Developers documents

Hi Apache devs, after asking some questions in the IRC channel I decided to add some notes to the docs/developer pages. I've attached a very small patch to this email generated from svn diff (as stated in https://httpd.apache.org/dev/patches.html) against the last commit of the trunk branch. I've

Re: Developers documents

+01:00 Luca Toscano : > Hi Apache devs, > > after asking some questions in the IRC channel I decided to add some notes > to the docs/developer pages. I've attached a very small patch to this email > generated from svn diff (as stated in > https://httpd.apache.org/dev/patches

Re: Developers documents

[adding also docs@] 2015-12-22 16:32 GMT+01:00 Luca Toscano : > Thanks Tom! Just filed the bug: > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58761 > > Luca > > 2015-12-22 15:25 GMT+01:00 Tom Fredrik Blenning Klaussen > : > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

Patches to review for httpd's doc

Hi Apache devs! If you have some spare time I'd be very happy to have your opinion about the integration of the following patches to trunk and 2.4.x (documentation only): https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57895 https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58761 https://bz.apache.or

MD5/SHA1 signatures for Apache Releases

Hi Apache devs! I am trying to contribute to the httpd project following up with some Documentation tasks in bz.apache.org, so please be patient with me if the question is trivial :) This bug is interesting: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55808 Would it make sense to remove MD5/S

Re: Translation ES es.xml

Hello Luis, I am updating the doc's xmls as well and I noticed a discrepancy between the EN documentation and the other locales too. It is really difficult to maintain a good documentation in english, keeping multiple languages in sync is even harder. My suggestion would be to file a bug in https:

Re: es_update

Hi Luis, the best way to track this change in my opinion is to open a bug using https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/ (File a bug => Apache httpd2 => Documentation). Thanks! Luca 2016-01-09 9:54 GMT-08:00 Luis Gil : > Hello: > I attached the svn diff named as 9-1-2016ES, i attach too the files i hav

Patches ready to review

Hi Apache devs! There are some patches waiting for a review, if you have any spare time to check them and let me know your thoughts it would be really great! Summary: - https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58744, clarification about strong pthread mutex support in core. - https://bz.ap

Re: Patches ready to review

Anybody? What do you think? Even a no would be fine :) Thanks! Luca Il 09 gen 2016 19:04, "Luca Toscano" ha scritto: > Hi Apache devs! > > There are some patches waiting for a review, if you have any spare time to > check them and let me know your thoughts it would be rea

Re: [Bug 55841] Misleading news items on bugfix releases ("This version of httpd is a major release of the [...]")

major improvements to > OCSP support, mod_lua, Dynamic Reverse Proxy configuration, Improved > Authentication/Authorization, FastCGI Proxy, New Expression Parser, and a > Small Object Caching API. > > n > > > On 13 Jan 2016, at 04:12, bugzi...@apache.org wrote: > >

Documentation patches to review

Hi Apache Devs! I would really appreciate some comments about the following patches: - *https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58305 * (how mod_cgi/mod_cgid sets environment variables + new comments in the code) - https://bz.apache.org

Re: [Bug 55841] Misleading news items on bugfix releases ("This version of httpd is a major release of the [...]")

gt; > On 29 Jan 2016, at 07:42, bugzi...@apache.org wrote: > > > > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55841 > > > > --- Comment #18 from Luca Toscano --- > > All right, I updated again http://httpd.staging.apache.org, I believe > that we > > should have th

Re: [RFC] Quoting arguments in examples (trunk vs 2.4)

2016-01-29 14:19 GMT+01:00 Eric Covener : > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 1:49 AM, Marion & Christophe JAILLET > wrote: > > Anyway, keeping the drift between the 2 is not a solution. It makes life > > harder when making some 'diff' or when merging changes > > > > > > Any thought? > > > [ x] quoting eve

Re: [Bug 55808] File integrity verification using MD5 and SHA1

Hi Yann, sorry for the lack of response but I didn't notice the patch. I checked the links in staging and published the patch to https://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi (hope that it is ok for you). Thanks Tom! Luca 2016-02-02 11:09 GMT+01:00 Yann Ylavic : > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 11:24 PM, Yan

Re: [Bug 55808] File integrity verification using MD5 and SHA1

2016-02-02 21:10 GMT+01:00 Tom Fredrik Blenning Klaussen : > > Having reviewed the changes I think they're good, but not complete. > The remaining http links should be changed to // . > Eg "http://httpd.apache.org/mod_ftp/"; should be changed to > "//httpd.apache.org/mod_ftp/" for all links contai

