RE: sieve script is not exescuted

2025-07-28 Thread Marc via dovecot
check logs, maybe memory use is killing the executables and save locations > > > I have scripts in 2 places: > sieve_script personal { > path = ~/.dovecot.sieve > } > > > sieve_script before { > path = /etc/dovecot/sieve > } > > > /etc/dovecot/sieve is directory with (current

discarded vacation reply to own address (as specified using :addresses argument)

2025-07-22 Thread Marc via dovecot
Did I configure this? Or is this default behaviour of dovecot? How can I turn this off if this is a standard config? ___ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org

RE: how to fix this

2025-07-01 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > > I thought this was more related to some sort of corruption on the > > file system. Also the doveadm does not seem to be able to fix it. I > > never created this 'foldertest17485243507278' so I guessed it is > > maybe something dovecot found. Some stray mailbox it > > detected. Nobody every s

RE: how to fix this

2025-06-28 Thread Marc via dovecot
dovecot-2.3.16-15.el9.x86_64 > I thought this was more related to some sort of corruption on the file > system. Also the doveadm does not seem to be able to fix it. I never > created this 'foldertest17485243507278' so I guessed it is maybe > something dovecot found. Some stray mailbox it detected.

RE: how to fix this

2025-06-28 Thread Marc via dovecot
I thought this was more related to some sort of corruption on the file system. Also the doveadm does not seem to be able to fix it. I never created this 'foldertest17485243507278' so I guessed it is maybe something dovecot found. Some stray mailbox it detected. Nobody every seen these automatica

how to fix this

2025-06-27 Thread Marc via dovecot
doveadm force-resync -u $account INBOX doveadm(): Warning: fscking index file /.../index/storage/dovecot.map.index doveadm(): Warning: mdbox /.../mdbox/storage: rebuilding indexes doveadm(): Error: Couldn't open mailbox 'foldertest1751045732429': Mailbox doesn't exist: foldertest1751045732429

RE: dragging files into mail folders

2025-05-29 Thread Marc via dovecot
https://addons.thunderbird.net/en-GB/thunderbird/addon/lookout-fix-version/ > > If I drag files in imap folders in outlook they will show up in eg > roundcube/thunderbird as winmail.dat. So I guess this is just a > microsoft thing. Would be nice if there were plugins that would add > functionalit

RE: dragging files into mail folders

2025-05-29 Thread Marc via dovecot
If I drag files in imap folders in outlook they will show up in eg roundcube/thunderbird as winmail.dat. So I guess this is just a microsoft thing. Would be nice if there were plugins that would add functionality that unwrapped these winmail.dat files. > > > If i Understood correctly you ar

dragging files into mail folders

2025-05-28 Thread Marc via dovecot
With exchange and outlook I was always used to sometimes drag files into mail folders. Is something like this available for imap? Or maybe a dovecot extension? (obviously I am not looking for a solution to store them as attachments to mails) ___ dovec

RE: autoexpunge

2025-02-18 Thread Marc via dovecot
run cron job with purge? > > I have the following in 15-mailboxes.config: > > mailbox Trash { > special_use = \Trash > autoexpunge = 30 days > } > > I thought that would empty the deleted emails after 30 days. However, I > find that in .Deleted Messages/cur there are over 18K messag

RE: IMAP dovecot\postgres low authentication performance

2025-02-13 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > it's definitely not postgres (and "one core" problem for postgres > related > with one heavy connect or data modifying, not for "select from") > > I see only one process that uses CPU100% with a high amount of logins > and > it's auth. And I see only one 100% loaded core on the server. > >

RE: IMAP dovecot\postgres low authentication performance

2025-02-13 Thread Marc via dovecot
How did you do the test? > > I set up a test server and started testing it by multiple threads (1- > 200), > using all the advice given to me. > 1 I disabled the postlogin script > 2 raised maxconns to 200 > 3 set service_count = 400, process_min_avail = 100 > 4 increase auth_cache > 5 increase

mailinglist (mailman) + dovecot

2025-02-12 Thread Marc via dovecot
I was think of adding a mailinglist for a few users. First I thought about maybe using separate container for this, but maybe I can just also add this to the server running dovecot. Anyone having experience with running mailman or something else next to dovecot? __

