://www.ghettoforge.net/index.php/Moving
Peter
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
e, default_settings = false}
config_path_specified = false
hide_key =
have_dump_filter =
simple_output =
check_full_config =
dump_defaults =
host_verify =
dump_full =
print_banners =
hide_passwords =
fla
Hi Folks,
I'm seeing imapd crash when an evolution user accesses her primary mailbox.
She can see the mailbox perfectly well using thunderbird or Apple
Mail on an iPad; just not from her evolution instance.
Version is 2.4.1-4 (7d8c0e5759)
The error is an assertion failure:
Panic:
ources* with it?
Peter
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
://pigeonhole.dovecot.org/releases/2.4/dovecot-pigeonhole-2.4.1-4.tar.gz
-
https://pigeonhole.dovecot.org/releases/2.4/dovecot-pigeonhole-2.4.1-4.tar.gz.sig
What's the purpose of the -4 in the filename? It's going to cause
issues with packaging
On 16/02/25 16:44, Joan Moreau via dovecot wrote:
It was compiling on main (becoming 2.4), but now, many things have
changed in main, and I am trying to sort out the inflated complexities.
That makes sense. Keep me informed and I'm happy to help in any way I can.
ps://github.com/grosjo/fts-xapian/issues/188
Peter
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
On 11/02/25 21:20, Timo Sirainen via dovecot wrote:
On 7. Feb 2025, at 9.48, Peter via dovecot wrote:
When attempting to build Dovecot 2.4.0 on the aarch64 platform, when running
tests...
test-file-cache.c:268: Assert failed: file_cache_set_size(cache, 1024) == -1
This test attempts to
On 10/02/25 22:41, Zakaria via dovecot wrote:
Aha, it sounds like a real bug then. Maybe you submit to bugs mailing list?
What bugs mailing list? According to
https://www.dovecot.org/bugreport-mail/ bug reports should be sent to
this list, which is exactly what I did.
Peter
inary, I used to have 3 and upgraded to 3.8 and
everything worked just fine.
Bison is 3.7.4 and is the stock Bison for EL9. That said, I am fairly
confident that it's not bison because it builds just fine for the x86_64
arch which uses the exact same version of bison
008f4210] -> #6
__libc_start_main[0x408f42c0] -> #7 _start[0x7f7377977980]
Any ideas on this one?
Peter
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
the
body of these older messages, but i don't see anything useful in the logs..
Please help!
Any suggestions are welcome!
My client is about to crucify me over this..
Thank You All in advance!
Sincerely,
Peter
--
Peter Zieseniss
Principal
htt
On 27/01/25 20:51, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
On 27/01/2025 08:43 EET Peter via dovecot wrote:
On 25/01/25 16:27, Peter via dovecot wrote:
I'm getting the following failed test:
test-var-expand.c:464: Assert failed: labs(t0 - t1) < 10
3600 < 10 is not true
On 25/01/25 16:27, Peter via dovecot wrote:
I'm getting the following failed test:
test-var-expand.c:464: Assert failed: labs(t0 - t1) < 10
3600 < 10 is not true
var_expand(providers) :
FAILED
This test appears to be
he southern hemisphere.
Shouldn't the comparison be done on UTC time instead of localtime to
avoid these issues?
Peter
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
supplied and all discussion about that tool I can find
online is only about moving a users mail across folders on their
account, and not the entire accounts content to another account.
Has anyone tried to do something like this?
--
Peter Reinhold
a runtime config flag to enable or disable it as well?
Peter
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
directly from
the dovecot ce repos once 2.4 is released.
Peter
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
failed: internal_line_match(line,
long_log_prefix, TEXT128)
...this test did not fail in 2.3.21
Peter
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
in a couple
of hours.
Peter
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
mpare it to the stored hash.
Peter
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
n = *.
> I'm curious if it's the same behaviour for machines without IPv4.
Machines without IPv4 enabled are even more of a rarity than ones
without IPv6 nowadays.
Peter
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
That said I don't use the mail crypt plugin so I can't attest to what
happens with that.
Peter
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
directory (the "search" permission). Without the x bit you
will get a permissions error (just like you're getting).
