On Dec 13, 2010, at 9:25 PM, Daniel Senie wrote:
I am attempting to test out dovecot on a server on a separate IP
address from the live, functioning UW-IMAP. I am having mixed
results with dovecot. An entirely new account that's never been used
with UW-IMAP seems to work fine, but that's r
I am attempting to test out dovecot on a server on a separate IP address from
the live, functioning UW-IMAP. I am having mixed results with dovecot. An
entirely new account that's never been used with UW-IMAP seems to work fine,
but that's really not the point of the exercise.
If I try changing
Dec 14 00:15:54 vm dovecot: IMAP(#...@): Maildir filename has wrong
W value:
/var/vmail/#//cur/#.M###.??..??.??,S=4951,W=5057:2,RSa
Dear Dovecot elite,
This morning I woke up to find my mail server hard disk controller had
gone crazy and decided to corrupt my file
Javier de Miguel Rodríguez put forth on 12/13/2010 1:26 AM:
> Sadly, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 does not support natively XFS. I
> can install it via CentosPlus, but we need Red Hat support if somethings
> goes VERY wrong. Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 supports XFS (and gives me
> dovecot 2.0),
On 12/3/10 3:14 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 3.12.2010, at 22.19, Tom Lieuallen wrote:
I'm trying to get the snarf plugin working with dovecot 2.0.7. Specifically, I
want to use the UW-IMAP style optional snarfing.
v2.0.7? It requires v2.0.8, which I just released..
Well, that seems impor
>> New subscriber here. I noticed that the FTS index is not used in compound
>> searches. Is this expected? Tested in 2.0.0 and 2.0.8:
>
> Yep. It's been in TODO for a while.
OK, thanks -- didn't think to look there. I see that it's a pretty long list.
I'll look for a workaround unless you thin
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:48:03 +
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 13.12.2010, at 17.41, Ted To wrote:
>
> > Dec 13 12:36:57 kahlo postfix/smtpd[26253]: warning: SASL
> > authentication problem: unable to open Berkeley db /etc/sasldb2: No
> > such file or directory Dec 13 12:36:57 kahlo postfix/smtpd[
http://samec.org.ua/
On 12/12/2010 00:49, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
> Since Javier is looking for ways to decrease I/O load on the SAN, not
> necessarily increase Dovecot performance, I think putting the index
> files on a ramdisk is best thing to try first. It may not be a silver
> bullet. If he's still got spare memo
On 13.12.2010, at 17.41, Ted To wrote:
> Dec 13 12:36:57 kahlo postfix/smtpd[26253]: warning: SASL
> authentication problem: unable to open Berkeley db /etc/sasldb2: No
> such file or directory Dec 13 12:36:57 kahlo postfix/smtpd[26253]:
> warning: SASL authentication problem: unable to open Berke
On 12/13/2010 12:06 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 13.12.2010, at 17.01, Tom Talpey wrote:
Dec 13 11:48:30 managesieve(x...@yy.com): Error: user x...@yy.com:
Initialization failed: Namespace 'Mobile/': Unknown mail storage driver virtual
I do have such a virtual namespace defined in dovecot.con
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:15:00 +
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 13.12.2010, at 17.08, Ted To wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:50:27 +
> > Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >
> >> CRAM-MD5 is incompatible with PAM.
> >> http://wiki.dovecot.org/Authentication/Mechanisms
> >
> > After reconfiguring the
On 13.12.2010, at 17.30, Patrick McLean wrote:
> I just did that, and things seem to be _mostly_ working. It seems that
> deliver/dovecot-lda is ignoring the extra fields parameter (I am using
> the user's .forward file to invoke the lda). It keeps trying to deliver
> to the Maildir rather than th
Hi,
On 13/12/10 08:05 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 15:07 -0700, Willie Gillespie wrote:
>>> Thanks for the reply, although I am not sure you understand the
>>> question. I know what I need to do, I just don't know how (syntax to use
>>> in the dovecot configuration file) to cha
On 13.12.2010, at 17.08, Ted To wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:50:27 +
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>> CRAM-MD5 is incompatible with PAM.
>> http://wiki.dovecot.org/Authentication/Mechanisms
>
> After reconfiguring the client to use LOGIN rather than CRAM-MD5, I
> still get the following error
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:50:27 +
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> CRAM-MD5 is incompatible with PAM.
> http://wiki.dovecot.org/Authentication/Mechanisms
After reconfiguring the client to use LOGIN rather than CRAM-MD5, I
still get the following error: http://pastebin.com/bnhxVajc.
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 1
On 13.12.2010, at 17.01, Tom Talpey wrote:
>> Dec 13 11:48:30 managesieve(x...@yy.com): Error: user x...@yy.com:
>> Initialization failed: Namespace 'Mobile/': Unknown mail storage driver
>> virtual
>
> I do have such a virtual namespace defined in dovecot.conf, obviously,
> and it works fine w
I got around to trying the 0.2.2 managesieve listener and it's not
working for me. As soon as the client authenticates, the connection
is closed and the following is logged on the server:
Dec 13 11:48:30 managesieve(x...@yy.com): Error: user x...@yy.com:
Initialization failed: Namespace 'Mobile
On 13.12.2010, at 15.39, Ted To wrote:
> I'm trying to set up SMTP authentication on my server and am getting an
> authentication failed error. My client is set up to automatically
> select authentication method and tries CRAM_MD5. The
> http://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixAndDovecotSASL sugges
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:39:50 -0500
Ted To articulated:
> I'm trying to set up SMTP authentication on my server and am getting
> an authentication failed error. My client is set up to automatically
> select authentication method and tries CRAM_MD5. The
> http://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixAndD
I'm trying to set up SMTP authentication on my server and am getting an
authentication failed error. My client is set up to automatically
select authentication method and tries CRAM_MD5. The
http://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixAndDovecotSASL suggests "passdb
pam" and "userdb passwd" -- is it pos
On 12/13/2010 04:36 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-12-13 6:24 AM, Willie Gillespie wrote:
I'm going to guess that it's Thunderbird 3.x. It has an issue where
sometimes it (somehow) decides that it needs to keep downloading all the
messages over and over again until it fills the user's hard d
On Dec 13, 2010, at 8:06 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 14:45 -0500, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
>> Oops! Config problem. Typing should be second nature by now huh.