RE: Dovecot's default password storage scheme is not GDPR compliant

2025-02-12 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > > Therefore, Dovecot's plain text default, and the md5 option, are both > non-GDPR compliant. > > > > To avoid monetary sanctions, Dovecot ought to change how it stores > passwords by default. > > > > Please do not ignore this message. > > GDPR is some piece of bull*it regulation made by th

RE: Dovecot's default password storage scheme is not GDPR compliant

2025-02-10 Thread Marc via dovecot
Your argument is "that a default install is not compliant" and therefore you ask people to change things. I am proving your argument is incorrect, so the basis of your change request is gone. > > A default dovecot (el9 rpm) install is compliant as it does not work > and does not do anything, i

RE: Dovecot's default password storage scheme is not GDPR compliant

2025-02-10 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > This is not the point, however. > > The point is that the default is not GDPR compliant, and a first easy > alternative is also not GDPR compliant, and decoupling the user scheme > from the server storage scheme is not at all obvious. Adopting a GDPR- > compliant default would send out the in

RE: Dovecot's default password storage scheme is not GDPR compliant

2025-02-10 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > Dovecot aligns the password encryption scheme used by the imap client > with the password storage scheme used by the server. > > Since the default is set to plain text, the client sends the password in > plain text (tls tunneled), and the server local storage of passwords is > a plain text fi

RE: IMAP dovecot\postgres low authentication performance

2025-02-03 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > > Probably not as you only restarted. The limit is when you have create a > new > > connection and don't use an existing one. > > I don't see a way to reuse an existing connection yet if the number of > persistent connections after a restart should increase from 0 to 40K > I miss something o

RE: IMAP dovecot\postgres low authentication performance

2025-02-03 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > Do you mean that the contents of this file are not cached? or that there > is > some limit on the number of simultaneous requests to read it? > content of this file not look too heavy > > > psql -c "UPDATE core_user SET last_login=now() WHERE username='$USER'" > > > > /dev/null I would put a

RE: [OFFLIST] Re: IMAP dovecot\postgres low authentication performance

2025-02-03 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > > > Long ago in MagicMail we recognized that there was a problem with > > Postgres direct back addressing a large number of AUTH attempts at > once, > > and we went down the road to using a high performace DBFILE > mechanisms, > > with real time updates from the Postgres database.. allowed us t

RE: IMAP dovecot\postgres low authentication performance

2025-02-03 Thread Marc via dovecot
> No, we don't have the noticeable iowait problem as I see it(at least > until > the number of connections lower 20-30K). The problem appears when > thousands > of clients try to reconnect at the same time and according to the > documentation the auth service should make a simple request to postgre

RE: IMAP dovecot\postgres low authentication performance

2025-02-03 Thread Marc via dovecot
> Current performance is about 3000 successful authentications per hour. > No I don't really get this authentication attempts is limitted by tcp not? So it does not really matter what you have mariadb, ldap, http, you awalys are limited to 150-200 r/s. Once you have a connection, you can go easi

RE: [Off-topic] ANN: Nauthilus

2025-01-31 Thread Marc via dovecot
> # Project > > https://github.com/croessner/nauthilus > > # Sub projects > > https://github.com/croessner/nauthilus-demo > https://github.com/croessner/nauthilus-keycloak > https://github.com/croessner/pfxhttp > https://github.com/croessner/geoip-policyd > First when I read this, how is this

RE: Replication ade

2025-01-26 Thread Marc via dovecot
Kein Problem! ;) > > > > Meine Frage in die Runde: Wie wollt Ihr die Replikation ersetzen? > > Irgendwas mit NFS oder gibt es da eine empfohlene Herangehensweise? > > ceph ? ___ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an emai

RE: Dovecot 2.4.0 compilation issues (Linux, GCC 8.3.1)

2025-01-25 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > > > Currently, Dovecot 2.3.21.1 compiles and runs fine on a Red Hat Linux > > clone with GCC 8.3.1. Now tried the brandnew sources of Dovecot 2.4.0, > > but to my surprise it doesn't even compile and I have no clue where > > to begin my debugging. > Building from this src rpm does not work

