats why i say cyrus-sasl
jesus christ keep your smart-ass responses for yourself
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/
Am 25.03.2015 um 20:34 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
Brad Smith skrev den 2015-03-25 20:20:
only paid here by compileing time, still have dovecot v1 working, so
open source it not complete free, as long it compiles fine i am happy
Not making any sense.
punktum ?
"only paid here by compileing
Am 25.03.2015 um 18:28 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
Reindl Harald skrev den 2015-03-25 18:08:
with your argumentation making a shit would also not be completly free
because you need to pinch ass bakes.
and you write this on public walls?
DON'T QUOTE OUT OF CONTEXT BOY, YOU HAVE MISSED
Am 25.03.2015 um 18:03 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
Brad Smith skrev den 2015-03-25 16:58:
On 03/25/15 08:46, Peter Chiochetti wrote:
Am 25.03.2015 um 13:23 schrieb Nick Edwards:
So there *is* a chance it will be commercialised
Hasn't it been commercial for a long time?
When was the last time yo
Am 25.03.2015 um 16:58 schrieb Brad Smith:
On 03/25/15 08:46, Peter Chiochetti wrote:
Am 25.03.2015 um 13:23 schrieb Nick Edwards:
So there *is* a chance it will be commercialised
Hasn't it been commercial for a long time?
When was the last time you paid for Dovecot? The base product is
o
Am 21.03.2015 um 12:12 schrieb James:
On 21/03/2015 11:07, Reindl Harald wrote:
well, remove that brickage of "special compile"
I'm sorry but I did not understand your comment
why do you compile openssl that way?
What way? With or without ssl3? I've now done it
Am 21.03.2015 um 12:02 schrieb James:
On 21/03/2015 10:55, Reindl Harald wrote:
well, remove that brickage of "special compile"
I'm sorry but I did not understand your comment
why do you compile openssl that way?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Am 21.03.2015 um 11:51 schrieb James:
On 21/03/2015 10:00, James wrote:
the "SSL23_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:unsupported protocol" seems to do what I
thought the ssl_protocols setting did.
Do I still need, if I ever needed, the "ssl_protocols = " setting?
All these ssl_* settings just go to OpenSSL
Am 18.03.2015 um 20:56 schrieb Conrad Kostecki:
Am 2015-03-18 20:46, schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 18.03.2015 um 20:40 schrieb Conrad Kostecki:
Hi!
Currently, the passwords are stored in plaintext for my dovecot, as I am
still using cram-md5 AND digest-md5.
I have still to offer that, as I have
Am 18.03.2015 um 20:40 schrieb Conrad Kostecki:
Hi!
Currently, the passwords are stored in plaintext for my dovecot, as I am
still using cram-md5 AND digest-md5.
I have still to offer that, as I have some deprecated clients,
therefore, I am unable to hash at least those passwords for that accoun
Am 13.03.2015 um 14:29 schrieb Cliff Hayes:
I looked in the place where dovecot logs everything ... the maillog.
I didn't see anything but the log is huge and I could have easily missed
it.
Is there a certain error or phrase I should look for?
If so please advise.
man grep
grep -i 'sync' mail
Am 13.03.2015 um 11:23 schrieb Timo Sirainen:
On 12 Mar 2015, at 21:09, Reindl Harald wrote:
/usr/lib64/dovecot/stats/libstats_mail.so
why in the world a new sub-directory containing just one so-file enforcing
pakcage buildsers to change SPEC files?
So that external plugins can add more
/usr/lib64/dovecot/stats/libstats_mail.so
why in the world a new sub-directory containing just one so-file
enforcing pakcage buildsers to change SPEC files?
Am 12.03.2015 um 18:30 schrieb Timo Sirainen:
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.16.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dove
Am 12.03.2015 um 15:18 schrieb Hardy Flor:
I want running servers, not with each new version have to compile.
well, rpm-SPECs allow including of patches
if you rely on distribution packages you won't see a update even if
upstream would introduce a config option for years
Am 12.03.2015 um
Am 12.03.2015 um 15:07 schrieb Dan LaSota:
Getting "Segmentation Fault" When I run doveconf -a
i don't
in other words: bad for you but what's the purpose of the information
without any debugging like strace?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
setup
2015-03-11 15:41 GMT+01:00 Reindl Harald :
Am 11.03.2015 um 15:37 schrieb kaniggl:
To make it clear, architecture is PowerPC 64bit
Then i installed dovecot via apt-get. But the file
/usr/lib/dovecot/modules/auth/libdriver_mysql.so
is missing.