Proposal for a new mod_event documentation page

Hi Apache Devs! I started an email thread some days ago on the dev mailing list to gather information about mod_event, getting tons of interesting things to read. I attached to this email a draft of how the new page should look like in my opinion, please let me know your thoughts! Notes about the

Proposal for a new mod_event documentation page

+dev for visibility -- Messaggio inoltrato -- Da: "Luca Toscano" Data: 06 feb 2016 15:10 Oggetto: Proposal for a new mod_event documentation page A: Cc: Hi Apache Devs! I started an email thread some days ago on the dev mailing list to gather information about

Re: balancer-manager docs

Hi Jim, 2016-02-09 21:25 GMT+01:00 Jim Jagielski : > The more I think of it, a HowTo guide, like the ones we have > for public_html, Authn&Authz, etc regarding reverse proxy > makes the most sense... > > > On Feb 9, 2016, at 12:55 PM, Tim Bannister > wrote: > > > > On 9 Feb 2016, at 16:02, Raine

Re: Proposal for a new mod_event documentation page

GMT+01:00 Luca Toscano : > +dev for visibility > -- Messaggio inoltrato ------ > Da: "Luca Toscano" > Data: 06 feb 2016 15:10 > Oggetto: Proposal for a new mod_event documentation page > A: > Cc: > > Hi Apache Devs! > > I started an email t

Re: balancer-manager docs

2016-02-10 10:33 GMT+01:00 Stefan Eissing : > If you write one, I write one for http2! :-) > > +1+1+1+1 :)

Debugging build's validate-xml errors

Hello! I have added some s to the AsyncRequestWorkerFactor directive's usage section of mod_event but I am getting this error while running the build validate.xml step: ./build.sh validate-xml Buildfile: build.xml validate-xml: [xmlvalidate] $HOME/httpd-trunk/docs/manual/mod/event.xml:336:9: The

Re: Debugging build's validate-xml errors

Hi André, 2016-02-13 20:01 GMT+01:00 André Malo : > > > The docs have DTD files in the style directory. In this case that would be > modulesynopsis.dtd > > The content restriction basically means, only block elements are allowed > inside the usage element (any of those listed and unlimited times).

Pre-retirement banner on all the 2.2.x documentation pages

Hi Apache doc writers, I discussed in dev@ an idea to put the following banner on each documentation page of the 2.2 branch: Please note This document refers to the 2.2 version of Apache httpd that is still maintained but not actively developed. Please upgrade to the current

Re: Pre-retirement banner on all the 2.2.x documentation pages

Hi Eric! 2016-02-23 17:39 GMT+01:00 Eric Covener : > > I think the wording a sensitive subject and we should keep it as brief > as possible > > This document refers to our legacy release (2.2) The active release > (2.4) is documented . If you haven't already upgraded, read more > . > > Thanks f

Re: svn commit: r1732029 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual: ./ style/ style/lang/ style/xsl/

Hi André! 2016-02-24 11:44 GMT+01:00 André Malo : > > > Is there a reason why you reset the banner translations? > > I changed the banner's wording a bit for this use case. From (taking 2.0 one as reference): "This document refers to the 2.0 version of Apache httpd, which is no longer maintained.

Re: translating English to Japanese

Hi William, 2016-03-06 5:09 GMT+01:00 William A Rowe Jr : > > Welcome and TIA (thanks, in advance). > Welcome! > However the contributors/translators must personally review > all of the text, and turn the automated translation into "human > readable" text, accurately. > I have a more generic

Re: conflict trunk branch

Hi! 2016-03-16 4:55 GMT+01:00 William A Rowe Jr : > The general answer is 'svn revert' on the missing file, but this was more > complicated, it seems. > > Hopefully, all is well now? > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Lucien Gentis >>

Re: Updated ES Translation to actual head.