RE: Dovecot 2.4.0 compilation issues (Linux, GCC 8.3.1)

2025-01-25 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > Currently, Dovecot 2.3.21.1 compiles and runs fine on a Red Hat Linux > clone with GCC 8.3.1. Now tried the brandnew sources of Dovecot 2.4.0, > but to my surprise it doesn't even compile and I have no clue where > to begin my debugging. Building from this src rpm does not work https://repo.d

RE: TLS Connections Between Dovecot & MariaDB

2025-01-25 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > It is - that's just "belt and braces" stuff (also known as "defence in > depth" :-) ) It is good to limit to just your own ca. I do this with the ldap. Was just not expecting it from someone having users stored in mariadb and having virtual users and then worrying about CA's credibility. If

RE: TLS Connections Between Dovecot & MariaDB

2025-01-25 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > I'm using a MariaDB backend to a Dovecot server, with TLS required by > the MariaDB server for connections. > > My sql_dovecot.conf.ext file is using the following connection line: > `connect = host=mariadb.example.com dbname=mail_server user=vmail > password={REDACTED} ssl_ca=/etc/pki/tls/ce

RE: Fwd: [OFFLIST] Re: connection refused, no error anywhere

2025-01-23 Thread Marc via dovecot
ypt files as needed while copying > them to the directories for the dovecot certificates. > > > Am 23. Januar 2025 um 09:34 schrieb "Marc via dovecot" > mailto:dovecot@dovecot.org?to=%22Marc%20via%20dovecot%22%20%3Cdovecot%40 > dovecot.org%3E >: > > &g

RE: Fwd: Fwd: [OFFLIST] Re: connection refused, no error anywhere

2025-01-23 Thread Marc via dovecot
as root, you get blocked. > -Original Message- > From: Benny Pedersen via dovecot > Sent: Thursday, 23 January 2025 09:27 > To: dovecot@dovecot.org > Subject: Re: Fwd: Fwd: [OFFLIST] Re: connection refused, no error > anywhere > > Marc via dovecot sk

RE: Fwd: Fwd: [OFFLIST] Re: connection refused, no error anywhere

2025-01-23 Thread Marc via dovecot
hey run as root, you get blocked. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Benny Pedersen via dovecot > > Sent: Thursday, 23 January 2025 09:27 > > To: dovecot@dovecot.org > > Subject: Re: Fwd: Fwd: [OFFLIST] Re: connection refused, no error > > anywhere &

RE: Fwd: Fwd: [OFFLIST] Re: connection refused, no error anywhere

2025-01-23 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > dovecot starts as root, and drops priveleges later, so group it non > rooted is a security problem on its own :) > > certbot creates letencrypt pem files owned by root and grouped root, > only the private key cant be readed by other users then root > wtf letsencrypt still requires root?? Wh

RE: Fwd: Fwd: [OFFLIST] Re: connection refused, no error anywhere

2025-01-22 Thread Marc via dovecot
> guess this is because the same certificates were used by the website, > which > I also have to rebuild next week. So I will have to add dovecot and the > httpd user to that group, I think. No? > No the other way around. Add dovecot to the acme group, the certs are the least important.

RE: connection refused, no error anywhere

2025-01-21 Thread Marc via dovecot
You are sure dovecot is running on the ports (netstat -tanp). You are sure this firewall is ok? Maybe flush it, just to be sure. > Greetings, > > I was just tasked with rebuilding from scratch the mail server of an > NGO, > on a brand new Ubuntu 24.04 LTS VPS. > > I have copied the whole doveco

RE: find mailbox (path) of message

2025-01-13 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > > >> How should I use 'doveadm search -u' to get the mailbox path where > the > >> message is stored? > > https://doc.dovecot.org/main/core/man/doveadm-search.1.html states: > > > >doveadm-search(1) - Show a list of mailbox GUIDs and message UIDs > >matching given search query. > > > >

RE: Problem email client iPhone ios18.2

2025-01-05 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > Well, I uncommented the imap_capabilities flag and REMOVED the IDLE > capability and now iOS 18 Mail client is getting and syncing emails. I > suspect the folks over at Stalwart were on to something I just > don't know why command pipelining had to be added by Apple for the > important ID

find mailbox (path) of message

2024-12-20 Thread Marc via dovecot
How should I use 'doveadm search -u' to get the mailbox path where the message is stored? ___ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org