Peter
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
permissive mode and see if it works:
setenforce 0
It might also be apparmour (sorry don't have instructions for apparmour).
The message basically means that something is preventing the dovecot
user from writing to the file, you need to fig
27;re going to run down the postfix list for your
own failure at least have the decency to do it *on* the postfix list.
Peter
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
howto/simple_virtual_install/#simple-virtual-install-smtp-auth
Peter
On 19/04/24 13:27, karl.l--- via dovecot wrote:
Hi,
This is my dovecot version:
```
root@freebsdsvr:~ # dovecot --version
2.3.21 (47349e2482)
```
I'm having trouble in making dovecot as proxy to the mail server when using
ntlm auth
On 17/04/24 00:51, John Stoffel via dovecot wrote:
"Peter" == Peter via dovecot writes:
On 14/04/24 12:09, John Stoffel via dovecot wrote:
I think you need to update both places, so that your username and
password checks are done with lowercase usernames.
Generally speaking you
On 14/04/24 12:09, John Stoffel via dovecot wrote:
I think you need to update both places, so that your username and
password checks are done with lowercase usernames.
Generally speaking you want auth to be case-sensitive, but go ahead and
try it to see if it fixes the issue.
Peter
On 11/04/24 00:07, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
- We do not build or test 2.3 with RHEL9, as it's not supported with 2.3
(yes, I am aware of the broken patch out there)
I assume you're referring to the OpenSSL 3 patch, can you elaborate on
why it's &qu
s the whole data with headers, multipart correctly encoded in
base64, and it can decode it. Probably, stdin data was not correctly
sent to binary from script in case of base64 encoded data. I would like
to understand - why? But the problem is solved now.
Peter
On 09/04/2024 20:47, Doug via do
with the first part of the mail I've posted). Maybe it is salted, but I
don't see how to decode it...
Peter
On 09/04/2024 16:15, Doug via dovecot wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Peter via dovecot
Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2024 5:18 AM
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Strang
ation.
I tried to redirect such mails to another mailbox and process them there, but I
get the same strange data. If I connect Thunderbird to the mailbox - I can read
the mails correctly. So, the problem arrives at the moment when the sieve
system is invoked - the mail data is corrupted somehow.
Any
line under
userdb, add an "L" modifier to username_format, so something like:
args = username_format=%Ln ...
Alternatively you can probably configure your MTA to lowercase the
username before it passes the message off to dovecot.
Peter
___
ppen only for senders to the list with a dmarc polcy
that would prevent emails getting through; now it's for all senders.
Unless you're filtering based on From: you probably won't notice.
Peter C
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
s_client -connect mail.example.com:993
-servername mail.example.com -crlf -quiet
-servername works with newer versions of s_client but is required for
older versions, if you include it in everything you can't go wrong.
Peter
___
dovecot mailing li
looks to be
what I need, it doesn't seem to be configurable down to a specific folder on a
single user.
--
Peter Reinhold
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
erent build stages, what resulting files go in each resulting
package, and what extra commands are run at install and uninstall time, etc.
Peter
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
aught target signal 6 (Aborted) - core dumped
I'll provide more info on request.
Is this just an issue with the tests or is it an issue with Dovecot itself?
Peter
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
LMTP.
Peter
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
Thanks for your reply.
I'm now very confused. Looking at
https://github.com/dovecot/docker/blob/main/2.3.21/Dockerfile this
container clearly just installs the debian package from the community repo.
That's why I thought publishing a arm64 debian package would enable a
arm64 docker image.
I would be fantastic if dovecot could release arm64 debian packages to
the community repo, as it would allow fixing a lot of downstream problems:
- release of official arm64 docker images
- fix other downstream docker images like docker mailserver and mailcow
It looks like arm64 is gaining a lot
The page:
https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/protocols/lmtp_server/
... has links to the old dovecot wiki which are now broken, specifically
the Postfix and Exim links at the bottom of the page.
Can someone please port those pages over to the docs and fix the links?