> ..
>>> Dec 10 13:57:57 tr27n12.aset.psu.edu dovecot: imap(tstem38): Panic: file
>>> index-transaction.c: line 71: as
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 16:31 -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> Is it possible to run the imap-login process from 1.2 against a 2.0 system?
No, they're too different.
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 10:54 +0100, Giovanni Mancuso wrote:
> > Not directly. If you don't care about mail_max_userip_connections, you
> > can force it to ignore the user's IP with some hack:
> >
> > a) modify source code
> Can i wirite a plugin to do this? Or i must modify source.
Can't do via plu
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 16:29 +0100, Harm van Tilborg wrote:
> user_query = \
> SELECT m.maildir AS home, 1001 AS uid, 1001 AS gid, \
> CONCAT('*:bytes=', m.quota, 'M') AS quota_rule, \
> 'Trash:ignore' AS quota_rule2 \
There's no need for the quota_rule2 to be here since it's always stat
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 14:45 -0500, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
> Oops! Config problem. Typing should be second nature by now huh.
..
> > Dec 10 13:57:57 tr27n12.aset.psu.edu dovecot: imap(tstem38): Panic: file
> > index-transaction.c: line 71: assertion failed: (box->opened)
What kind of a config prob
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 15:07 -0700, Willie Gillespie wrote:
> > Thanks for the reply, although I am not sure you understand the
> > question. I know what I need to do, I just don't know how (syntax to use
> > in the dovecot configuration file) to change the mail_location on a
> > per-user basis with
On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 13:14 +0100, Cor Bosman wrote:
> Is there a specific order in which one has to add servers to
> director_mail_servers, Let's say I have 20 loadbalanced director servers (I
> dont, but for arguments sake). I want to add 5 servers to
> director_mail_servers. If I do this by
On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 10:51 -0500, Tom Talpey wrote:
> 1) How can I be sure I get a core next time? I think it's because I
> run dovecot/imap under a mail uid and didn't have write permission
> to the cwd. Any way to verify that was it, and be sure it works?
http://dovecot.org/bugreport.h
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 17:29 -0500, Tony Pyro wrote:
> New subscriber here. I noticed that the FTS index is not used in compound
> searches. Is this expected? Tested in 2.0.0 and 2.0.8:
Yep. It's been in TODO for a while.
On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 21:08 +0100, Agim Cami wrote:
> What will be the right authentication scheme for a mail system with
> Microsoft Outlook as client and shadow passwords for Linux system users?
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Authentication
Only PLAIN authentication mechanism works for passwords in /e
On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 23:05 +0700, a...@test123.ru wrote:
> Does anybody know concrete answers? Let's consider IMAP and LDA and forget
> POP3.
>
> 1. Is migration to dovecot 2.0 good idea if I want to decrease I/O?
That alone makes no difference.
> 2. Can mdbox help decrease IO?
Hopefully! No
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 10:26 +0100, Javier de Miguel Rodríguez wrote:
> We can throw more hardware to this, let's see if using memory-based
> indexes (via ramdisk) we get better results. Zlib compression on indexes
> should be great for this.
Isn't it possible for Linux to compress the ramd
On 2010-12-13 6:24 AM, Willie Gillespie wrote:
> I'm going to guess that it's Thunderbird 3.x. It has an issue where
> sometimes it (somehow) decides that it needs to keep downloading all the
> messages over and over again until it fills the user's hard drive.
Bug Number please? Never had that pa
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 06:16:56 -0500
Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2010-12-13 2:45 AM, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> > On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 10:23:43 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
> >> Did you already try deleting the local copy of the Inbox?
>
> > The problem has solved. User account was recreated - that hel
Charles Marcus wrote:
Also - what version of Thunderbird is this?
I'm going to guess that it's Thunderbird 3.x. It has an issue where
sometimes it (somehow) decides that it needs to keep downloading all the
messages over and over again until it fills the user's hard drive.
I had it happen
On 2010-12-13 2:45 AM, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 10:23:43 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
>> Did you already try deleting the local copy of the Inbox?
> The problem has solved. User account was recreated - that helped.
> Also, we have this problem with various dovecot (starting fr
El 13/12/10 10:16, Brad Davidson escribió:
On Dec 12, 2010, at 23:26, Javier de Miguel Rodrí guez
wrote:
My SAN(s) (HP LeftHand Networks) do not support SSD, though. But I have
several LeftHand nodes, some of them with raid5, others with raid 1+0.
Maildirs+indexes are now in raid5, may
On Dec 12, 2010, at 23:26, Javier de Miguel Rodrí guez
wrote:
>
>My SAN(s) (HP LeftHand Networks) do not support SSD, though. But I have
> several LeftHand nodes, some of them with raid5, others with raid 1+0.
> Maildirs+indexes are now in raid5, maybe I can separate the indexes to raid
Hi Timo, im getting some director errors.
Dec 13 10:11:25 imapdirector1 dovecot: director: Error: User hash 3608614717 is
being redirected to two hosts: 194.109.26.171 and 194.109.26.141
Dec 13 10:11:25 imapdirector1 dovecot: director: Error: User hash 755231546 is
being redirected to two hosts:
41 matches
Mail list logo