RE: failed: error:14094416:SSL routines:ssl3_read_bytes:sslv3 alert certificate unknown: SSL alert number 46, session=

2024-12-19 Thread Marc via dovecot
> >>> > >> What is the best way to get rid of this message? I think clients > start > > generating after ssl crt update. > > > > This usually means you forgot to use fullchain cert. This is > coming > from > > clients telling you they don't like your certificate. > >>>

RE: failed: error:14094416:SSL routines:ssl3_read_bytes:sslv3 alert certificate unknown: SSL alert number 46, session=

2024-12-19 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What is the best way to get rid of this message? I think clients > > > start > > > > generating after ssl crt update. > > > > > > > > This usually means you forgot to use fullchain cert. This is coming > > > from > > > > clients telling you they don't like your cer

RE: failed: error:14094416:SSL routines:ssl3_read_bytes:sslv3 alert certificate unknown: SSL alert number 46, session=

2024-12-19 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > > > > > > What is the best way to get rid of this message? I think clients > start > > generating after ssl crt update. > > > > This usually means you forgot to use fullchain cert. This is coming > from > > clients telling you they don't like your certificate. > > > > openssl s_client -conn

RE: failed: error:14094416:SSL routines:ssl3_read_bytes:sslv3 alert certificate unknown: SSL alert number 46, session=

2024-12-19 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > > > What is the best way to get rid of this message? I think clients start > generating after ssl crt update. > > This usually means you forgot to use fullchain cert. This is coming from > clients telling you they don't like your certificate. > openssl s_client -connect x:143 -startt

failed: error:14094416:SSL routines:ssl3_read_bytes:sslv3 alert certificate unknown: SSL alert number 46, session=

2024-12-19 Thread Marc via dovecot
What is the best way to get rid of this message? I think clients start generating after ssl crt update. ___ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org

RE: Problem email client iPhone ios18.2

2024-12-19 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > So yes, it must be a client issue, but it only seems to appear on > dovecot imap servers. > I've tested this on my private setup at home with Dovecot 2.3.19.1 from > Debian 12 repository as well as at the company where we use Dovecot-ee > 2.3.21-8 from the Open-xchange repository where the sam

RE: Problem email client iPhone ios18.2

2024-12-18 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > This is clearly a problem with the mail client on iPhone. However, is > there anything I can adjust in my server settings to mitigate this issue > for users? > Make sure to complain a lot at apple. I already harassed the market abuse team at the EU. _

RE: Error: Couldn't open INBOX: Permission denied

2024-12-14 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > My desire is to get system generated mail (currently delivered to the > file /var/spool/mail/root) to be picked up from another machine by user > peter So that means you should deliver/redirect this email to peter (or you need to start messing with shared/public mailboxes) > > Is there any

RE: Info on 'sieve_pipe_bin_dir' needed

2024-12-06 Thread Marc via dovecot
> I'm trying to follow the instruction > https://doc.dovecot.org/2.3/configuration_manual/howto/antispam_with_sie > ve/ to setup IMAPSieve > > I cannot find any info on what sieve_pipe_bin_dir should point to. Any > references I have found to this point to the old wiki. > > My current spam learni

RE: Migrating GMail to Dovecot using imapc

2024-11-30 Thread Marc via dovecot
I can remember looking at rspamd years ago. To me it looks like a choas of applied rules. I can remember asking these devs some questions about rule processing order, and they could not even answer them. Do they still make own graphs? That already tells you their whole approach is old-fashione

RE: Migrating GMail to Dovecot using imapc

2024-11-29 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > >> I more or less said that, you are a mail administrator yes? then > you know bloody damn well that 99% of spam checks are carried out > after reception of the mail​ > > depends what you define by reception. We perform spam checks on the > DATA portion of the mail reception and can refuse a

RE: Migrating GMail to Dovecot using imapc

2024-11-29 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > Incorrect Sent means the receiving server has correctly received the > > transmitted message. It has nothing to do with spam or not spam. > > > > > I more or less said that, you are a mail administrator yes? then you > know > bloody damn well that 99% of spam checks are carried out after recept

