On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 01:25:43PM -0800, Mark Hedges wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > Ah, this explains everything. Fixed both your problem and
> > the segfault: f831d12187d1
>
> Yes, this patch fixed the problem when applied to pristine
> 1.1.11 source.
>
> Will there be a
Dear all,
If you have a IMAP or pop3 server under load with vpopmail, can you mail
me dovecot.conf ?
Yours,
Mohsen
On Mar 2, 2009, at 8:22 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mar 2, 2009, at 7:32 PM, Mark Hedges wrote:
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I was rather thinking that maybe the kernel doesn't want
to write core files to directories that are writable by
everyone.
Could it be that dovecot uses
On Mar 2, 2009, at 7:32 PM, Mark Hedges wrote:
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I was rather thinking that maybe the kernel doesn't want
to write core files to directories that are writable by
everyone.
Could it be that dovecot uses setuid to change permissions?
Application would nee
I am sorry i meant there are no errors in any of the logs.
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 11:20:16 -0500, Charles Marcus
wrote:
> On 3/2/2009, Romer Ventura (rvent...@h-st.com) wrote:
>> There are errors in the logs..
>
> And these errors are ... secret?
>
--
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> I was rather thinking that maybe the kernel doesn't want
> to write core files to directories that are writable by
> everyone.
Could it be that dovecot uses setuid to change permissions?
Application would need 'prctl(PR_SET_DUMPABLE, 1);'
according to ht
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 13:25 -0800, Mark Hedges wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > core dumping functionality is there, but I guess the
> > problem has more to do with directory owner/permissions
> > where it's writing the core file.
>
> I was never able to get the cores to work
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Scott Silva wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Scott Silva wrote:
> >> http://kbase.redhat.com/faq/docs/DOC-4897 shows how ...
> >
> > Thanks for trying to help, I tried this too, but as I
> > reported earlier, I had tried according to the ...
> >
> Did you do it like that kb art
Lorenzo Bettini wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mar 1, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Lorenzo Bettini wrote:
We've been using an imap(s) dovecot server for a while on an ubuntu
8.04.2 and we noted that tags set by thunderbird ("important", "to
do", etc.) are almost always lost, i.e., when connecting to the
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 08:59 -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> > Some OSes/filesystems don't like that. This should help:
> > http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/71b7c7f8d7a2
> 1st question...hmm...wow. Is that a patch you just wrote?! Cool!
>
> Hmm...since I'm running on a pre-compiled package
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 07:31 -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Mar 1 13:35:10 mailserver deliver(dmil...@amfes.com):
fdatasync_path(/var/mail/amfes.com/dmiller/Maildir/INBOX/dbox-Mails)
failed: Invalid argument
Some OSes/filesystems don't like that. This should help:
Dear all,
I have compiled dovecot.When i use dovecot --build-options , i receive
following messages:
debian:/home/mohsen# dovecot --build-options
Build options: ioloop=epoll notify=inotify ipv6 openssl
Mail storages: maildir mbox dbox cydir raw
SQL d
On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 12:41 -0600, Rick Romero wrote:
> I've got a couple servers using Maildir format. As I understand it from
> a simple perspective, 'new' contains newly delivered messages, and 'cur'
> contains messages that have been 'handled'.
I'm not sure if there's anything official, but t
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 07:31 -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> Mar 1 13:35:10 mailserver deliver(dmil...@amfes.com):
> fdatasync_path(/var/mail/amfes.com/dmiller/Maildir/INBOX/dbox-Mails)
> failed: Invalid argument
Some OSes/filesystems don't like that. This should help:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dov
On 3/2/2009, Romer Ventura (rvent...@h-st.com) wrote:
> There are errors in the logs..
And these errors are ... secret?
There are errors in the logs..
On Mar 2, 2009, at 1:47 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Romer Ventura wrote:
It has been brought to my attention that outlook users cant delete
folders from their mailbox. They can move them around a
I see the following history in my log during message delivery:
Mar 1 13:35:09 mailserver postfix/pickup[21464]: 5FAFC2A002: uid=0
from=
Mar 1 13:35:09 mailserver postfix/cleanup[21526]: 5FAFC2A002:
message-id=<20090301213509.5fafc2a...@mailserver.amfeslan.local>
Mar 1 13:35:09 mailserver pos
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mar 1, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Lorenzo Bettini wrote:
We've been using an imap(s) dovecot server for a while on an ubuntu
8.04.2 and we noted that tags set by thunderbird ("important", "to
do", etc.) are almost always lost, i.e., when connecting to the same
imap account from
On Mar 1, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Lorenzo Bettini wrote:
We've been using an imap(s) dovecot server for a while on an ubuntu
8.04.2 and we noted that tags set by thunderbird ("important", "to
do", etc.) are almost always lost, i.e., when connecting to the same
imap account from another machine, t
> - Original Message -
> From: "Timo Sirainen"
> To: "k bah"
> Cc: dovecot@dovecot.org
> Subject: Re: [Dovecot] One Dovecot serving 2 domains - possible?
> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:58:09 -0500
>
>
> On Feb 27, 2009, at 8:21 AM, k bah wrote:
>
> >> The above assert isn't from v1.1.11 a
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 3/2/2009, Lorenzo Bettini (bett...@dsi.unifi.it) wrote:
what other information can I provide?
dovecot -n output might help, but you are using an older version, I'd
first try upgrading... there have been a ton of fixes since the version
you're running...
Only, a new ve
On 3/2/2009, Lorenzo Bettini (bett...@dsi.unifi.it) wrote:
> what other information can I provide?
dovecot -n output might help, but you are using an older version, I'd
first try upgrading... there have been a ton of fixes since the version
you're running...
Only, a new version 1.1.12 is imminen
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 3/1/2009 2:08 PM, Lorenzo Bettini wrote:
We've been using an imap(s) dovecot server for a while on an ubuntu
8.04.2 and we noted that tags set by thunderbird ("important", "to do",
etc.) are almost always lost, i.e., when connecting to the same imap
account from another
On 3/1/2009 2:08 PM, Lorenzo Bettini wrote:
> We've been using an imap(s) dovecot server for a while on an ubuntu
> 8.04.2 and we noted that tags set by thunderbird ("important", "to do",
> etc.) are almost always lost, i.e., when connecting to the same imap
> account from another machine, the tags
On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 22:37 -0800, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Rick Romero wrote:
>
> > So I'm left with a quandry. I guess the simple question is, Should mail
> > in cur, EVER not have a flag? I suppose if it were marked as UNSEEN
> > after being SEEN, that's possible. So I j
25 matches
Mail list logo
