On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 13:57 -0400, Jonathan Siegle wrote: > Yes fixed. Is it to "early" to be reporting stuff like this?
No, it's not too early. Better early than late :) > I now have this error(rev 9321:4c4b95def1fa): > > "ssl-proxy.c", line 12.5: 1506-343 (S) Redeclaration of ssl_proxy_new > differs from previous declaration on line 17 of "ssl-proxy.h". Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/9c6597ba9e3e
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part