El Monday 21 July 2008 13:46:25 Timo Sirainen escribió:
> On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 09:42 +0100, Imobach González Sosa wrote:
> > I've set up some shared folders and I'm controlling the access to them
> > with the ACL plugin. As far as I know, ACL rules are not applied to
> > sub-folders, right?
>
> Ri
On Mon, July 21, 2008 14:20, M. Rodrigo Monteiro wrote:
> args: /usr/local/dovecot/etc/dovecot-ldap.conf
i am unsure how to debug ldap from here, but show this conf and i hope
others can help last thing here, the logs show me now that dovecot works,
but the ldap auth is still not working
--
B
kbajwa wrote:
Hello:
CentOS 5.2
Postfix 2.3.3 (part of CentOS install)
Dovecot 1.0.7 (part of CentOS install)
Dovecot 1.1.1 (Updated from www.atrpms.net)
Here is the problem; I do not find location of ".../dovecot/deliver"
anywhere on the system!
Use rpm to find the correct file location:
Hello:
CentOS 5.2
Postfix 2.3.3 (part of CentOS install)
Dovecot 1.0.7 (part of CentOS install)
Dovecot 1.1.1 (Updated from www.atrpms.net)
Postfix & Dovecot are working fine. While reading "Dovecot LDA with Postfix"
document at http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Postfix , I read the following
statement
Hi!
I'm currently setting up my first mailsystem based on dovecot. For a far way,
working with dovecot was very convenient, but after I had to integrate deliver,
it became massivly painful. My components are postfix as MTA, postgresql as
user database and dovecot as IMAP server. When translating
I need some help troubleshooting this problem. It only shows up with IMAP
connections. I initially thought it was related to SquirrelMail (because
it gives me an 'EXPUNGE' error), but after attempting to send IMAP commands
directly to the server as shown below, I'm thinking there is something el
On Jul 21, 2008, at 11:42 PM, Dan Price wrote:
On Sun 20 Jul 2008 at 06:05PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 17:09 -0700, Dan Price wrote:
You don't have a separate mail directory, so users sometimes list
their
entire home directory which can contain a huge directory tree,
caus
On Sun 20 Jul 2008 at 06:05PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 17:09 -0700, Dan Price wrote:
>
> You don't have a separate mail directory, so users sometimes list their
> entire home directory which can contain a huge directory tree, causing
> out of memory?
I rely on users to set th
> On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 06:42 +0100, Peter Collinson wrote:
> > I'd like to be able to deliver certain mail as 'read' from procmail.
>
> Only way I can think of would be with a Sieve script that uses the
> imap4flags extension to set the flag \seen.
Yes, that's what I did. I wanted to file al
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 18:08 +0200, Andreas M. Kirchwitz wrote:
> >> Jul 12 01:04:45 linux dovecot: Panic: IMAP(user2): file index-sync.c:
> line 39 (index_mailbox_set_recent_uid): assertion failed:
> (seq_range_exists(&ibox->recent_flags, uid))
I think I finally managed to fix this:
http://hg.d
Solution tested, problem solved - thanks!
This will greatly ease our transition to a more sensible namespace layout.
---Jack
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 09:59 -0700, Jack Stewart wrote:
The interesting part is that after upgrading to 1.1.1, the INBOX would
disappear from Thund
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 12:55 -0400, John Wells wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 12:37 -0400, John Wells wrote:
> >> Guys,
> >>
> >> We have a very large maildir for email auditing purposes. It's
> >> currently at 600 GB and
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 12:37 -0400, John Wells wrote:
>> Guys,
>>
>> We have a very large maildir for email auditing purposes. It's
>> currently at 600 GB and continues to grow.
>>
>> Can dovecot handle this with squat inde
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 12:37 -0400, John Wells wrote:
> Guys,
>
> We have a very large maildir for email auditing purposes. It's
> currently at 600 GB and continues to grow.
>
> Can dovecot handle this with squat indexing, or am I out of my mind?
You can try of course, but that might be a bit too
Guys,
We have a very large maildir for email auditing purposes. It's
currently at 600 GB and continues to grow.
Can dovecot handle this with squat indexing, or am I out of my mind?
Thanks!
John
* Timo Sirainen, 2008-07-21 14:29
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 06:40 +0200, Thomas Zajic wrote:
-> http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2008-June/031611.html
I'll see about that, but with v1.1.2 I'd recommend using fts-solr
instead. fts-lucene does things less efficiently and it has some issues
when the
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/ea00b1553ef1
Great, thanks!
>> Jul 12 01:04:45 linux dovecot: Panic: IMAP(user2): file index-sync.c: line
>> 39 (index_mailbox_set_recent_uid): assertion failed:
>> (seq_range_exists(&ibox->recent_flags, uid))
>
>> Sto
Hi there,
I'm working on converting my server from using bincimap to dovecot. I
seem to be having some trouble with folders, however. Binc was set up
like this :
depot = "IMAPdir", /* Use Maildir++ style
type = "Maildir", /* only Ma
On Monday 21 July 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 15:51 +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > On Monday 21 July 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > > + Maildir: Add ,S= to maildir filename whenever quota plugin
> > > is loaded, even when not using Maildir++ quota.
