On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 23:58 -0800, Linux Advocate wrote: > 2. What is the benefit of using Dovecot's SASL as compared to Cyrus SASL? Is > there better performance?
Probably not, but I've always hated configuring Cyrus SASL. It's not as flexible and the error and debug messages are worse. > 3. Quota Management ( Creating, enforcing, notifying ) - is it done thru > dovecot or postfix or are both needed? Depends on if you use Dovecot LDA. If not, then both.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