Hi Yann, 2016-03-29 22:36 GMT+02:00 Yann Ylavic : > > > Thanks Luis, looks good, committed in r1737042. > I couldn't find any reference to the reviewer, Sergio Ramos, in any > previous commit, is he already a contributor of the existing spanish > translation? > I think that we have a chicken/egg

Re: svn commit: r1737382 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/core.xml

Hi Eric and Rüdiger, 2016-04-01 15:59 GMT+02:00 Rüdiger Plüm : > > > On 04/01/2016 03:48 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > > I am -0.9 on this info in the manual, for a relatively low severity bug. > > +1. We don't do this kind of stuff in the documentation. This is what > CHANGES and Bugzilla are for. >

Re: svn commit: r1737382 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/core.xml

2016-04-01 16:32 GMT+02:00 Eric Covener : > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Luca Toscano > wrote: > > Yep I thought what was best too and decided to commit on trunk to gather > > some feedback. The Bug is low severity but as stated in users@ the > > documentation s

Re: Any one doing it?

2016-04-01 18:33 GMT+02:00 Yann Ylavic : > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Luis Gil > wrote: > > > > On 1 April 2016 at 17:50, Yann Ylavic wrote: > >> > >> So I would simply s/2.2/2.4/ to update the "recommended" version, but > >> the possibility to use another branch is already mentioned. > > >

Re: Frédéric Trégon commented on http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_macro.html

Hi! 2016-04-02 8:26 GMT+02:00 Marion & Christophe JAILLET < christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr>: > Hi, > > mod_macro states that: > ~~ > If you want to use a value within another string, it is useful to surround > the parameter in braces, to avoid confusion: > > > Docu

Re: Guide for Upgrade from 2.2 to 2.4: Need to mention default rule " Require all denied"

Hello! 2016-04-04 12:03 GMT+02:00 Hildegard Meier : > Hello, > > I have the following configuration in a vHost: > > [...] > > Alias /pnp4nagios "/usr/local/pnp4nagios-0.6.25/share" > > > AllowOverride None > > Order allow,deny > Allow from all > > [...] > > This works with Apache 2.2 but after u

Re: Re: Guide for Upgrade from 2.2 to 2.4: Need to mention default rule " Require all denied"

Hi again, 2016-04-04 16:19 GMT+02:00 Hildegard Meier : > > > > Solution is to replace the "Order allow,deny Allow from all" with > "Require all granted". > > > > I do not know, why the legacy directive has no effect in this case and I > suggest to give a hint on this case in the upgrade guide > >

Re: Re: Guide for Upgrade from 2.2 to 2.4: Need to mention default rule " Require all denied"

2016-04-04 19:35 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano : > Hi again, > > 2016-04-04 16:19 GMT+02:00 Hildegard Meier : > >> >> >> > Solution is to replace the "Order allow,deny Allow from all" with >> "Require all granted". >> > >> >

Re: Re: Re: Guide for Upgrade from 2.2 to 2.4: Need to mention default rule " Require all denied"

Hi! 2016-04-05 14:00 GMT+02:00 Hildegard Meier : > Thanks, > > that is correct, it was absoluteley not clear to me that having the module > "access_compat" enabled and mixing old and new style would be absoluteley > not supported. > Sorry to jump in again but this is not true in my opinion. As s

Re: Aw: Re: Re: Guide for Upgrade from 2.2 to 2.4: Need to mention default rule " Require all denied"

2016-04-06 0:00 GMT+02:00 Rich Bowen : > I haven't gotten around to fixing yet, but I (or someone) will annotate > accordingly. > I created a patch for the "upgrading" section containing examples and suggestions, let me know your thoughts (also from Hildegard Meier would be great). I haven't just

Re: Aw: Re: Re: Guide for Upgrade from 2.2 to 2.4: Need to mention default rule " Require all denied"

2016-04-07 10:57 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano : > > > 2016-04-06 0:00 GMT+02:00 Rich Bowen : > >> I haven't gotten around to fixing yet, but I (or someone) will annotate >> accordingly. >> > > I created a patch for the "upgrading" section containing ex

Re: Aw: Re: Re: Guide for Upgrade from 2.2 to 2.4: Need to mention default rule " Require all denied"

2016-04-08 19:37 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano : > > > 2016-04-07 10:57 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano : > >> >> >> 2016-04-06 0:00 GMT+02:00 Rich Bowen : >> >>> I haven't gotten around to fixing yet, but I (or someone) will annotate >>> according

Proposal: add a permanent "Bugfix checklist" section to all manual pages

Hi docs@! I have been thinking a way to inform users about our best practices when finding inconsistencies in the docs, namely checking CHANGES and Bugzilla first. Most of the times occasional users (or even experienced ones) tend to forget where the changelog is, if httpd uses bugzilla or not, et