install the sub-package "dovecot-mysq
Am 11.03.2015 um 15:37 schrieb kaniggl:
To make it clear, architecture is PowerPC 64bit
Then i installed dovecot via apt-get. But the file
/usr/lib/dovecot/modules/auth/libdriver_mysql.so
is missing.
install the sub-package "dovecot-mysql" and the next time *ask before*
you ruin your system
Am 06.03.2015 um 14:59 schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt:
* Reindl Harald :
lmtp_destination_concurrency_limit on postfix side
It's not a postfix issue. postfix is merely reporting what Dovecot said
i know that on my own since i can read maillogs :-)
anyways, we even use a lmtp concurrency
Am 06.03.2015 um 14:44 schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt:
I updated dovecot today and all over a sudden I'm getting:
Mar 6 14:40:46 mail postfix/lmtp[3150]: 3kz95y3nX3zCtTS:
to=, relay=127.0.0.1[private/dovecot-lmtp],
delay=88, delays=87/0.94/0.01/0.01, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (host
127.0.0.1[priva
Am 05.03.2015 um 22:45 schrieb Steffen:
Steffen Kaiser wrote:
passdb { driver = ipdeny args = /matchpattern/action
*** }
With next passdb{} as 1st in chain:
passdb {
driver = checkpassword
args = "/tmp/chktst ip=%r service=%s"
result_success = continue
result_failure = retu
Am 05.03.2015 um 20:23 schrieb @lbutlr:
On 04 Mar 2015, at 21:46 , Jim Pazarena wrote:
On 2015-03-02 2:02 AM, Jochen Bern wrote:
On 03/01/2015 08:53 AM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
I wonder if there is an easy way to provide dovecot a flat text file of
ipv4 #'s which should be ignored or dropped?
Am 04.03.2015 um 23:00 schrieb Felix Zandanel:
I am not against block lists. I just say their use should be justified as they may
decrease overall service quality as well. There is another solution for auth based
services: As soon as you detect a possible attack (# auth reqs > x etc.), keep
t
Am 04.03.2015 um 21:51 schrieb Oliver Welter:
Please add this support to iptables instead of Dovecot. It's a
waste of
effort to code it into every application that listens on the network.
Would you care to integrate it into IOS on my Cisco as well?
There are things connected to
Am 04.03.2015 um 20:12 schrieb Michael Orlitzky:
On 03/03/2015 11:03 PM, Earl Killian wrote:
On 2015/3/2 10:03, Reindl Harald wrote:
that is all nice
but the main benefit of RBL's is always ignored:
* centralized
* no log parsing at all
* honeypot data are "delivered" to
ue on POP3/IMAP after locked out from postfix without write
firewall rules
the whole point of a *locally administered* RBL is that you don't need
to care about hown many mailservers you have and where they are nor need
you to open security holes between them for sharing data
On 03/03/2015
Am 03.03.2015 um 22:31 schrieb Oliver Welter:
I did a quick hack for exactly this purpose - send offending IPs from my
mail server to the firewall "in a secure way". Its a python script that
uses the fail2ban syntax on the one end and feeds a (patched) pfSense on
the other end. You can find the
Am 03.03.2015 um 00:45 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
On March 2, 2015 10:50:59 PM Dave McGuire wrote:
On 03/02/2015 05:34 AM, Joseph Tam wrote:
>>> http://wiki2.dovecot.org/PasswordDatabase/ExtraFields/AllowNets
its not a big hint its not called denynets is it ?
