On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:10:29PM -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 16:27 +0100, Ulrich Zehl wrote:
> > I did
> >
> > # mount -o remount,actimeo=0 /srv/storage
>
> To both servers?
There's three Dovecot servers (NFS clients), actually, and I remounted
/srv/storage on all of th
This is with respect to an error that I am facing in dovecot.
The error is that is seen in logs is "Feb 23 00:04:46 mailblade1
dovecot: IMAP(USERNAME): /indexes/USERNAME/.INBOX/dovecot-uidlist:
Duplicate file entry at line 7:
1234776125.M559298P3988.s2o.qlc.co.in,S=13111,W=13470:2, (uid 94277 ->
9
thanx timo, u were right. i am confusing things.
vmail needs to exist as a unix user (nologin priveleges) not as a virtual user.
just give ownership of the folders to vmail... since postfix LDA doesnt need
to acccess the folders anymore...
right? will test dovecot lda and report back.
> >
>
On Feb 23, 2009, at 9:35 PM, Linux Advocate wrote:
I just heard that Postfix doesn't allow you to do that (as you
would have
noticed too). So just use vmail.
Ok. but its amazing that dovecot can deliver as vmail, a user who
doesnt exist.how does it accomplish this?
Huh? Maybe you're
> >>> my /home/vmail/ directories are owned by postfix. do i then need to make
> >> vmail a member of the group?
> >>
> >> You could just execute Dovecot LDA using postfix user.
> >>
> >
> > Therefore, ( copied from dovecot wiki, http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Postfix )
> >
> >
> > dovecot u
On Feb 23, 2009, at 9:23 PM, Linux Advocate wrote:
Timo, if we use the dovecot LDA, we do need to create a user
"vmail" , with no
login priveleges etc?
No.
my /home/vmail/ directories are owned by postfix. do i then need
to make
vmail a member of the group?
You could just execute Doveco
> >>
> >>> 3. Quota Management ( Creating, enforcing, notifying ) - is it done thru
> >> dovecot or postfix or are both needed?
> >>
> >> Depends on if you use Dovecot LDA. If not, then both.
> >
> > Timo, if we use the dovecot LDA, we do need to create a user "vmail" , with
> > no
> login
On Feb 23, 2009, at 8:49 PM, Linux Advocate wrote:
On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 23:58 -0800, Linux Advocate wrote:
2. What is the benefit of using Dovecot's SASL as compared to
Cyrus SASL? Is
there better performance?
Probably not, but I've always hated configuring Cyrus SASL. It's
not as
f
>
> On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 23:58 -0800, Linux Advocate wrote:
> > 2. What is the benefit of using Dovecot's SASL as compared to Cyrus SASL?
> > Is
> there better performance?
>
> Probably not, but I've always hated configuring Cyrus SASL. It's not as
> flexible and the error and debug message
Thank you for the suggestion.
Will this still work if I'm using the maildir format? (Something I
should've mentioned upfront, sorry...)
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 5:17 AM, Darabos Edvárd Konrád <
n...@hippy.csoma.elte.hu> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> EXAMPLES
> ...
> To convert a non-standard mailbox f
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 22:55 +0100, Edgar Fuß wrote:
> I'm trying to integrate both the new sieve implementation and managesieve
> into pkgsrc.
>
> Managesieve seems to need some dovecot libraries that dovecot doesn't install
> (lib-storage/libstorage.a, lib-auth/libauth.a, lib-imap/libimap.a,
>
I'm trying to integrate both the new sieve implementation and managesieve into
pkgsrc.
Managesieve seems to need some dovecot libraries that dovecot doesn't install
(lib-storage/libstorage.a, lib-auth/libauth.a, lib-imap/libimap.a,
lib-index/libindex.a, lib-mail/libmail.a, lib-charset/libcharse
2009/2/23 Stephan Bosch :
> This was also an issue for `deliver -p` and this is fixed by Timo.
That's fantastic Stephan, thanks!
Ian P. Christian schreef:
2009/2/23 Ian P. Christian :
I'm not sure what it is I'm doing wrong here, perhaps my 'test' mail
is not in the format expected by sieve-test.
I don't know why I didn't figure this out from my previous mail/error.
sieve-test appears not to handle relative paths as it
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 13:14 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
> > And having Dovecot support also client SASL would require a lot of
> > new code which isn't used by Dovecot itself anywhere.
>
> I understand... but it would still be nice... ;) maybe a good candidate
> for the Goggle Summer of Code?
Ma
On 2/23/2009 12:12 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
2. What is the benefit of using Dovecot's SASL as compared to
Cyrus SASL? Is there better performance?
>>> Probably not, but I've always hated configuring Cyrus SASL. It's
>>> not as flexible and the error and debug messages are worse.
>> I a
Timo Sirainen schreef:
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 09:50 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2/23/2009 9:21 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 23:58 -0800, Linux Advocate wrote:
2. What is the benefit of using Dovecot's SASL as compared to Cyrus SASL? Is
there better performance?
Probably
On 23.02.2009 09:13 Johan Hendriks wrote:
> One more question regarding this.
> All the howto's are using a seperate user for the dovecot LDA, like vmail.
> Now all my mailboxes have the userid and groupid from postfix.
> Can i use the postfix user for the dovecot LDA?
>
Citing PIPE(8postfix):
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 09:50 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2/23/2009 9:21 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 23:58 -0800, Linux Advocate wrote:
> >> 2. What is the benefit of using Dovecot's SASL as compared to Cyrus SASL?
> >> Is there better performance?
