Tks Timo...
Em 23 de fevereiro de 2012 21:34, Timo Sirainen escreveu:
> On 23.2.2012, at 18.19, Alex Baule wrote:
>
>> ok, inside my expunged rewrite function i create the array like quota
>> does, and append it to my array.
>>
>> struct emexis_ids_x_uis append_uis;
>> append_uis.ids = _mail->u
Hello Dovecot users!
There seems to be a new dependency in some modules (eg, lib-storage,
libdovecot-lda, libdovecot-ssl) on OpenSSL. In Dovecot 2.0, those
modules didn't require OpenSSL, but 2.1 does.
For the linking process the path to the OpenSSL library isn't
specified properly (SSL_L
On 22/02/2012 23:56, Ed W wrote:
I think it has potential though. I think a lot of the current plugins
on the website could easily be rewritten, likely without performance
concerns, using a scripting based plugin system. I could see that
some other big picture pieces could potentially benefit
On 23.2.2012, at 18.19, Alex Baule wrote:
> ok, inside my expunged rewrite function i create the array like quota
> does, and append it to my array.
>
> struct emexis_ids_x_uis append_uis;
> append_uis.ids = _mail->uid;
> append_uis.uis_file = bodyFile;
..
> But when i do a foreach in this Array,
From: "Peter A. Giessel" :
Not totally true. Typical cyrus sasl2 implementation used with
sendmail uses an imap server for smtp authentication. I recall having
to tweak the sasl2 configuration on my own sendmail server to talk
correctly with dovecot. I don't recall the exact tweaks.
Just t
On 23.2.2012, at 19.31, Keith Christian wrote:
> Hello, I'm new to dovecot, and, due to having an older version of an
> OS installed on a test server, I'll be using an older version of
> dovecot (dovecot-1.0-1.2) to provide IMAP services.
I think Dovecot v2.x works mostly on the same OSes as v1.x
On 24.2.2012, at 1.26, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 23.2.2012, at 21.56, Tóth Attila wrote:
>
>> In the mean time I've upgraded to 2.1.
>> I've enabled debug logging and logged in.
>>
>> I suspect that hardening features can be blamed for my problem. After
>> booting a previous kernel the behavior
On 23.2.2012, at 21.56, Tóth Attila wrote:
> In the mean time I've upgraded to 2.1.
> I've enabled debug logging and logged in.
>
> I suspect that hardening features can be blamed for my problem. After
> booting a previous kernel the behavior was reverted.
OK.
> Feb 23 20:50:12 atoth dovecot: i
On 24.2.2012, at 0.33, Wilberth Perez wrote:
> Does any one , knows if is possible configure dovecot for limit max
> number of connections for IP address?
>
> I would like to prevent future fork-bombing attacks for pop3 and imap
> login process in my email server.
>
> Our dovecot version is : 1
On Thursday 23 February 2012 22:12:14 mail...@securitylabs.it wrote:
> Il 23/02/2012 21:41, Marc Perkel ha scritto:
> > Not sure how this can be done.
> >
> > Right now I'm running a free backup MX record service. People point
> > their high MX records to my servers and if they go down we store th
Hi List:
Does any one , knows if is possible configure dovecot for limit max
number of connections for IP address?
I would like to prevent future fork-bombing attacks for pop3 and imap
login process in my email server.
Our dovecot version is : 1.2.10
Thanks,
Wilberth.
smime.p7s
Descripti
Il 23/02/2012 21:41, Marc Perkel ha scritto:
Not sure how this can be done.
Right now I'm running a free backup MX record service. People point
their high MX records to my servers and if they go down we store the
email. When they come back up it's delivered.
Hi, store how? In a queue with s
Not sure how this can be done.
Right now I'm running a free backup MX record service. People point
their high MX records to my servers and if they go down we store the
email. When they come back up it's delivered.
What I want to do is have a premium service that would allow them to
view thro
In the mean time I've upgraded to 2.1.
I've enabled debug logging and logged in.
I suspect that hardening features can be blamed for my problem. After
booting a previous kernel the behavior was reverted.
Here is what I got. As I can make it out it uses the proper user for the
imap process accordi
Hi --
On 21.02.2012, at 23:03, Michael Grimm wrote:
> On 21.02.2012, at 22:57, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> Probably intentional. Even if it didn't give that error message, it would
>> fail because v2.0 and v2.1 uses a slightly different protocol (I thought
>> about making it backwards compatible, b
http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2009-March/038435.html
--
dr Tóth Attila, Radiológus, 06-20-825-8057
Attila Toth MD, Radiologist, +36-20-825-8057
2012.Február 23.(Cs) 18:10 időpontban Steve Campbell ezt írta:
>
>
> On 2/23/2012 11:33 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:16:34AM -050
On 2012-02-23 11:36 AM, GASPARD Kévin wrote:
Also my pastes will be destroyed in something like one day, that's
stupid (that's originally for IRC), so this is the output of my :
dovecot -n : http://pastebin.com/Tewcb7bm
telnet : http://pastebin.com/6gY2puxF
netstat -Nnap | grep "dovecot" : http
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:10:20PM -0500, Steve Campbell wrote:
> On 2/23/2012 11:33 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> >On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:16:34AM -0500, Steve Campbell wrote:
> >>Why is dovecot involved in my smtp processes and how do I fix
> >>this.