I myself just want a mechanism
Am 02.03.2015 um 19:53 schrieb Dan LaSota:
still doesn't work:
Mar 2 04:58:48 mail dovecot: auth-worker(5745): Error: mysql(127.0.0.1):
Connect failed to database (servermail): Access denied for user
'usermail'@'localhost' (using password: YES) - waiting for 1 seconds before
retry
that i
Am 02.03.2015 um 19:30 schrieb Dan LaSota:
Just some quick ideas
* check if the mysql socket file has rw permissions for the dovecot user
# ls -l /var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock
srwxrwxrwx. 1 mysql mysql 0 Mar 1 19:33 /var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock
that's not the problem
I have tried with
connect =
Am 02.03.2015 um 18:56 schrieb Robert Schetterer:
perhaps and i mean really "perhaps" go this way
https://sys4.de/de/blog/2014/03/27/fighting-smtp-auth-brute-force-attacks/
https://sys4.de/de/blog/2012/12/28/botnets-mit-rsyslog-und-iptables-recent-modul-abwehren/
45K+ IPs will work in a recen
Am 02.03.2015 um 11:02 schrieb Jochen Bern:
On 03/01/2015 08:53 AM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
I wonder if there is an easy way to provide dovecot a flat text file of
ipv4 #'s which should be ignored or dropped?
I have accumulated 45,000+ IPs which routinely try dictionary and
12345678 password atte
Am 02.03.2015 um 10:33 schrieb Steffen Kaiser:
hence RBL's make sense in the core because *in front* of any other
protocol specific code
That's TCP wrapper or a firewall, IMHO. (for a file list, not RBL).
However, there used to be a RBL patch for TCP wrapper and some
distribution provide other
Am 02.03.2015 um 10:06 schrieb Steffen Kaiser:
If such plugin(?) is available, I would expect immediate complains, it
does not support:
+ local file lists with various sets of syntaxes
+ RBLs with a fine grained response matching
+ use the same RBL response for multiple match-action pairs
or
Am 02.03.2015 um 08:38 schrieb Oliver Welter:
I am really tired of reading this kind of complaints on OSS lists.
and because it's free everybody has to shut up?
that's your defintion of free?
your definition is broken?
as said on a other list:
if the developer of the OSS sais "listen, i am
Am 02.03.2015 um 00:08 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
On March 1, 2015 10:26:40 AM Reindl Harald wrote:
i guess for a C-programmer it takes not much more than 10 minutens
include a config option to list rbl servers and close connections absed
on the DNS responses
close pop3, set imap to listen
Am 01.03.2015 um 23:16 schrieb Dave McGuire:
On 03/01/2015 04:25 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
I wonder if there is an easy way to provide dovecot a flat text
file of ipv4 #'s which should be ignored or dropped?
I have accumulated 45,000+ IPs which routinely try dictionary
and 12345678 pas
Am 01.03.2015 um 08:53 schrieb Jim Pazarena:
I wonder if there is an easy way to provide dovecot a flat text file of
ipv4 #'s which should be ignored or dropped?
I have accumulated 45,000+ IPs which routinely try dictionary and
12345678 password attempts. The file is too big to create firewall
Am 24.02.2015 um 19:48 schrieb Adrian Minta:
On 24.02.2015 20:40, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 24.02.2015 um 19:37 schrieb Adrian Minta:
On 24.02.2015 20:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
don't allow senders which you would not receive mail for - period
Seems interesting, at least until the
Am 24.02.2015 um 19:37 schrieb Adrian Minta:
On 24.02.2015 20:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
don't allow senders which you would not receive mail for - period
Seems interesting, at least until the bots adapt to this.
Any idea how could this be implemented?
with the configuration i have p
Am 24.02.2015 um 19:20 schrieb Luciano Mannucci:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 19:00:32 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
so you allow random envelope senders on your servers?
why?
I know it is not necessarily a good idea... :)
It is basicaly to allow fake home addresses from the office for some
managers
Am 24.02.2015 um 19:04 schrieb Luciano Mannucci:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 18:56:03 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
* if you cahnge the pwd SASL auth is taken away
True.
But this way the user will be unable to read his/her mail, including
my message saying "Hey, you've got a new virus!
Am 24.02.2015 um 18:28 schrieb Luciano Mannucci:
for the virus doesn't necessarily use the e-mail of the
user as its from, just the user and password for the
authentication phase
so you allow random envelope senders on your servers?
why?
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks
rejec
Am 24.02.2015 um 18:28 schrieb Luciano Mannucci:
I have a few users that are often hit by a trojan virus that steals
e-mail user and password. Having a very little (if not null) power on
their machines, I need to be able to block the outgoing mail wich is
handled by postfix via dovecot SASL.
