http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2009-March/038435.html -- dr Tóth Attila, Radiológus, 06-20-825-8057 Attila Toth MD, Radiologist, +36-20-825-8057
2012.Február 23.(Cs) 18:10 időpontban Steve Campbell ezt írta: > > > On 2/23/2012 11:33 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:16:34AM -0500, Steve Campbell wrote: >>> I've been trying to get smtp auth set up for days. All my sendmail >>> and sasl2 stuff seems to be proper, but the user can't use the >>> system on port 587, which is where I require authorization. >>> >>> Now I see where messages are in my maillog of the type: >>> >>> auth: pam_unix(dovecot:auth) : authentication failure ........ >>> >>> Why is dovecot involved in my smtp processes and how do I fix >>> this. >> I would question that these failures are in fact related to what >> Sendmail is doing. Does Sendmail even support Dovecot SASL? AFAIK it >> does not, therefore there is no way that Dovecot could possibly >> interfere with SMTP AUTH in Sendmail. > Why is sendmail using Dovecot sasl when I have the regular sasl set up. > > If I turn off dovecot, telnet to 587, I get no failures in my logs. If I > turn on dovecot and do the same, I get auth failures in my secure file. >> >>> I've got some very mad users. >> And you are jumping to conclusions. I suggest that you take this >> matter to a Sendmail forum. When you do, provide all relevant >> configuration as well as complete logging to show the problem. No >> useful help is possible with what you posted here. > > In other words, don't use sendmail if I use dovecot? >> >>> The 10-auth.conf file is pretty much >>> stock except for allowing plain text logins. > > I'm really having problems following the logic here. Seems that postfix > and dovecot are the only way to go if I use alternate ports with smtp > auth. Is that what everyone is implying? > > I'll try to see what sendmail guys are saying, but I don't think they'll > provide much as long as it involves dovecot. > > Thanks for the help > > steve >
