On May 19, 2009, at 1:05 AM, Max Ivanov wrote:
I'm current maintainer of dovecot packages in ALTLinux distro and I
plan to make possible to install multiple dovecot versions
side-by-side (1.0, 1.1, 1.2) to make upgrade process easier and more
robust.
So you mean actually running both at the s
I'm current maintainer of dovecot packages in ALTLinux distro and I
plan to make possible to install multiple dovecot versions
side-by-side (1.0, 1.1, 1.2) to make upgrade process easier and more
robust.
Is there any consequences of doing that? I worry about locking
maildirs and mboxes, does dov
Hi everyone:
I use dovecot only as the imap server, For smtp and pop3, I use apache james.
The dovecot version: 1.1.14
And the configuration is :
protocols: imap
ssl_disable: yes
login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login
login_executable: /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap-login
mail_location:
mbox
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 12:49 +0100, e-frog wrote:
>> Trying 1.2.beta1 with expire plugin currently:
>> When I set mail_location = maildir:~/.maildir the expire plugin doesn't
>> delete messages.
>
> Should be fixed in hg now.
>
>> My guess is that mail_location is not respe
mr.maX wrote:
>> ${domain} is a somewhat recent addition to Postfix. I guess the docs
>> could say to use ${domain} instead of ${nexthop} if Postfix is newer
>> than X (should look up what version added that).
>
> ${domain} parameter has been added starting with Postfix 2.5, which
> means that peo
On May 18, 2009, at 2:02 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 13:57 -0400, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
Yes fixed. Is it to "early" to be reporting stuff like this?
No, it's not too early. Better early than late :)
I now have this error(rev 9321:4c4b95def1fa):
"ssl-proxy.c", line 12.5
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Max Ivanov wrote:
> I use public namespace for group mailboxes. If someone sends email
> from this mailbox , MTA detects it and delivers copy of that message
> to mailbox/Sent folder, to keep history of all messages available for
> every group member. I'd like to s
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 13:57 -0400, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
> Yes fixed. Is it to "early" to be reporting stuff like this?
No, it's not too early. Better early than late :)
> I now have this error(rev 9321:4c4b95def1fa):
>
> "ssl-proxy.c", line 12.5: 1506-343 (S) Redeclaration of ssl_proxy_new
On May 17, 2009, at 2:42 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 15:04 -0400, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
Having some problems compiling on AIX 5.3 with IBM vac version 8.
Programs that I had problems building:
test-mail
test-imap
test-index
Should be fixed in hg now?
Yes fixed. Is it to
So far the crashes continue, but I haven't seen anything in particular
that sets it off. I'll trying coming up with a way of reproducing it and
get back to you if I can. In the meantime, I'm upgrading to the latest
version to see if anything changes.
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-04-23
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 17:35 +0100, Rui Carneiro wrote:
> I think binary data is being corrupted anywhere before
> fts_backend_build_more() and I don't have any idea where.
All the data comes from lib-mail/message-decoder.c. Hmm. Looks like it
tries to force giving only valid UTF-8 output. I gues
on 5-18-2009 8:46 AM Matthijs Kooijman spake the following:
> Hi Scott,
>
>> One could always run the mailstore on LVM and then you could snapshot the
>> mount and then fsck it while still technically in use. It would probably slow
>> down the filesystem, but it is still live.
> Uhm, and then you
Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
>> One could always run the mailstore on LVM and then you could snapshot the
>> mount and then fsck it while still technically in use. It would probably slow
>> down the filesystem, but it is still live.
> Uhm, and then you have a nice and fsck'd snapshot, bu
Citando Timo Sirainen :
> Nope. If you still see corruption, try with some simple test mails and
> see if it's adding garbage, losing contents or adding more content.
I tried something more advanced than that. I hexdumped my pdf test file and on
the first line I get:
25 50 44 46 2d 31
I use public namespace for group mailboxes. If someone sends email
from this mailbox , MTA detects it and delivers copy of that message
to mailbox/Sent folder, to keep history of all messages available for
every group member. I'd like to set Seen flag on all messages that
dovecots deliver puts into
${domain} is a somewhat recent addition to Postfix. I guess the docs
could say to use ${domain} instead of ${nexthop} if Postfix is newer than
X (should look up what version added that).
${domain} parameter has been added starting with Postfix 2.5, which means
that people using "enterprise" l
Hi Scott,
> One could always run the mailstore on LVM and then you could snapshot the
> mount and then fsck it while still technically in use. It would probably slow
> down the filesystem, but it is still live.
Uhm, and then you have a nice and fsck'd snapshot, but your live filesystem
will still
On May 18, 2009, at 3:56 AM, John Fawcett wrote:
Can anyone see a reason for not using always ${us...@${domain}
instead of ${us...@${nexthop}?
${domain} is a somewhat recent addition to Postfix. I guess the docs
could say to use ${domain} instead of ${nexthop} if Postfix is newer
than X (s
On May 18, 2009, at 6:42 AM, Rui Carneiro wrote:
I am having some troubles sending all data to a file. When I finish
to send all data to a file, I tried to open it and the file is
corrupted.
The first think I noticed is that all chars are capitalized what
destroy all the file format.
Wh
john...@erba.tv schrieb:
>> Hi John,
>> no i didnt wrote that, i only have u...@domain.ext
>> layout in use currently in my test servers
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards
>>
>> MfG Robert Schetterer
>>
>> Germany/Munich/Bavaria
>>
> Hi Robert
> I probably didn't make it clear. The problem with the
> publish
> Hi John,
> no i didnt wrote that, i only have u...@domain.ext
> layout in use currently in my test servers
>
> --
> Best Regards
>
> MfG Robert Schetterer
>
> Germany/Munich/Bavaria
>
Hi Robert
I probably didn't make it clear. The problem with the
published syntax is that it does not work for
rec
john...@erba.tv schrieb:
>> John Fawcett schrieb:
>>> Just a comment about the documentation for postfix integration when
>>> using receipient delimiter and delivery of user+...@domain.ext to
>>> u...@domain:
>>>
>>> http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Postfix
>>>
>> Hi John, just for info, in my test ser
On M 18 May, 2009, at 01:00 , Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 00:57 +0200, Giuliano Gavazzi wrote:
There's only one point that escapes me, why perform the conversion
when migrating (using the --convert option) given that on the system
where I did not perform it the flags have been p
Hi again,
I am having some troubles sending all data to a file. When I finish to send all
data to a file, I tried to open it and the file is corrupted.
The first think I noticed is that all chars are capitalized what destroy all
the file format.
Where are the chars capitalized?
Any other idea
> John Fawcett schrieb:
>> Just a comment about the documentation for postfix integration when
>> using receipient delimiter and delivery of user+...@domain.ext to
>> u...@domain:
>>
>> http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Postfix
>>
> Hi John, just for info, in my test server i use
>
> dovecot_destination
John Fawcett schrieb:
> Just a comment about the documentation for postfix integration when
> using receipient delimiter and delivery of user+...@domain.ext to
> u...@domain:
>
> http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Postfix
>
> I had some issues to get this working, so thought I'd share my
> experience.
Just a comment about the documentation for postfix integration when
using receipient delimiter and delivery of user+...@domain.ext to
u...@domain:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Postfix
I had some issues to get this working, so thought I'd share my
experience. Dovecot version 1.2.rc3. Postfix vers
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
> On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 01:40 +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> could you include an example for having
>> acl_shared_dict in sql ?
>
> See if you can get it working with these kind of settings:
> http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2009-April/038922.html
>
Thanks Timo, i
28 matches
Mail list logo