Blo
Am 20.02.2015 um 15:03 schrieb Charles Marcus:
On 2/19/2015 4:34 PM, Santiago Vila wrote:
In such case we would love to know what is the commit that fixed this,
so that we can apply it to the 2.2.13 version in Debian. We have
frozen the distribution as we are about to release jessie as Debian
t the packet filter, sooner or later somebody
will change something without realize the impact and hence if it comes
to security put at least 2 safety nets in front of server ports
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 18.02.2015 um 18:20 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 18.0
Am 18.02.2015 um 18:20 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 18.02.2015 um 18:15 schrieb Robert Fantini:
I'm trying to figure out the exact line to put to /etc/postfix/main.cf
for local lmtp deliver we use:
mailbox_transport = *lmtp:unix:private/dovecot-lmtp*
for remote it is supposed
Am 18.02.2015 um 18:15 schrieb Robert Fantini:
I'm trying to figure out the exact line to put to /etc/postfix/main.cf
for local lmtp deliver we use:
mailbox_transport = *lmtp:unix:private/dovecot-lmtp*
for remote it is supposed to be:* lmtp:host:port*
yet at the remote lmtp does not use por
the lmtpd on localhost is reachable
365/7/24 and hence any sane MTA handles errors properly
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 17.02.2015 um 22:29 schrieb Robert Fantini:
we are using version 2.2.13 on debian.
currently imap runs on the same system a
Am 17.02.2015 um 22:29 schrieb Robert Fantini:
we are using version 2.2.13 on debian.
currently imap runs on the same system as postfix , spamassassin and
other mail related software.
I'd like to move dovecot imapd and mail storage to its own system.
I've search google and wiki an
n for those programs suggests putting the CRLs in a
separate file (e.g. apache SSLCARevocationFile) or doesn't talk about putting
CRLs in with the certs (e.g. postfix smtpd_tls_cert_file). If it works to put
them all in one file for those programs, that's good to know.
On 2015/2/16 07
Am 16.02.2015 um 15:53 schrieb dove...@lists.killian.com:
Why not /etc/dovecot/private? That's where I put my dovecot certs. Dovecot's
needs are a bit different from other software, and so it is unclear whether the
files won't be unique to it. For example, I haven't seen the following before I
Am 10.02.2015 um 16:35 schrieb The Doctor:
Quick question.
We are using both IMAP and POP#.
Question :
how can you avoid retrieving an e-mail that has been already retrieved?
by just rsync the complete data from the old to the new server
* first rsync hot while servicers running
* stop serv
Am 09.02.2015 um 22:29 schrieb Leander Schäfer:
I'm currently busy with a substiution of my current mail server. I'm
currently using
* Clam-SMTP and
* SpamAssassin
to fight Spam. I wonder if it is worth implementing AmaViS with
SpamAssassin backend instead and also using AmaViS to speak to
Am 06.02.2015 um 23:13 schrieb SW:
According to https://cipherli.st/
ssl = yes
ssl_cert = Dovecot 2.2.6
Is what you want.
Ok, so I have changed my ssl_cipher_list to: ssl_cipher_list =
AES128+EECDH:AES128+EDH
Before I made this change clients were connecting with the following
cipher in th
how do you come to the conclusion that it matters how busy "this server
is"? jesus christ you are asking *remote servers* for their answers and
the request as well the answer passes different routers, ISP's and
likely a *chain of forwarders* until you don't recursion at your own and
even if you
Am 02.02.2015 um 18:17 schrieb Juan Bernhard:
Am 02.02.2015 um 18:07 schrieb Juan Bernhard:
Hello list. I'm thinking to migrate the hole user db from system users
to mysql. I already did it in a test environment, but something is
annoying my OCD... I don't quote the variables username and passw
Am 02.02.2015 um 18:07 schrieb Juan Bernhard:
Hello list. I'm thinking to migrate the hole user db from system users
to mysql. I already did it in a test environment, but something is
annoying my OCD... I don't quote the variables username and password
sent to the mysql server. I know, the mysql
Am 01.02.2015 um 22:44 schrieb ML mail:
Thanks for your tip regarding the busy network.
