At 6:40 PM -0600 12/8/07, Darren McLaughlin wrote:
Bill,
Thanks for your detailed explanation. I apologize for using
incorrect terminology, but I am operating a little out of my depth
as I have only 2 servers with Verio. I started with them years ago,
as websites are a small part of my consult
Bill,
Thanks for your detailed explanation. I apologize for using incorrect
terminology, but I am operating a little out of my depth as I have only 2
servers with Verio. I started with them years ago, as websites are a small
part of my consulting, and as email has evolved so have the server i
Hmm. Maybe a feature packed v1.2 would be a good idea after all. It
wouldn't have any huge underlying changes, so most likely it could be
released only a few months after v1.1.
Implemented, but slightly buggy so not included in v1.1 (yet):
- Mailbox list indexes
- THREAD REFERENCES indexe
At 11:05 PM -0600 12/7/07, Darren McLaughlin wrote:
Bill,
There's a ringing endorsement of Verio.
And maybe not quite fair, since your first paraphrasing came across
as further from reality than the second...
They told me that the
server had a"group mail file" and all the users had their
On 9.12.2007, at 0.23, Peter Hessler wrote:
On 2007 Dec 09 (Sun) at 00:20:11 +0200 (+0200), Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 9.12.2007, at 0.16, Peter Hessler wrote:
There are a couple of jerks that are tying to dictionary attack my
email server, and one of the vectors is pop3/imap logins.
Somethin
On 2007 Dec 09 (Sun) at 00:20:11 +0200 (+0200), Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 9.12.2007, at 0.16, Peter Hessler wrote:
>
>> There are a couple of jerks that are tying to dictionary attack my
>> email server, and one of the vectors is pop3/imap logins. Something I
>> would like to do in dovecot, but ca
On 9.12.2007, at 0.16, Peter Hessler wrote:
There are a couple of jerks that are tying to dictionary attack my
email server, and one of the vectors is pop3/imap logins. Something I
would like to do in dovecot, but can't seem to find, is the ability to
disconnect after a certain number of errors
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007, Peter Hessler wrote:
There are a couple of jerks that are tying to dictionary attack my
email server, and one of the vectors is pop3/imap logins. Something I
would like to do in dovecot, but can't seem to find, is the ability to
disconnect after a certain number of errors.
There are a couple of jerks that are tying to dictionary attack my
email server, and one of the vectors is pop3/imap logins. Something I
would like to do in dovecot, but can't seem to find, is the ability to
disconnect after a certain number of errors. The vast majority of my
users (i.e. me)
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 22:20 +0100, Jost Krieger wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:20:12AM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 21:08 +0100, Jost Krieger wrote:
> > > The most common event is:
> > >
> > > 2007-12-06 16:00:17.837654500 dovecot: Error: IMAP(): FETCH for
>
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:20:12AM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 21:08 +0100, Jost Krieger wrote:
> > The most common event is:
> >
> > 2007-12-06 16:00:17.837654500 dovecot: Error: IMAP(): FETCH for
> > mailbox UCE-TMP UID 1547 got too little data: 5176 vs 5184
> >
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 10:11 -0500, Sacha Bernstein wrote:
> I would like to develop a new mailbox format for a very specialized
> application. Can anyone point me in the appropriate direction to get
> started writing a plugin?
>
> More detail for anyone interested:
> I need to store mail in a for
I would like to develop a new mailbox format for a very specialized
application. Can anyone point me in the appropriate direction to get
started writing a plugin?
More detail for anyone interested:
I need to store mail in a format that's quickly accessible and
modifiable to an external process.
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 04:17:22PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Deliver / LMTP server
> -
>
> Currently deliver parses dovecot.conf using its own parser. This has
> caused all kinds of problems. v2.0's master rewrite helps with this,
> because deliver can then just ask the con
On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 14:56 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > Currently deliver only logs the message id. A user would never
> > ask for this (especially if he asks where certain mails were
> > stored/discarded), he would ask for the sender's name/email or
> > subject. Is the contents of the log file
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 14:02 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > You mention some problems like unique ID's. This is actually pretty
> > simple - just use some GUID type process. All you need is something
> > guaranteed unique on each server, combinations of time, something unique
> > per server an
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 11:29 +, Adrian Barker wrote:
> >> Nov 29 00:49:47 imap-e.ucl.ac.uk dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error]
> >> IMAP(ccaazzz): close() failed with index
> >> file /home/ccaazzz/imap-mail/.imap/mbox/dovecot.index: Stale NFS file
> >> handle
..
> Thanks for replying. I have read t
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 10:56 +, Ed W wrote:
> > dbox plans, could be implemented for v1.2:
> >
>
> Interesting to see this as production ready product. Could be very
> interesting if it adds performance and new features.
It should be production ready in v1.1 already. Or at least I don'
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 10:21 +, Adrian Barker wrote:
>> We recently moved all our users from the Washington IMAP server to
>> Dovecot. There has been a substantial improvement in performance, but
>> some users are reporting duplicate messages, and we see 'Stale NFS file
>>
Hi
My 2p
dbox plans, could be implemented for v1.2:
Interesting to see this as production ready product. Could be very
interesting if it adds performance and new features.
v2.0 master/config rewrite
--
It's mostly working already. One of the larger problems le
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 10:21 +, Adrian Barker wrote:
>
> We recently moved all our users from the Washington IMAP server to
> Dovecot. There has been a substantial improvement in performance, but
> some users are reporting duplicate messages, and we see 'Stale NFS file
> handle' errors in the s
We recently moved all our users from the Washington IMAP server to
Dovecot. There has been a substantial improvement in performance, but
some users are reporting duplicate messages, and we see 'Stale NFS file
handle' errors in the syslog. Does anyone know what would cause this ?
The errors relate
Timo Sirainen wrote:
v1.1.0 is finally getting closer, so it's time to start planning what
happens after it. Below is a list of some of the larger features I'm
planning on implementing. I'm not yet sure in which order, so I think
it's time to ask again what features companies would be willing to
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 21:08 +0100, Jost Krieger wrote:
> We have dropped dovecot in place of UW-IMAP for about 4 users
> and have solved our immediate problem: disk I/O overload, mainly
> from people doing POP3 and "leave mail on server". Thank you!
>
> Now i got loads of dovecot error message
We have dropped dovecot in place of UW-IMAP for about 4 users
and have solved our immediate problem: disk I/O overload, mainly
from people doing POP3 and "leave mail on server". Thank you!
Now i got loads of dovecot error messages in the logs and don't know
if there is any significance. Here a
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 23:05 -0600, Darren McLaughlin wrote:
> There's a ringing endorsement of Verio. They told me that the server
> had a"group mail file" and all the users had their mail stored
> together. If I installed Dovecot, they said it would split the
> mailboxes up into individual files
Hi Timo,
Dovecot was running on FC7 while the file server is running
on FC4.
- Joe
May the force be with you..
27 matches
Mail list logo