Re: Proposal: add a permanent "Bugfix checklist" section to all manual pages

Hi André, Thanks for the feedback! 2016-04-12 14:53 GMT+02:00 André Malo : > Hi Luca, > > * Luca Toscano wrote: > > > Hi docs@! > > > > I have been thinking a way to inform users about our best practices when > > finding inconsistencies in the docs,

Re: Proposal: add a permanent "Bugfix checklist" section to all manual pages

Hi Christophe, thanks for the feedback! 2016-04-12 18:57 GMT+02:00 Christophe JAILLET : > Hi, > > I don't think it would be the right place for that. > When I'm looking for some doc, I'm not looking for changelog or bug > reports. > I expect the doc to be up-to-date and to have compatibility not

Re: [Bug 59316] New: Broken links in HTML manual

2016-04-14 14:58 GMT+02:00 Rich Bowen : > > > On 04/13/2016 09:07 AM, bugzi...@apache.org wrote: > >> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316 >> >> Bug ID: 59316 >> Summary: Broken links in HTML manual >> Product: Apache httpd-2 >> Vers

Re: Proposal: add a permanent "Bugfix checklist" section to all manual pages

2016-04-12 11:38 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano : > Hi docs@! > > I have been thinking a way to inform users about our best practices when > finding inconsistencies in the docs, namely checking CHANGES and Bugzilla > first. Most of the times occasional users (or even experienced ones) t

Re: Proposal: add a permanent "Bugfix checklist" section to all manual pages

2016-04-18 21:46 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano : > > > 2016-04-12 11:38 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano : > >> Hi docs@! >> >> I have been thinking a way to inform users about our best practices when >> finding inconsistencies in the docs, namely checking CHANGES and

Re: Proposal: add a permanent "Bugfix checklist" section to all manual pages

+docs@ 2016-04-20 23:25 GMT+02:00 Marion & Christophe JAILLET < christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr>: > Le 20/04/2016 19:37, Luca Toscano a écrit : > > > > 2016-04-18 21:46 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano : > >> >> >> 2016-04-12 11:38 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano

Re: Proposal: add a permanent "Bugfix checklist" section to all manual pages

2016-04-22 8:19 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano : > +docs@ > > 2016-04-20 23:25 GMT+02:00 Marion & Christophe JAILLET < > christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr>: > >> Le 20/04/2016 19:37, Luca Toscano a écrit : >> >> >> >> 2016-04-18 21:46 GMT+02:00 Luca T

Re: Proposal: add a permanent "Bugfix checklist" section to all manual pages

2016-04-25 21:23 GMT+02:00 Christophe JAILLET : > Le 24/04/2016 à 23:18, Luca Toscano a écrit : > > > New version just committed, examples: > > https://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/mod/mod_lua.html > https://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/mod/event.html > > Luca > &g

Re: Proposal: add a permanent "Bugfix checklist" section to all manual pages

sed, or could be addressed. >> >> Thanks, >> >> On 04/24/2016 05:18 PM, Luca Toscano wrote: >> >>> New version just committed, examples: >>> >>> https://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/mod/mod_lua.html >>> https://httpd.apache.org/docs/tru

Re: svn commit: r1740987 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/style: latex/quickreference.xsl latex/synopsis.xsl xsl/quickreference.xsl xsl/synopsis.xsl

Hi Yann, 2016-04-26 12:07 GMT+02:00 Yann Ylavic : > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Yann Ylavic > wrote: > > [CC docs@] > > > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Yann Ylavic > wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:47 AM, wrote: > >>> Author: ylavic > >>> Date: Tue Apr 26 09:47:46 2016 > >>

Re: Proposal: add a permanent "Bugfix checklist" section to all manual pages

2016-04-26 10:08 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano : > > > 2016-04-26 9:08 GMT+02:00 Lucien Gentis : > > >> --- In mod_lua, "Comments" appears as an item of "Bugfix checklist", but >> in event, it appears as an item of "See also" > > > Ver

Re: Proposal: add a permanent "Bugfix checklist" section to all manual pages

2016-04-27 14:49 GMT+02:00 Eric Covener : > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 7:43 AM, Lucien Gentis > wrote: > > I think of something like "Comments about this doc", since these are only > > comments about the doc. > > Doc Feedback? I think space is at a premium in that sidebar. > > One solution could be