> >I would question that these failures are in fac
Hello, I'm new to dovecot, and, due to having an older version of an
OS installed on a test server, I'll be using an older version of
dovecot (dovecot-1.0-1.2) to provide IMAP services.
On this wiki page
(http://wiki.dovecot.org/BasicConfiguration?highlight=%28passwd.dovecot%29)
There are instruc
>
> If you are using sendmail as the MTA, Dovecot is not involved for
> authentication on mail submission. The maillog line you provided does not
> contain enough information to tell what triggered the error.
Not totally true. Typical cyrus sasl2 implementation used with sendmail uses an
imap
On 2/23/2012 11:33 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:16:34AM -0500, Steve Campbell wrote:
I've been trying to get smtp auth set up for days. All my sendmail
and sasl2 stuff seems to be proper, but the user can't use the
system on port 587, which is where I require authorization.
Hi Steve,
At 07:16 23-02-2012, Steve Campbell wrote:
I've been trying to get smtp auth set up for days. All my sendmail
and sasl2 stuff seems to be proper, but the user can't use the
system on port 587, which is where I require authorization.
Now I see where messages are in my maillog of the t
I'm sorry, some one tell me my netstat (on IRC) is useless.
Also my pastes will be destroyed in something like one day, that's
stupid (that's originally for IRC), so this is the output of my :
dovecot -n : http://pastebin.com/Tewcb7bm
telnet : http://pastebin.com/6gY2puxF
netstat -Nnap | grep
On 2/23/2012 11:23 AM, Peter A. Giessel wrote:
I've been trying to get smtp auth set up for days. All my sendmail and sasl2
stuff seems to be proper, but the user can't use the system on port 587, which
is where I require authorization.
My guess is that your sasl2 configuration is configured
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:16:34AM -0500, Steve Campbell wrote:
> I've been trying to get smtp auth set up for days. All my sendmail
> and sasl2 stuff seems to be proper, but the user can't use the
> system on port 587, which is where I require authorization.
>
> Now I see where messages are in my
Hi,
I've a problem with Dovecot and Thunderbird. Actually I'm trying to
setup a virtual host server mail with postfix + dovecot (2.0.9) on
CentOS 6.2. This is my dovecot -n : http://pastebin.com/wZWAE5Cj (I
guess the errors are not important, that's just saying there is some
obsoletes values,
>
> I've been trying to get smtp auth set up for days. All my sendmail and sasl2
> stuff seems to be proper, but the user can't use the system on port 587,
> which is where I require authorization.
My guess is that your sasl2 configuration is configured to use your imap server
to authenticate
On 2/23/2012 10:47 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-02-23 10:16 AM, Steve Campbell wrote:
Why is dovecot involved in my smtp processes
Because you told it to?
Where did I tell it to do this.
and how do I fix this.
Depends on what your intent is - what MTA you use - how it is
configu
Op 2/23/2012 4:37 PM, Adam Szpakowski schreef:
On 23.02.2012 02:15, Stephan Bosch wrote:
* I've just created an alternative that implements something similar
to the Procmail code you posted above, but from within Sieve itself.
[cut]
Great extension. I'll try and use it on one of the servers as
On 2012-02-23 10:16 AM, Steve Campbell wrote:
Why is dovecot involved in my smtp processes
Because you told it to?
and how do I fix this.
Depends on what your intent is - what MTA you use - how it is configured
- etc...
I've got some very mad users.
Don't make changes to an existing
On 2/23/2012 10:30 AM, Adam Szpakowski wrote:
On 23.02.2012 16:16, Steve Campbell wrote:
I've been trying to get smtp auth set up for days. All my sendmail
and sasl2 stuff seems to be proper, but the user can't use the system
on port 587, which is where I require authorization.
Now I see wh
On 23.02.2012 02:15, Stephan Bosch wrote:
On 2/22/2012 12:15 AM, Adam Szpakowski wrote:
Maybe there is a way to use a procmail with something like this:
:0 Wh: msgid.lock
| formail -D 8192 .msgid.cache
But is there a safe way to use it together with sieve? Using
Pigeonhole Sieve Pipe Plugin?
On 23.02.2012 16:16, Steve Campbell wrote:
I've been trying to get smtp auth set up for days. All my sendmail and
sasl2 stuff seems to be proper, but the user can't use the system on
port 587, which is where I require authorization.
Now I see where messages are in my maillog of the type:
auth
I've been trying to get smtp auth set up for days. All my sendmail and
sasl2 stuff seems to be proper, but the user can't use the system on
port 587, which is where I require authorization.
Now I see where messages are in my maillog of the type:
auth: pam_unix(dovecot:auth) : authentication fa
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.1.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.1.tar.gz.sig
v2.1.0 had a couple of bugs, but overall people have been pretty quiet
about it. I'm hoping v2.1.2 won't need to be released for many more
weeks. :)
BTW. v2.2 branch has also been opened
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 09:03 +0100, "Tóth Attila" wrote:
> Unfortunately I can see, that in my case /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap
> accesses both the inbox and the mail directories of the user as root.
> Moreover, it creates the lock file as root. I can see no process running
> as the user.
>
> How cou
Unfortunately I can see, that in my case /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap
accesses both the inbox and the mail directories of the user as root.
Moreover, it creates the lock file as root. I can see no process running
as the user.
How could I teach dovecot to start the imap process as the user. What
confi
37 matches
Mail list logo