I am using a one year old Cisco Catalyst 2960S (WS-C2960S-48TD-L) with cat6e
cables and my network should not be overloaded as far as I know. My mailbox and
mail proxy servers are on two different virtual
Am 26.01.2015 um 15:22 schrieb Leander Schäfer:
I couldn't find working solutions for this anomalie on the net. What
does this mean and does someone know how to fix this?
postfix/smtpd[18757]: improper command pipelining after EHLO from
unknown[192.168.10.233]: QUIT\r\n
that's hardly a doveco
Am 26.01.2015 um 10:52 schrieb Stéphane Cottin:
Le 26 janv. 2015 à 10:09, Reindl Harald a écrit :
You're stilling going to lose contents. If dspam fails, the mail
is dumped, the LDA returns exit code 75, and the MTA will probably
issue a bounce Email to the sender.
which would be O
Am 26.01.2015 um 08:52 schrieb Steffen Kaiser:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2015, Joseph Tam wrote:
St?phane Cottin writes:
dspam already send errors to syslog, the point here is to never loose
email contents. This was a wrong design, i'm now use a wrapper instead
( see my previous post for details ).
Am 26.01.2015 um 02:13 schrieb Leander Schäfer:
I just checked my ulimit again and it really seems like it has more
than enough - so I still don't understand what I've configured wrong
here ;/
root@WM-01 [~]$ su -m dovecot -c "ulimit -a"
socket buffer size (bytes, -b) unlimited
core file
Am 23.01.2015 um 16:06 schrieb John Hendrich:
I'm using Postfix and Dovecot 2.0.19 and Virtual domains & users
(mysql). Incoming mail is handled by Postfix and then handed off to
Dovecot LMTP for delivery. However, the Sender and Date are essentially
null when viewing the email with either the
Am 18.01.2015 um 12:07 schrieb Jerry:
I have:
ssl_cipher_list = ALL:!LOW:!SSLv2:!SSLv3:!EXP:!aNULL
and Outlook 2013 works fine
but you break *for sure* older clients and should *not* recommend that
broken setup untested and believe you are helping with it
!SSLv3 has no business in the ciph
Am 16.01.2015 um 12:24 schrieb Oliver Welter:
after adding TLSv1.2 to by TLS options
how did you do that?
there is no need to add it as long you did not break
your configuration intentional the time before
a lot of Outlook users complaint about connection errors,
openssl s_client and Thund
Am 16.01.2015 um 09:46 schrieb ML mail:
Thanks to your help Steffen I was able to find out the issue which was simply
the size of the Spam mail as you can see here:
spamc[16545]: skipped message, greater than max message size (512000 bytes)
The spam mail was around 900 kbytes as such I have c
Am 14.01.2015 um 02:40 schrieb Robert Blayzor:
On Jan 13, 2015, at 8:30 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
so what you want in your OP is just DISCARD in a sieve script and there is no point in
"Using Dovecot LMTP it would be more optimal to kick a 5xx back" when the
desired result is DI
Am 14.01.2015 um 02:23 schrieb Robert Blayzor:
On Jan 13, 2015, at 7:34 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
and what would that change?
nothing if you think about how mail works!
* the MTA receives the message
* the MTA confirms with 2xx status code
* later the delivery server rejects
* the MTA *must
Am 14.01.2015 um 01:28 schrieb Robert Blayzor:
Currently pigeonhole supports reject which would generate a NDR for each
message. (If I understand the current documentation)
Using Dovecot LMTP it would be more optimal to kick a 5xx back to the primary
MTA to reject the delivery rather than gen
Am 12.01.2015 um 13:29 schrieb Jonas Plitt:
*doveadm(exam...@example.com ): Error: Couldn't
initialize SSL context: Can't load CA certs from directory /etc/ssl/certs:
error:02001024:system library:fopen:File name too longdoveadm: Error:
Failed to iterate through some users*"
this is my config
Am 10.01.2015 um 19:34 schrieb David Mehler:
Is anyone running Dovecot on either a Fedora 20 or 21 system?