Re: Proposal: add a permanent "Bugfix checklist" section to all manual pages

nts that is often not considered :( > > Le 28/04/2016 à 20:52, Christophe JAILLET a écrit : > > Le 28/04/2016 à 09:44, Luca Toscano a écrit : > > > > 2016-04-27 14:49 GMT+02:00 Eric Covener : > >> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 7:43 AM, Lucien Gentis >> wrote: >> &

Re: Proposal: add a permanent "Bugfix checklist" section to all manual pages

2016-05-10 7:16 GMT+02:00 Christophe JAILLET : > > But (not directly related), in the same frame, under "Directives", some >> directive names are between < and > and some are not. >> See for example >> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/en/mod/mod_authz_core.html >> >> I looked at corresponding XML

Re: Fwd: Broken link on Apache.org

[re-arranged email thread] 2016-05-13 23:46 GMT+02:00 Rich Bowen : > > On May 12, 2016 7:44 PM, "Eric Covener" wrote: > >> -- Forwarded message -- >> From: David Nalley >> Date: Thu, May 12, 2016 at 7:40 PM >> Subject: Re: Broken link on Apache.org >> To: Jerry Lucas , d...@http

Re: Task #85e57cec: Improve the Request Processing guide

+docs@ Hi! 2016-05-18 20:49 GMT+02:00 Onder SEZGIN : > Hi, > > I would like to contribute to the task. > Any guidance how i can do that is appreciated. > I would start from https://httpd.apache.org/docs-project/, that contains all the basic info to make a change to the httpd documentation. Then

Re: Translations (IRC conversation)

[Reporting a discussion happened on IRC] 2016-10-19 15:24 GMT+02:00 Rich Bowen : > > > * We have translations that are grossly out of date. We should drop > them. It remains only to define what "tool old" means? If a translation > hasn't been touched since 2.4.0, I would recommend dropping it. Dis

Re: Translations (IRC conversation)

2016-10-20 21:46 GMT+02:00 Mads Toftum : > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 09:36:51PM +0200, André Malo wrote: > > * Rich Bowen wrote: > > > * We have translations that are grossly out of date. We should drop > > > them. It remains only to define what "tool old" means? If a translation > > > hasn't been t

Re: Translations (IRC conversation)

2016-10-23 12:55 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano : > > > 2016-10-20 21:46 GMT+02:00 Mads Toftum : > >> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 09:36:51PM +0200, André Malo wrote: >> > * Rich Bowen wrote: >> > > * We have translations that are grossly out of date. We should drop >

Re: Translations (IRC conversation)

2016-11-15 23:22 GMT+01:00 André Malo : > * Luca Toscano wrote: > > > 2016-10-23 12:55 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano : > > > 2016-10-20 21:46 GMT+02:00 Mads Toftum : > > >> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 09:36:51PM +0200, André Malo wrote: > > >> > * Rich Bowen w

Re: Translations (IRC conversation)

Hi Vincent, 2016-11-18 14:41 GMT+01:00 Vincent Deffontaines : > Hi, > > Lucien and I have discussed off-list, regarding the 2.4 .fr doc > translation. > Lucien has provided an impressive work of .fr translation during the last > monthes+years, which is only lacking review. > We have many 2.4 .fr

Re: Translations (IRC conversation)

2016-11-29 18:20 GMT+01:00 André Malo : > * Rich Bowen wrote: > > > On 11/20/2016 05:20 AM, Luca Toscano wrote: > > > My view from takashi's status: > > > > > > 1) da, de, pt-b, ru, ko and zh-cn should be put in a holding area and > > > not

Re: [patch] [2.4] typo: deperecated to deprecated

Hi Sébastien, fixed it in svn.apache.org/r1776711 and http://svn.apache.org/r1776712. I ran "aspell" against the whole file and found other typos, thanks a lot for the report! Luca 2016-12-31 3:46 GMT+01:00 Sébastien Santoro : > Hi, > > Please find in attachment a patch to fix a typo. > > Conce

Re: small fix in the http2 h2push section

Hi Lajos, 2017-01-02 0:27 GMT+01:00 Lajos Veres : > Hi, > > I think I have found a small copy-paste(?) issue in the above section. > Plese find attached a fix. > > Thanks a lot for following up with us. After reviewing your patch I'd take a more radical approach, namely removing the "This should

Re: small fix in the http2 h2push section

2017-01-02 9:00 GMT+01:00 Luca Toscano : > Hi Lajos, > > 2017-01-02 0:27 GMT+01:00 Lajos Veres : > >> Hi, >> >> I think I have found a small copy-paste(?) issue in the above section. >> Plese find attached a fix. >> >> > Thanks a lot for follow