RE: Migrating GMail to Dovecot using imapc

2024-11-27 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > > > > > > > > Try sending a spam message that Gmail sends you, back to them and > see > > > what happens. > > > > > > > It is even worse, they just accept emails with stat=Sent and then > delete > > emails without notifications. I am currently trying to get the EU to > take > > such behaviour

RE: Migrating GMail to Dovecot using imapc

2024-11-26 Thread Marc via dovecot
> In all fairness here, Gmail/Outlook play by their own rules and people > just accept them because it's free. > > Try sending a spam message that Gmail sends you, back to them and see > what happens. > It is even worse, they just accept emails with stat=Sent and then delete emails without noti

RE: Migrating GMail to Dovecot using imapc

2024-11-26 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > > > > > > Your system reporting false positives, that is what I am trying to > tell > > you! > > > > > Maybe that is in your opinion because you can not send him direct mail? > Why No, it is not an opinion it is a fact. That is the huge difference here. There is some sort of logic in my reaso

RE: Migrating GMail to Dovecot using imapc

2024-11-25 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > > But now you are like ms/google/letsencrypt. We decide how you should > > setup your servers, we decide how you setup your dns, we decide you > are > > not allowed to block the amazon cloud etc. > > WTF drugs are you on, my organisation my rules. > What education did you acquire? With your

RE: Migrating GMail to Dovecot using imapc

2024-11-24 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > > > Your provider is using this to estimate if a party is spam and block > > your email. I prefer a system where you actually block someone for > > having send spam. Since I am not sending newsletters or so and this > > infrastructure I use is low volume, nothing outgoing is detected as > > spa

RE: Migrating GMail to Dovecot using imapc

2024-11-23 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > > ps. I think these guys have had their best times > https://zonecheck.org/ > > not really up to date info > > ? > Your provider is using this to estimate if a party is spam and block your email. I prefer a system where you actually block someone for having send spam. Since I am not sendi

RE: Migrating GMail to Dovecot using imapc

2024-11-22 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > > >> Sorry for being off topic, but why are you deciding to move to > >> dovecot? I have the impression the trend is that everyone is moving > to > >> google/outlook? > > > > In June 2023, we ran a poll, below is results of primary use of email, > > the requirement was imap/pop3 be an ISP or pr

RE: Migrating GMail to Dovecot using imapc

2024-11-22 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > > Microsft outlook and Google Gmail hosts most spammers on the Planet > > Earth. > > Nah, the worst offenders are OVH and Contabo, followed by digital sewer, > then gmail :) > If you make spf -all for gmail that helps a lot. However there are still quite a few 'my family member is so good

RE: Migrating GMail to Dovecot using imapc

2024-11-18 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > Not everyone. The EU is pushing hard for data to stay local. MS/Google > will do what they know best: offer 0 support even to paying customers > and jack up the prices once the competition dries up. > You have already MS / Google data centres in the EU. And Apple is using European registere

RE: Migrating GMail to Dovecot using imapc

2024-11-18 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > Nick Howitt via dovecot skrev den 2024-11-18 13:00: > > For me, I don't want big tech monitoring my emails. > > security starts with smime imho Yes true, and it is more likely such things will be offered first by the bigger cloud providers ___ d

RE: Migrating GMail to Dovecot using imapc

2024-11-18 Thread Marc via dovecot
nment that is quite appealing to users. > > For me, I don't want big tech monitoring my emails. > > > On 18/11/2024 11:52, Marc via dovecot wrote: > > Sorry for being off topic, but why are you deciding to move to > dovecot? I have the impression the trend is that

RE: Migrating GMail to Dovecot using imapc

2024-11-18 Thread Marc via dovecot
Sorry for being off topic, but why are you deciding to move to dovecot? I have the impression the trend is that everyone is moving to google/outlook? > > I try to migrate a GMail mailbox to Dovecot using `doveadm backup -R > imapc:`. Since it seems that GMail disabled the login without XOAUTH2,

sharing sso between regular mail client and web applications

2024-11-18 Thread Marc via dovecot
I am testing a bit with sso with keycloak, I was wondering if/how it is possible that your logged in session between eg Thunderbird and dovecot can be used as a single sign on in webapplications. So as long as you have an active session with dovecot you can access all your web applications witho