Peter
Hi,
On 2023-11-28 16:20:56 +0100, gerben.wie...@rna.nl wrote:
From what version on is replication gone? I am running 2.3.20 and it still
there.
it will be gone from version 2.4/3.0 onward (see [0]).
Best regards,
Peter
[0] https://doc.dovecot.org/3.0/installation_guide/upgrading/from-2.3
sers switched
to the same system user, all very busy. Dovecot is a great groupware :)
--
peter
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
Am 25.11.23 um 20:38 schrieb Michael Grant via dovecot:
Error: Mailbox INBOX: Sync failed for mbox: UID inserted in the middle of mailbox
(4315358 > 4312144, seq=1, idx_msgs=3212)
Maildir to the rescue?
https://doc.dovecot.org/admin_manual/known_issues/mbox_problems/
--
pe
this can be done using the settings in
https://github.com/dovecot/core/blob/main/doc/example-config/conf.d/15-mailboxes.conf
Best regards,
Peter
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
know.
Peter
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
/
http://ghettoforge.org/
Peter
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
mailing list and we'll
look into it.
Is there a way to keep old links to archived messages (such as
https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/-/.html)
intact?
Best regards,
Peter
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an
should be resolved soon, allowing
for more complex setups."
Is the mentioned restriction (access to mailbox) still valid in 2023 or
has this constraint been lifted in the meantime?
Best regards,
Peter
[0] https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2017-December/110282.html
On 31/12/22 02:58, Jorge Concha C. wrote:
Hi,
Yes, it works perfectly!
Thanks for confirming. I've moved the packages to gf-plus and future
updates in Ghettoforge will contain this fix.
Peter
ed a bug in Red Hat bugzilla, let's see if anything comes of it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157045
Peter
On 30/12/22 13:17, Peter wrote:
On 30/12/22 07:40, Jorge Concha C. wrote:
Hi...
rpcgen it's required only at compiling time. Not for execution. The
RPM package at
https://mirror.ghettoforge.org/distributions/gf/el/9/testing/x86_64/
requiere rpcgen and this is not necesary.
I wasn&#
seemed to indicate it was required
at runtime as well. Can you verify that it works, though? I'll remove
the runtime requirement.
Peter
On 29/12/22 14:01, Peter wrote:
On 29/12/22 07:30, Jorge Concha C. wrote:
Hi,
Yes, same issue. Package installed: dovecot23-2.3.20-1.gf.el9.x86_64.rpm
And the solution for you simply involvs installing rpcgen during the
configure and build stages? Are there any changes required to
On 29/12/22 07:30, Jorge Concha C. wrote:
Hi,
Yes, same issue. Package installed: dovecot23-2.3.20-1.gf.el9.x86_64.rpm
And the solution for you simply involvs installing rpcgen during the
configure and build stages? Are there any changes required to configure
or build flags?
Peter
adding rpcgen as a build-dep to see if it helps.
Peter
butions/gf/el/9/plus/SRPMS/dovecot23-2.3.20-1.gf.el9.src.rpm
Peter
Hello,
I've tried to find info (apart from looking at the sources) but it
seems this isn't mentioned anywhere.
The setting
plugin {
sieve = file:~/sievedir;active=~/.sievefilter
}
names the directory where the scripts are stored and the symlink
pointing at one.
Right now the sievedir seems t
nted? I've seen issues where dovecot tries to access a
file before the mount has finished, giving a pmerssions denied error.
Peter C
o have --with-sodium and dovecot
will auto-detect sodium at build time by default, but it does need to
have the lib and devel packages installed. I'll push out a build with
sodium for GhettoForge as I see no reason not to have it.
Peter
le of weeks ago.
https://mirror.ghettoforge.org/distributions/gf/el/9/plus/x86_64/
http://ghettoforge.org/index.php/Usage
Peter
ay, though, the storage benefits of mdbox should be
weighed against the sheer simplicity and widespread use of Maildir. If
you have really huge mailboxes (like ones that contain 50,000 or more
messages) then mdbox may be the right solution for you, but most people
will be fine with Maildir.
Peter
;s only so much I can do as one person. The
important stuff is secure, the site will be when I can get time to work
on it.