> >
> > Could
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 11:32 -0300, M. Rodrigo Monteiro wrote:
> user_attrs = mail,homeDirectory
> pass_attrs = mail,userPassword
This kind of configuration was deprecated in v1.0 and doesn't really
work in v1.1 anymore. Use instead:
user_attrs = homeDirectory=home
pass_attrs = uid=user,userPa
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 16:00 +0200, Anders wrote:
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> > http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/d46b9e8dcf13
>
> "AC_DEFINE(HAVE_BZLIB,, Define if you have zlib library)"
>
> There seems to be a copy/paste error with the "zlib" there ...
Thanks, fixed.
signature.asc
Descr
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 15:51 +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> On Monday 21 July 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> > + Maildir: Add ,S= to maildir filename whenever quota plugin
> > is loaded, even when not using Maildir++ quota.
>
> Could S= be always added even when no quota plugin is
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 14:48 +0100, Chris Wakelin wrote:
> I'm left with just (most
> of) the compile errors I mentioned in
> http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2008-June/031350.html
> plus
You mean compiler warnings? Anyway I did go through them and fixed a
couple of those, but I don't think I'
Found http://www.mailinglistarchive.com/dovecot@dovecot.org/msg03185.html,
but I don't think this is my problem because using ldapsearch I can search
using dovecot.
# /usr/local/openldap/bin/ldapsearch -x -h localhost -b
DC=X,DC=ce,DC=gov,DC=br -D cn=dovecot,dc=X,dc=ce,dc=gov,dc=br -w
XXX
I've set up some shared folders and I'm controlling the access to them with
the ACL plugin. As far as I know, ACL rules are not applied to sub-folders,
right?
Does exists any way to implement it using some dovecot feature? Or must I find
my way? Just to be sure :)
Nothing I can think of..
Servus,
Jul 16 08:45:55 servername dovecot: Panic: IMAP(user): file
message-parser.c: line 770 (message_parser_parse_next_block): assertion
failed: (ctx->input->eof
|| ctx->input->closed || ctx->input->stream_errno != 0 || ctx->broken)
Line 770.
#6 0x080bbfa0 in message_parser_parse_heade
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/d46b9e8dcf13
"AC_DEFINE(HAVE_BZLIB,, Define if you have zlib library)"
There seems to be a copy/paste error with the "zlib" there ...
Cheers,
Anders Nitpicker
On Monday 21 July 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> + Maildir: Add ,S= to maildir filename whenever quota plugin
> is loaded, even when not using Maildir++ quota.
Could S= be always added even when no quota plugin is loaded? Is there any
point in not adding S= anyway?
--
Arkadiusz Miś
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 10:14 +0100, Chris Wakelin wrote:
+ zlib plugin supports now bzip2 also.
This breaks for me on Solaris 8 and gcc 3.3.2
In file included from istream-bzlib.c:8:
/usr/include/bzlib.h:170: error: parse error before "FILE"
/usr/include/bzlib.h:198
I'll take a stab at that..
Getting started with sieve seems a big step...
On 21 Jul 2008, at 13:40, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 06:42 +0100, Peter Collinson wrote:
I'd like to be able to deliver certain mail as 'read' from procmail.
My procmail rules call deliver with -m
to di
Robert Schetterer schrieb:
Hi Timo,
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 14:35 +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
namespace shared {
..
In my meaning this shouldnt be so
only names of ( names of directories) at /usr/local/virtual/%d/%u/
should be shown , subfolders in them should only
Hi Timo,
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 14:35 +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
namespace shared {
..
In my meaning this shouldnt be so
only names of ( names of directories) at /usr/local/virtual/%d/%u/
should be shown , subfolders in them should only be
imap browseable if there
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 11:59 +0200, Andre Hübner wrote:
> Jul 16 08:45:55 servername dovecot: Panic: IMAP(user): file
> message-parser.c: line 770 (message_parser_parse_next_block): assertion
> failed: (ctx->input->eof
> || ctx->input->closed || ctx->input->stream_errno != 0 || ctx->broken)
Line
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 10:14 +0100, Chris Wakelin wrote:
> > + zlib plugin supports now bzip2 also.
>
> This breaks for me on Solaris 8 and gcc 3.3.2
>
> In file included from istream-bzlib.c:8:
> /usr/include/bzlib.h:170: error: parse error before "FILE"
> /usr/include/bzlib.h:198: error: par
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 14:35 +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> namespace shared {
..
> In my meaning this shouldnt be so
> only names of ( names of directories) at /usr/local/virtual/%d/%u/
> should be shown , subfolders in them should only be
> imap browseable if there is another dovecot-acl in th
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 09:42 +0100, Imobach González Sosa wrote:
> I've set up some shared folders and I'm controlling the access to them with
> the ACL plugin. As far as I know, ACL rules are not applied to sub-folders,
> right?