RE: openid / roundcube example

2024-11-14 Thread Marc via dovecot
I worked around this bug, having to append the url otocol/openid-connect/token/?token=eyJhbGciOiJSUzI1NiIsInR5c But having this Got 405 response for request [Req1: GET https:/ Method Not Allowed (took 16 ms + 41 ms in queue) Change to POST? > I am getting first > > Using 1 idle connections to

RE: openid / roundcube example

2024-11-14 Thread Marc via dovecot
I am getting first Using 1 idle connections to handle 1 requests (1 total connections ready) Claimed request [Req2: GET https: No more requests to service for this peer (1 connections exist, 0 pending) and then the 404 Got 404 response for request [Req2: GET https:/ This should work with 2.3.16

RE: openid / roundcube example

2024-11-14 Thread Marc via dovecot
> Does anyone have a current config example using openid and with > roundcube. I like to add this next to 'regular' logins'. I was able to > login once but know I am getting these in the logs > > " No requests to service for this peer (1 connections exist, 0 pending)" > > > I have added the 2 pa

openid / roundcube example

2024-11-14 Thread Marc via dovecot
Does anyone have a current config example using openid and with roundcube. I like to add this next to 'regular' logins'. I was able to login once but know I am getting these in the logs " No requests to service for this peer (1 connections exist, 0 pending)" I have added the 2 passdb with link

RE: replication and backup

2024-11-11 Thread Marc via dovecot
> First of all, I'm not a dovecot user yet. > For several years now I use cyrus imapd and never saw the urge to > switch, until I recently lost random mails from my mailbox which were > neither temporally connected nor related in some other way. > What do you mean lost? And how do you know it is

RE: replication and backup

2024-11-11 Thread Marc via dovecot
> - NOT expunging the emails that have been marked as deleted on the slave > server or expunging only manually Yes I think it is depending on your storage format (mdbox only?). I am running "doveadm purge -u" every two months. If I would make a new server I would also use the LAYOUT=index this

RE: Inboxes incorrectly become /var/mail/%u

2024-10-29 Thread Marc via dovecot
> I am new to dovecot and have just done my first install, but, looking at > your output, you are using Local Delivery rather than LMTP? If so, isn't > the local delivery MTA (postfix, exim or whatever) responsible for > dropping the mail into the correct location? postfix does not know some mail

RE: LMTP rejecting aliased emails

2024-10-26 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > Mail already in the queue will need to be reprocessed with > postsuper -r ALL > > Or just delete it and test again. > his problem is low uid number ___ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovec

RE: LMTP rejecting aliased emails

2024-10-26 Thread Marc via dovecot
> I am pretty new to Dovecot and totally new to LMTP. I have normal > delivery working but I am struggling with aliases. In my mail queue I am > seeing things like: > > But in my /etc/aliases, I am aliasing clamav to nick and > n...@mydomain.com is a valid mail box that can receive normal mail.

disable sieve header

2024-10-22 Thread Marc via dovecot
Is it possible to disable emitting the sieve header? X-Sieve: Pigeonhole Sieve ___ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org

RE: shared mailbox error

2024-10-14 Thread Marc via dovecot
I don't have an ALT specified in the mail location of the shared namespace. Also when I add there ALT= I keep getting these checks. Also creating empty file there creates this error. Error: t_readlink(//mdbox/dbox-alt-root) failed: readlink() I don't really like the idea of creating a s

shared mailbox error

2024-10-14 Thread Marc via dovecot
I am getting this error. This file does not exist. Error: t_readlink(/xx/dbox-alt-root) failed: readlink() failed: Permission denied ___ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org

LAYOUT=index requires mailbox_list _index=yes

2024-10-06 Thread Marc via dovecot
I am adding a namespace with LAYOUT=index to an existing configuration, and get this notification: LAYOUT=index requires mailbox_list_index=yes Maybe better to just not risk it and add LAYOUT=fs to my existing mail_location=mdbox: lines? ___ dovec

RE: Namespace for seperate Storage of Archive

2024-10-01 Thread Marc via dovecot
Hi Christian, nice you got this. I could have given you this also, but I have this weird tree in the mail client, so I thought better not share it. I prefer to see only 1 'Archive' > > I found the Solution myself. The key was to simply create an unnamed > mailbox directive so that the namesp

RE: Dovecot undeleteable folder?