Peter
The main site doesn't currently support https but the repositories do,
also all packages are cryptographically signed and the signing keys are
served off of a secure server.
The info on the site is public information that doesn't really need to
be secure.
Peter
On 6/08/22 04:1
me know if you have any difficulties or questions with these
packages.
Peter Ajamian
On 28/07/22 6:55 am, dove...@ptld.com wrote:
Any plans or timeline for when there will be a latest repo for RHEL9?
I should have Ghettoforge packages out hopefully early next month.
Peter
mail?
Look at doveadm-search(1) and doveadm-search-query(7) for this.
You can loop through the list of mailboxes from doveadm mailbox list and
pass them one at a time to `doveadm search NEW MAILBOX mailboxname` to
see if any messages are returned from the search.
Peter
> "Aki" == Aki Tuomi writes:
Aki> This is working exactly as documented. Mbox is the *source* and
Aki> maildir is the *destination*, since you are using 'backup' not
Aki> 'sync' command.
Ah. So sync is bidirectional, backup single directional.
>>
>> Even this didn't work properly for me.
hose who want a patched release for the
EL platform.
Peter
On 8/07/22 4:49 am, Istiak Ferdous wrote:
Hello,
Redhat 9 is publicly released for some time. Is there any plan to
provide repository for it?
GhettoForge will be releasing for EL9 once Rocky Linux 9 drops. In the
meantime there is dovecot 2.3.16 in appstream.
Peter
On 12/05/22 3:38 am, Alan Swanson wrote:
On Tue, 2022-05-10 at 09:33 +0300, Aki Tuomi wrote:
Hi all!
We are pleased to release v2.3.19 of Dovecot.
On Sun, 2022-02-06 at 14:25 +, Alan Swanson wrote:
On Sat, 2022-02-05 at 14:55 +1300, Peter wrote:
On 8/12/21 2:12 am, Alan Swanson wrote
#x27;s all good but you'd
best do it with all your entry points, not just POP3, and there's no
practical reason to actually prevent a user from using POP3 if that's
what they want (it limits features they have access to, nothing more).
Peter
On 2/03/22 1:23 pm, Sebastian Nie
The only modern reason I can think of to continue to support POP3 is
that gmail's email fetch feature only works over POP3, so if you want
people to be able to import their email from your server to gmail or
google workspace then you should probably continue to support POP3.
Peter
On
On 7/02/22 7:21 am, Peter wrote:
On 7/02/22 3:25 am, Alan Swanson wrote:
Is this fixed yet in 2.3.18?
No, still broken and core dumping (there's been no changes to
src/plugins/fts/fts-storage.c) and the commit still needs reverted on
2.3.18.
Thanks, I'll keep that patch in place i
On 7/02/22 3:25 am, Alan Swanson wrote:
Is this fixed yet in 2.3.18?
No, still broken and core dumping (there's been no changes to
src/plugins/fts/fts-storage.c) and the commit still needs reverted on
2.3.18.
Thanks, I'll keep that patch in place in my build for now, then.
Peter
mails locally, using getmail to receive
mails from my provider and managing these using Thunderbird
(IMAP-Server: local Dovecot, SMTP-Server: remote).
Kind regards,
Peter
Am 05.02.22 um 21:22 schrieb Aki Tuomi:
On 05/02/2022 12:08 Peter Nabbefeld wrote:
Hello,
as I need a mailbox locally onl
l).
3. Restarted Dovecot and Email-Client (Thunderbird).
However, I cannot subscribe to the new folder. What am I missing here?
Kind regards,
Peter
re dump in lib20_fts_plugin.so
for me.
https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/9d02ac2e4232cc69bc37344c6341674b87078301
Is this fixed yet in 2.3.18?
Peter
o you either accept
that a number of messages will, depending on circumstances, not make it
to the recipient, or you take drastic measures to resign everything so
that the recipient MTA is happy.
Peter
t the forwarded
message will pass SPF, DKIM and DMARC checks and therefore have the best
chances of being received by the recipient. Anything else relies on
implementation specifics of the sender and/or the recipient MTAs which
may or may not make that possible.
