On 2/23/2009 9:21 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 23:58 -0800, Linux Advocate wrote: >> 2. What is the benefit of using Dovecot's SASL as compared to Cyrus SASL? >> Is there better performance? > > Probably not, but I've always hated configuring Cyrus SASL. It's not as > flexible and the error and debug messages are worse.
I agree... but the one disadvantage to dovecot sasl is it cannot be used as CLIENT mechanism... is adding this capability by any chance on the radar? -- Best regards, Charles