surely
having an issue, on a system reboot, which I admit does not happen
often, Dovecot fails to start in the systemctl list, output is status
failed. The issue seems to be Dovecot can
Am 05.01.2015 um 21:53 schrieb Yoshito Takeuchi:
I used
FreeBSD 10.1
Dovecot 2.2.15
I want pop3s, so I made
/usr/local/etc/dovecot/local.conf
ssl = yes
ssl_cert = SSLv3 )
I did trouble
/var/log/maillog
Jan 6 05:41:53 example dovecot: pop3-login: Disconnected (no auth attempts in 0
secs)
Am 26.12.2014 um 17:16 schrieb Nick Edwards:
On 12/26/14, Reindl Harald wrote:
sure, you can manage anything if you write enough tools to automate
things, nothing new for me as software developer, but don't you think
there is a reason why advanced package management exists and 95% o
Am 26.12.2014 um 02:20 schrieb Edwardo Garcia:
On 12/26/14, Jeff Mitchell wrote:
On Dec 25, 2014 3:15 PM, "Reindl Harald" wrote:
your Gentoo is nice in a small environment
on larger setups someone is using binary packages and can setup his own
repo with overrides while maintain
Am 25.12.2014 um 21:09 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
Robert Schetterer skrev den 2014-12-25 19:49:
Am 18.12.2014 um 17:56 schrieb Robin Helgelin:
We’re using dovecot 1.0.7
that version is total out of date , update to recent version
centos is a precompiled problem :=)
no it is not
do you realy
Am 16.12.2014 um 21:13 schrieb Ron Cleven:
We tested dovecot for a fair amount of time and decided finally to put
it into production under CentOS 7 (we are running 2.2.10). I just
joined the list, so I apologize for what is probably a question that has
been answered many times, but I was wonder
Am 10.12.2014 um 21:48 schrieb Thomas Klausner:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 09:26:31PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 10.12.2014 um 21:19 schrieb Thomas Klausner:
I have lots of these files:
/home/wiz/Mail/my-folder-name/cur/.imap/1238738125.13533_23713.danbala:2,S/dovecot.index.log
What are
Am 10.12.2014 um 21:19 schrieb Thomas Klausner:
I have lots of these files:
/home/wiz/Mail/my-folder-name/cur/.imap/1238738125.13533_23713.danbala:2,S/dovecot.index.log
What are they for?
Why are they here?
Can I remove them?
RTFM: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/IndexFiles
https://www.google.at/s
Am 06.12.2014 um 14:40 schrieb Daniel Parthey:
Am 6. Dezember 2014 13:10:58 MEZ, schrieb Reindl Harald
:
Am 06.12.2014 um 06:56 schrieb Jan Wideł:
If you add disable_plaintext_auth=yes ssl=required settings, then
dovecot will drop authentication without STARTTLS. But damage will be
done
Am 06.12.2014 um 06:56 schrieb Jan Wideł:
If you add disable_plaintext_auth=yes ssl=required settings, then
dovecot will drop authentication without STARTTLS. But damage will be
done, client will send unencrypted (or in this scenario MD5 or SHA512
hash) login/password
no, damage will *not* be
Am 02.12.2014 um 17:33 schrieb Darren Pilgrim:
On 12/2/2014 1:32 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
ssl_cipher_list = HIGH:!RC4:!MD5:!SRP:!PSK:!aNULL:@STRENGTH
ssl_dh_parameters_length = 2048
ssl_parameters_regenerate = 0
ssl_protocols = !SSLv2 !SSLv3 TLSv1 TLSv1.1 TLSv1.2
But why does ssl_protocols
Am 02.12.2014 um 06:44 schrieb Will Yardley:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 09:27:48PM -0800, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
On 12/1/2014 4:43 PM, Will Yardley wrote:
Can you use both ssl_protocols *and* ssl_cipher_list in the same config
(in a way that's sane)?
Is there a way to exclude these ciphers, whi
Am 01.12.2014 um 21:13 schrieb Marcin Mirosław:
W dniu 2014-12-01 o 18:19, Alessio Cecchi pisze:
Il 01/12/2014 17:24, absolutely_f...@libero.it ha scritto:
Hi,
I'm going to set up a new storage for our email users (about 10k).
It's a network attached storage (Coraid).
In your opinion, what i
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:32 schrieb absolutely_f...@libero.it:
# dovecot -n |grep -i sort
(nothing)
i meant post the complete output
you can't grep for something not existing
but you or some config-include may set something wrong
Maybe to full list is only available after authentication?
like
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:19 schrieb absolutely_f...@libero.it:
why I don't see SORT capability on my dovecot server?
# telnet localhost 143
Trying ::1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE
STARTTLS AUTH=PLAIN
Am 28.11.2014 um 17:45 schrieb Jorge Bastos:
In my previous servers I have clamav+spamassassin configured in postfix, but
things as, scan only outgoing emails it's not possible.
What's the best option for these two filtering now adays?
besides that this is the wrong list
why should it not be
1 - 100 of 718 matches
Mail list logo
