On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 06:40 +0200, Thomas Zajic wrote: > * Timo Sirainen, 2008-07-21 00:11 > > > I've finally read and answered most of the mails on this list. If you > > haven't received an answer to your question, resend it. [...] > > Segfaults with fts_lucene enabled - the bug report is/was for 1.1.0, > but it should still be valid for 1.1.1, as there were no changes to > the code in question according to the 1.1.1 Changelog: > > -> http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2008-June/031611.html
I'll see about that, but with v1.1.2 I'd recommend using fts-solr instead. fts-lucene does things less efficiently and it has some issues when the search index is tried to be accessed by multiple processes at the same time.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
