On 11/15/2011 3:30 AM, Alex wrote:
I have a number of procmail scripts and I've converted them to sieve,
but they didn't convert very well. Can someone show me how to convert
the following:
:0
{
:0 fhW
| /home/alex/bin/process-mail.pl
}
The script skipped right over that.
The Sieve la
> I'm trying to setup the dovecot DRAC plugin as described here:
> Is there anything special that needs to be done for getenv("IP") to report the
> login IP? I tried to put getenv("RIP") for remote ip and even getenv("USER")
> as well but always get NULL. Is this API only for dovecot 1.x? If
Hi - new to the list, can't find much on this using google.
I'm trying to setup the dovecot DRAC plugin as described here:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/PopBSMTPAndDovecot#DRAC
DRAC is installed and running using this startup command:
/usr/local/sbin/rpc.dracd -i -e 5 /etc/postfix/dracd.db
I d
Hi,
I have a fedora15 system with dovecot-v2.0.15, dovecot-pigeonhole and
and amavisd-new and would like to implement it on my system using
postfix. I've read the basic wiki documentation, but I really can't
figure out the proper starting point in my case. I've enabled
"protocol lda" in 15-lda.con
Hi Timo,
Thanks for the quick reply.
> Are you sure the UIDLs are the problem? Did you connect to old and new POP3
> server and compare their UIDL lists?
No not 100% sure that the UIDLs are the issue; but running into dead ends with
what I have tried.
I will compare the UIDL lists from the old
On 14.11.2011, at 11.51, Kai Arif wrote:
> attached you'll find a patch for cmd-thread.c which addresses a problem with
> certain clients in
> conjunction with the use of the UID THREAD REFS command:
>
> TAG5 UID THREAD REFS us-ascii SINCE 14-May-2011
> * THREAD
> (0)(246)(247)(248)(249)(250)(25
On 15.11.2011, at 2.08, Steve H wrote:
> I am trying to migrate an existing Exim + qpopper - mbox (pop3 only)
> installation over to Exim + Dovecot using mdir (pop3 and imap)
> And am running into problems with preserving the XUIDL headers.
Are you sure the UIDLs are the problem? Did you connect
On 14.11.2011, at 16.35, Alexander Chekalin wrote:
> 1. mdbox uses 'a lot' files (m.1, m.2 ... etc), and the default size if 2Mb.
> Looks like not even every message can fit into such storage container volume
> (nowadays we used to see messages of 20Mb and even more).
The messages are never spl
Hello All,
I am new to Dovecot and the Dovecot mailing list.
I am trying to migrate an existing Exim + qpopper - mbox (pop3 only)
installation over to Exim + Dovecot using mdir (pop3 and imap)
And am running into problems with preserving the XUIDL headers.
I am running Dovecot 2.0.14
I have us
Locking issues on mbox is the reason for my long-lasting love affair with
maildir, and it's lasts long years. Ok, the life's lessons are like this, learn
something and move on with it ;) even if it's "new old thing". Thank you for
pointing that!
What I was doubt about is default rotate size of
On 11/14/2011 4:27 AM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> Agree. A non-clustered fs should give you better performance, and
> probably also be more reliable, if you can live with the SPoF and
> full downtime during patching/upgrades/maintenance. But I would expect
> xfs to be a better choice than ext*.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Mark Moseley wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Mark Moseley wrote:
>> I've been goofing with this all day with 2.0.15 and I'm starting to
>> realize that either a) I'm not that smart, b) it's been so long since
>> I messed with namespaces that I'm going a
On 11/14/2011 8:35 AM, Alexander Chekalin wrote:
> Timo, Stan,
>
> I've just tested mdbox and find it pretty nice for me, but now I got
> some questions for you:
>
> 1. mdbox uses 'a lot' files (m.1, m.2 ... etc), and the default size if
> 2Mb. Looks like not even every message can fit into such
Timo, Stan,
I've just tested mdbox and find it pretty nice for me, but now I got
some questions for you:
1. mdbox uses 'a lot' files (m.1, m.2 ... etc), and the default size if
2Mb. Looks like not even every message can fit into such storage
container volume (nowadays we used to see messages
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 04:17:06PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> doveadm mailbox list -u admin@domain "sales/CustA/*" |
> while read mailbox; do
> doveadm acl set -u user@domain "$mailbox" user@domain +lrw
> done
Have the +lrw modifiers been implemented at all? I can only get it to work
with
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:34:02AM +0100, Peer Heinlein wrote:
> > > I have> 11 TB hard used Mailstorage, saved als maildir in ext3 on
> > > HP EVA.
> >
> > You have 11 TB of mails on a non cluster filesystem?
>
> Yes.
>
> I don't believe a clustered filesystem would have more performance and
On 13-11-2011 11:40, Scott Lewis wrote:
My apologies for the repost yesterday; it was not intentional. I was attempting
to post a followup from my mobile, when something went awry with the editing
options on my phone.
Anyway..
I have managed to download and compile my own patched
dovecot/do
Hi all,
attached you'll find a patch for cmd-thread.c which addresses a problem with
certain clients in
conjunction with the use of the UID THREAD REFS command:
TAG5 UID THREAD REFS us-ascii SINCE 14-May-2011
* THREAD
(0)(246)(247)(248)(249)(250)(252)(253)(254)(255)(256)(257)(258)(259)(260)(261)
Am Montag, 14. November 2011, 00:31:24 schrieb Patrick Westenberg:
> > I have> 11 TB hard used Mailstorage, saved als maildir in ext3 on
> > HP EVA.
>
> You have 11 TB of mails on a non cluster filesystem?
Yes.
I don't believe a clustered filesystem would have more performance and
would be m
19 matches
Mail list logo