2024-09-27 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > > I think a good work around would be using LAYOUT=INDEX then you get > > folder names like this and you 'probably' do not have such conflicts. > > I think this layout is also better for when people start using > > 'weird' characters or long names. Bad thing is, you need to convert > > everyth

RE: Dovecot undeleteable folder?

2024-09-27 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > Example: Customer has a Folder named: ARCHIV.AdministrationXXX > > Folder file exists and permissions look right: > ./ARCHIV/AdministrationXXX > > d delete ARCHIV.AdministrationXXX > d OK Delete completed (0.001 + 0.000 secs). > > Folder file is still present and can not be deleted again. >

RE: (无主题)

2024-09-26 Thread Marc via dovecot
How is it possible that you have problems compiling a srpm? You must have changed something. What is even this el6? ;) If you want run dovecot on older el6 maybe try via docker? > I encountered the following issue while compiling Dovecot on a Linux > system with the Shenwei architecture in Chin

RE: trigger/event on mailbox create / acl create possible?

2024-09-24 Thread Marc via dovecot
I have made some temporary fix with a cron job that checks this every 5 min and auto subscribes mailboxes when a user is added to the acl. But I am still looking for something better. > > > I was wondering if it is possible to execute some trigger after a mailbox > is being shared so the u

RE: 0000002e: 5: filter action: program indicated false result

2024-09-24 Thread Marc via dovecot
It was related to some memory allocation in go. When I increased the memory in lmtp. This problem was solved. Others started to notice this after some specific version update of go. > > > Op 19-9-2024 om 22:46 schreef Marc via dovecot: > > I am trying to modify the body of

RE: Outllok on iPhone not copying sent mesages to a Sent Items folder

2024-09-24 Thread Marc via dovecot
I don't think you can use outlook mobile clients any more with own solutions. I was trying this a few years ago and noticed all kinds of weird things not working. I think it even sends your user+password to the microsoft cloud and the ms cloud is handling your mail on the background. Can't reall

trigger/event on mailbox create / acl create possible?

2024-09-23 Thread Marc via dovecot
I was wondering if it is possible to execute some trigger after a mailbox is being shared so the user is automatically subscribed to it? ___ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org

bug / acl support in accessing index?

2024-09-23 Thread Marc via dovecot
also bug/no acl support in accessing index dovecot[28746]: imap(usertest6)<29630>: Error: fchown(/shared/usertest/index/mailboxes.lockcfcdcd07648b68e0, group=10001(usertest)) failed: Operation not permitted (egid=10006, group based on /shared/usertest/mdbox - see http://wiki2.dovecot.or

bug dir copy group permissions?

2024-09-23 Thread Marc via dovecot
I am not sure if this page is correct, looks at least like this g+s not ok https://doc.dovecot.org/2.3/admin_manual/filesystem_permission/ work-around is to manually create dirs mdbox mdbox/storage mdbox/mailboxes. I would think this is a bug as files seem to be created correctly. group rights a

why am getting these foldertest17270834637853 / foldertest

2024-09-23 Thread Marc via dovecot
I am testing with sharing folders and constantly changing namespaces configs. But quite regulary I am seeing these mailboxes popup foldertest17270834637853 with sub mailbox foldertest ___ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send a

RE: problems with testing shared mailbox availability

2024-09-23 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > > On 23-09-2024 10:30, Marc via dovecot wrote: > > this seems to show > > doveadm mailbox list -u usertest6 > > > > Trash > > Sent > > NotSpam > > Drafts > > Junk > > Shared > > UserShares > > UserShares/usert

problems with testing shared mailbox availability

2024-09-23 Thread Marc via dovecot
this seems to show doveadm mailbox list -u usertest6 Trash Sent NotSpam Drafts Junk Shared UserShares UserShares/usertest UserShares/usertest/sharedtest3 UserShares/usertest/sharedtest1 UserShares/usertest/sharedtest2 INBOX But thunderbird / roundcube show nothing. Any idea's why? _