Peter
d as
such the DKIM signature passes. As long as teh message is originally
DKIM signed by the same domain as that in the From: header then it will
pass DMARC regardless of SPF. This, of course, is heavily dependent on
the proper usage of DKIM by the original sender.
Peter
.com/hungerburg/00d582bf1a6bf3c622797bf5e759f75b
--
peter
e 0.4.24 (124e06aa)
X-Sieve-Redirected-From: peter
Delivered-To: peter
Received: from dovecot
by newton.cx with LMTP id xxx
for ; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 04:32:50 +
From pe...@newton.cx Thu Jul 01 04:32:50 2021
Received: from xxx
by newton.cx with esmtpsa xxx
verbose_ssl" doesn't really say anything about the process of find
a CA cert to check with.
Have I misunderstood the config?
/Peter
wrote:
I delete duplicates before they are delivered to a mailbox.
From using doveadm-deduplicate, I remember that with message-Id as
criterion, it would delete too much for my taste, of what makes a duplicate.
--
peter
currently opened. This propertry is pure client
side state by definition.
Peter
On Dec 19, 2020, at 12:19 AM, Philip Rhoades <mailto:p...@pricom.com.au>> wrote:
David,
On 2020-12-19 00:08, David Morsberger wrote:
Phil,
Are you trying to find out how dovecot marks emails as u
/quota/quota-status.c#L109-L111
<https://github.com/dovecot/core/blob/master/src/plugins/quota/quota-status.c#L109-L111>.
I suspect it’s not possible to use the quota-status service to control outbound
email but thought I’d ask to confirm. I’m wondering if there’s a different way
to achieve this?
Thanks
Peter
On 12/4/20 4:29 AM, David Pottage wrote:
On 2020-12-03 21:41, Peter Cooper Jr. wrote:
Hey, I really appreciate Dovecot being available with standard repos
in repo.dovecot.org. I'm currently using the "CentOS 7" one on Amazon
Linux 2 and it works great for x86_64.
I'm wo
if they're available somewhere else already?
I may play around with compiling things myself, but just downloading an
official package is generally the easier way to go so I thought it
couldn't hurt to ask.
Thanks,
Peter
t now.
--
peter
2) Install fetchmail, make it pull the ISPs IMAP and deliver locally
3) Install postfix as a smart relay and deliver locally to locals
Feel free to fill in the details ;)
--
peter
At 26 October, 2020 Sebastian Nielsen wrote:
>
> >> why not just point them at a hosting service like google apps, and let
> google keep things up to date?
Oh they most certainly do :)
> Costs money, and also the problem is that gmail imposes heavy spam filters
> and "reputation blocks" meaning
At 25 October, 2020 R. Diez wrote:
>
> I am too afraid, I would not expose any such port on the Internet. Who knows
> if the mail server stays months without an update. If I am to recommend or
> implement any such mail server solution to a small business, I would insist
> that the e-mail server is
se information snippets together.
Sorry, the world is too big :)
--
peter
have to somehow keep tabs on remote and local usernames.
Passwords will be different. Local updates should be no problem with a
reasonable distro, e.g. the dovecot public repo.
Happy becoming a mail server admin!
Peter
Am 25.10.20 um 18:56 schrieb R. Diez:
Hi all:
I am evaluating mail server
Am 19.10.20 um 18:50 schrieb PGNet Dev:
On 10/19/20 9:38 AM, Peter wrote:
A network trace will show you, it TB actually requests something for
your header search. Might be quicker
that was my earlier quick-check ...
abs nada from > tcpdump -i lo port 8984
on the server, when doing
Am 19.10.20 um 18:17 schrieb PGNet Dev:
On 10/19/20 9:15 AM, Peter wrote:
If I remember correctly, that is an issue with TB - it only does body
serches serverside, regardless of what you request, there should be an
entry in their bugzilla, I'm too lazy right now.
this is a very old bu
ng any additional activity in solr.log
If I remember correctly, that is an issue with TB - it only does body
serches serverside, regardless of what you request, there should be an
entry in their bugzilla, I'm too lazy right now.
--
peter
1 - 100 of 626 matches
Mail list logo