> >
> > Probably not
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 16:27 +0100, Ulrich Zehl wrote:
> > > On the client side, it's Linux 2.6.23.16. All attribute cache related
> > > values are at their default, as far as I can tell. The entry in fstab
> > > reads:
> > >
> > > nfs-server:/srv/storage /srv/storage nfs
> > > rw,nfsvers=3,hard,i
2009/2/23 Ian P. Christian :
> I'm not sure what it is I'm doing wrong here, perhaps my 'test' mail
> is not in the format expected by sieve-test.
I don't know why I didn't figure this out from my previous mail/error.
sieve-test appears not to handle relative paths as it's 2nd param.
This works:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm using dovecot lda in a qmail / vpopmail testing environnement.
I would like to replace vpopmail lda with dovecot's one , because of
quotas , sieve filers, indexing while delivering ...
Everything is working great, except the catchall.
If I
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 05:50:28PM -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 08:30 +0100, Ulrich Zehl wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:02:19AM -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > > Perhaps the NFS cache flushing doesn't work then for some reason. What
> > > OS (kernel) are you using on t
On 2/23/2009 9:21 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 23:58 -0800, Linux Advocate wrote:
>> 2. What is the benefit of using Dovecot's SASL as compared to Cyrus SASL?
>> Is there better performance?
>
> Probably not, but I've always hated configuring Cyrus SASL. It's not as
> flexibl
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 17:59 +0100, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
>> Which email clients support SMTP/IMAP via STDIN&STDOUT of proxy command?
>
> For which OS? I know at least Evolution, mutt and pine support imap
> proxy commands. No idea about SMTP.
For future readers referen
I'm not sure what it is I'm doing wrong here, perhaps my 'test' mail
is not in the format expected by sieve-test.
The 'test' file is a file taken directly from a dovecot maildir - so
is in the normal format of having headers, a new line, then the body.
There is nothing exceptional about this email
On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 23:58 -0800, Linux Advocate wrote:
> 2. What is the benefit of using Dovecot's SASL as compared to Cyrus SASL? Is
> there better performance?
Probably not, but I've always hated configuring Cyrus SASL. It's not as
flexible and the error and debug messages are worse.
> 3. Q
2009/2/23 Ian P. Christian :
> # sieve-test -c ../../../sieve/default.sieve
> 1235038385.M765212P13483.tch-mailstore1\,S\=3927\,W\=4017\:2\,S
> Fatal: Can't open mail stream as raw
>
Running strace on this, I see it's trying to do this:
open("sieve/default.svbin.tmp", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC, 06
Hi all,
I'm using a build of dovecot 1.2, and I'm seeing this:
# ls -al 1235038385.M765212P13483.tch-mailstore1\,S\=3927\,W\=4017\:2\,S
-rw--- 1 mail mail 3927 2009-02-19 10:13
1235038385.M765212P13483.tch-mailstore1,S=3927,W=4017:2,S
(r...@tch-mailstore1:/mailstore/mail/domain.net/i/ian/mai
On 2/22/2009, Gene Steinberg (g...@macnightowl.com) wrote:
> Linux server.paracastworld.net 2.6.27.15
Ummm... I think thats a quesion for your Distro support...
Timo can't be expected to keep up with which kernel works and which
doesn't from x number of patched kernels from x # of distro's.
--
Timo Sirainen writes:
> On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 13:10 +0100, Sascha Wilde wrote:
>> - cyrus imapd actually tries[1] to implement a variant of this
>> possibility in that it does not allow to remove the 'a' right from the
>> owner:
>
> I implemented this to Dovecot now too.
Good. :)
I just
Hi!
EXAMPLES
...
To convert a non-standard mailbox file into a standard mailbox
file you
can use:
formail -ds >new_mailbox
Or, if you have a very tolerant mailer:
formail -a Date: -ds >new_mailbox
...
These are not working based on explicit
Timo Sirainen writes:
> On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 17:48 +0100, Sascha Wilde wrote:
>> > But should it just internally convert "owner" to "username" when
>> > replying?
>>
>> From our experience this would be a very good idea. Many clients
>> recognize the username and handle those ACLs differently i
Hi,
Yeah, I'm vaguely familiar with formail, but (after reviewing the
literature) it doesn't seem like it can be used to identify/fix existing
messages (unless you already know how they're broken and give it explicit
instructions to fix them).
Is there something I'm missing?
Thanks.
On Mon, Feb
Hello!
I am not sure about what you want, but I found something that maybe
useful for you.
http://gd.tuwien.ac.at/linuxcommand.org/man_pages/formail1.html
Bye
Neil wrote:
Soapparently I have some messages which are not RFC compliant sitting in
my mailboxes (mostly older ones), and
Soapparently I have some messages which are not RFC compliant sitting in
my mailboxes (mostly older ones), and I have some software which is refusing
to handle such messages.
1. Does anyone know of a nice way to verify that all my messages are
compliant/find those that aren't? (I suppose I cou
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:58:01PM -0800, Linux Advocate wrote:
>
> Guys ,
>
> 1. What is the benefit of using Dovecot' LDA as compared to postfix's
> LDA? Will there be better performance?
With Dovecot's LDA, mailbox indexes are updated at mail delivery time
instead of (only) at pop3/imap log
You were right... I changed the %n to %Lu in the passdb file scheme and
everything is working now :-)
thx a lot
On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 13:42 +0100, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
> ben wrote:
>
> > tried %Lu, dovecot seems to still strip of the domain part before
> > looking it up in dovecot.passwd.
Johan Hendriks schreef:
Hello all.
I use dovecot in combination with postfix, postfixadmin for virtual
users.
Deliver to the mailbox now is done by postfix
Now i want to enable quota's and therefor i need dovecot deliver.
Can i just switch to dovecot deliver?
Or must i first do some prrperation
39 matches
Mail list logo