RE: Mail Backup from IMAP to POP3

2024-09-22 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > It doesn't look as if IMAP is supported ? > ___ Maybe try again later after a good night rest? ___ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org

RE: shared mailbox not visible, acl_shared_dict stays empty

2024-09-22 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > I am creating the mailbox like this: > > doveadm -o mail_gid=testgroup2 mailbox create -u usertest > shared/sharedtest1 > > I can set acl's (I think), at least the acl get produces the same. > > doveadm acl set -u usertest shared/sharedtest1 user=usertest6 lookup read > write write-seen ins

shared mailbox not visible, acl_shared_dict stays empty

2024-09-22 Thread Marc via dovecot
I am creating the mailbox like this: doveadm -o mail_gid=testgroup2 mailbox create -u usertest shared/sharedtest1 I can set acl's (I think), at least the acl get produces the same. doveadm acl set -u usertest shared/sharedtest1 user=usertest6 lookup read write write-seen insert post doveadm a

dovecot supports filesystem acls?

2024-09-22 Thread Marc via dovecot
doveadm -o mail_gid=testgroup2 mailbox create -u usertest public/publictest1 public/mdbox/mailboxes) failed: Operation not permitted [@public]# getfacl mdbox/ # file: mdbox/ # owner: root # group: root user::rwx group::rwx group:testgroup2:rwx group:testgroup3:rwx mask::rwx other::--- _

RE: public mailbox filesystem layout + permission best practice

2024-09-22 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > I have some issues testing public mailboxes with linux users and groups > > creating mailboxes for users for the first group is not really a problem: > > doveadm -o mail_gid=testgroup2 mailbox create -u usertest > public/publictest1 > doveadm -o mail_gid=testgroup2 mailbox create -u usertest

public mailbox filesystem layout + permission best practice

2024-09-22 Thread Marc via dovecot
I have some issues testing public mailboxes with linux users and groups creating mailboxes for users for the first group is not really a problem: doveadm -o mail_gid=testgroup2 mailbox create -u usertest public/publictest1 doveadm -o mail_gid=testgroup2 mailbox create -u usertest6 public/publicte

sieve combine or not to be combine ?

2024-09-21 Thread Marc via dovecot
I am cleaning a bit my sieve scripts and wondered if I should stick to this solution sieve_before = sieve_before2 = sieve_before3 = or just one sieve_before = and put all scripts in this one. What are the advantages / disadvantages of doing this? __

RE: Free ecards

2024-09-20 Thread Marc via dovecot
> Amelia Marie via dovecot skrev den 2024-09-20 08:44: > > Free ecards from Sendwishonline.com are designed to create memorable > > and engaging experiences. Many cards feature interactive elements, such > > as animations and music, that enhance the recipient's experience. This > > level of creativ

0000002e: 5: filter action: program indicated false result

2024-09-19 Thread Marc via dovecot
I am trying to modify the body of message with a global sieve script. It looks like that sieve-test does not generate this error, however I am not really able to verify the output. There does not seem to be an option to catch the output (new message) trace log 0008:3: finishing match

User is missing UID

2024-09-19 Thread Marc via dovecot
sieve-test(1164123): Fatal: Couldn't drop privileges: User is missing UID (see mail_uid setting) I don't get what this is about. Users are not missing an UID and how is it related with testing sieve scripts? ___ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.

RE: sieve: Terminated with non-zero exit code 2

2024-09-18 Thread Marc via dovecot
> > What could this be, I am not even having an exit code 2 in my sieve > plugin. If I cat a message via cli I am getting exit code 0. > > ps where are stderr messages logged of the plugin? > script is ok Debug: sieve: Finished running script (status=ok, resource usage: no usage recorded) __

sieve: Terminated with non-zero exit code 2

2024-09-18 Thread Marc via dovecot
What could this be, I am not even having an exit code 2 in my sieve plugin. If I cat a message via cli I am getting exit code 0. ps where are stderr messages logged of the plugin? ___ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an em

  1   2   >