Right.
> So, when a user adds a new sub-folder, I need to add a do
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 11:43 +0800, Patrick Nagel wrote:
> > > Searching (in Subject or From header) within the Inbox turned up the
> > > missing messages though.
> >
> > If they're found when searching via Dovecot, then Dovecot sees them..
>
> Yes, searching via dovecot - FTS (Squat) is activated
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 06:42 +0100, Peter Collinson wrote:
> I'd like to be able to deliver certain mail as 'read' from procmail.
> My procmail rules call deliver with -m
> to directly to inject filtered mail to maildir based directories.
>
> I like to keep copies of mail I've sent by cc'ing it
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 09:38 +0200, Chris Laif wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 7:42 AM, Peter Collinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd like to be able to deliver certain mail as 'read' from procmail. My
> > procmail rules call deliver with -m
> > to directly to inject filtered mail to maildir
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 10:36 +0200, Ralf Becker wrote:
> ./src/plugins/quota/quota.c:
>
> Looking over the new function 'quota_root_is_visible' let's me think,
> that Grandy Fu's original solution (*) should work then, because
> 'noenforcing' does cover not only quota checking but also quota root
Timo Sirainen escreveu:
As for subscriptions and maildirsize .. well, those are more difficult
and I'm not sure if I should do such a change for v1.1.x releases
anymore since it would change the behavior.
maildirsize is actually quite discardable, so it's not a big deal.
However, the subscr
Hi,
i ve got a problem with
recursive acl, using not a vfile global backend.
( no default acl)
In my understanding
every folder(directory)
needs a seperate dovecot-acl
files with permissions.
This works fine, but my tests showed
using a shared namespace
like i.e.
namespace shared {
separator =
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 06:40 +0200, Thomas Zajic wrote:
> * Timo Sirainen, 2008-07-21 00:11
>
> > I've finally read and answered most of the mails on this list. If you
> > haven't received an answer to your question, resend it. [...]
>
> Segfaults with fts_lucene enabled - the bug report is/was f
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 06:48 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 23:53 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> > > Ok, that seems to work, but I think a better alternative would probably
> > > be to make dest_mail a struct mail ** like the context.
> >
> > That'd be an API change and I'd r
2008/7/19 Benny Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Fri, July 18, 2008 19:39, M. Rodrigo Monteiro wrote:
>
> > # id vmail
> > uid=200(vmail) gid=200(vmail) grupos=200(vmail)
>
> > first_valid_uid: 201
> > last_valid_uid: 201
> > first_valid_gid: 201
> > last_valid_gid: 201
>
> 200 vs 201 ?
>
> th
Frank Behrens schreef:
The sieve plugin compares the modification dates of sieve source and compiled script and
compiles the script only if necessary. When the managesieve extension is used, it creates a
symbolic link for the script. In order to switch between scripts managesieve changes the lin
The sieve plugin compares the modification dates of sieve source and compiled
script and
compiles the script only if necessary. When the managesieve extension is used,
it creates a
symbolic link for the script. In order to switch between scripts managesieve
changes the link
only.
Therefore t
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 23:53 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > Ok, that seems to work, but I think a better alternative would probably
> > be to make dest_mail a struct mail ** like the context.
>
> That'd be an API change and I'd rather not do that for v1.1. But I
> suppose it would be the best per
Hi,
Can you get a gdb backtrace from this crash? See
http://dovecot.org/bugreport.html
additional to my last mail now a cordump was created
this is dovecot -n
# 1.1.1: /etc/dovecot.conf
protocols: imap imaps pop3 pop3s
ssl_ca_file: /path/path/*.myservername.com.bundle.crt
ssl_cert_file: /pa
Timo Sirainen wrote:
I've finally read and answered most of the mails on this list. If you
haven't received an answer to your question, resend it. There are a
couple of tricky mbox issues left, but I'm not sure if I can do anything
about them unless someone can show me how to reproduce the probl
Hi all,
I've read this not on the v1.1.2 release candidate announce:
> If you haven't received an answer to your question, resend it.
So, I've sent this message some days ago and I've got no answer (that's fine,
no problem). So, I'm posting my question again:
I've set up some shared folders an
Timo Sirainen schrieb am 21.07.2008 02:03:
But most people haven't needed it, so it would be unnecessary extra
checks for them. Wonder if it'd be better to just let them have the
extra check or add a configuration option..
I'm also a bit worried that if this check was always done it would break
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 10:22 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It crashes because it can't find where the filesystem is mounted at. I
> don't know why that would happen, but I fixed the crash anyway:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 7:42 AM, Peter Collinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to be able to deliver certain mail as 'read' from procmail. My
> procmail rules call deliver with -m
> to directly to inject filtered mail to maildir based directories.
>
Hi, I've got an related problem: When f
54 matches
Mail list logo