Re: httpd on Twitter

Hi Rich, 2017-01-05 8:31 GMT-08:00 Rich Bowen : > As you might know, we have a Twitter account - > https://twitter.com/apache_httpd > > I believe, at the moment, it's just me and Jim that have the keys to > this, and it's mostly a ghost town. We announce releases there, and > occasionally respond

Re: httpd on Twitter

Hi William, 2017-01-11 12:20 GMT-08:00 William A Rowe Jr : > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Luca Toscano > wrote: > > > > 2017-01-05 8:31 GMT-08:00 Rich Bowen : > >> > >> I would like for us to do more with Twitter to get the word out that > >> we&

Re: http2 howto

Hello Lucien, 2017-01-22 13:39 GMT+01:00 Lucien Gentis : > Hello again, > > 2.4 branch : http2 howto has been ported from trunk, but there's no link > to it in http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/ > > trunk : http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/ presents an howtos index and > its content below ; http

Re: mod_ssl.xml

Hello Lucien, 2017-04-08 17:38 GMT+02:00 Lucien Gentis : > Hello again, > > 2.4 branch - mod_ssl.xml file : SSLOCSPNoverify and > SSLOCSPResponderCertificateFile directives refers to > httpd 2.5 > > I can see both of them in the fr translation but not in https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/en/mod/

Re: mod_remoteip.xml

Hello Lucien, 2017-04-08 17:28 GMT+02:00 Lucien Gentis : > Hello, > > Trunk branch : mod_remoteip.xml file, > RemoteIPProxyProtocolExceptions > directive : > > " > The RemoteIPProxyProtocol directive > enables or" > > must probably be replaced by : > > " > The RemoteIPProxyProtocolExce

Re: mod_remoteip.xml

2017-04-23 17:16 GMT+02:00 Lucien Gentis : > > > Le 14/04/2017 à 15:26, Lucien Gentis a écrit : > > Hello Luca, > > Apologize for not answering. > > I come back next week > > Lucien > > Le 10/04/2017 à 19:20, Luca Toscano a écrit : > > Hello Lucien,

Re: PGP Verification

Hi Nick, 2017-04-30 1:23 GMT+02:00 Nick Kew : > I've made some updates to our PGP verification page. > They can be seen at > http://httpd.staging.apache.org/dev/verification.html > > The reasons for updating it is that the old instructions > had become dangerously outdated, by virtue of using > 3

Re: mod_remoteip.xml

2017-04-27 13:10 GMT+02:00 Lucien Gentis : > > > Le 27/04/2017 à 10:57, Luca Toscano a écrit : > > > > 2017-04-23 17:16 GMT+02:00 Lucien Gentis : > >> >> >> Le 14/04/2017 à 15:26, Lucien Gentis a écrit : >> >> Hello Luca, >> >> Apo

Re: svn commit: r1795906 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ CHANGES STATUS server/request.c

httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/CHANGES >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/CHAN >> GES?rev=1795906&r1=1795905&r2=1795906&view=diff >> ======== >> == >> --- httpd/htt

mod_md documentation in trunk

Hi everybody, as you probably know Stefan added the first implementation of mod_md in trunk plus some documentation. I tried to build it and got rid of some errors with http://home.apache.org/~elukey/httpd-trunk-mod_md-doc_fix.patch but then I can still see the following after running build.sh val

Re: mod_md documentation in trunk

Hi again :) 2017-08-11 18:06 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano : > Hi everybody, > > as you probably know Stefan added the first implementation of mod_md in > trunk plus some documentation. I tried to build it and got rid of some > errors with http://home.apache.org/~elukey/httpd-tr

Re: mod_md documentation in trunk

2017-08-13 23:11 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano : > Hi again :) > > 2017-08-11 18:06 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano : > >> Hi everybody, >> >> as you probably know Stefan added the first implementation of mod_md in >> trunk plus some documentation. I tried to build it and

Re: mod_md documentation in trunk

2017-08-16 16:16 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano : > > > 2017-08-13 23:11 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano : > >> Hi again :) >> >> 2017-08-11 18:06 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano : >> >>> Hi everybody, >>> >>> as you probably know Stefan added the first i

Re: svn commit: r1805630 [1/30] - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual: ./ mod/

Hi Christophe, You are definitely right and i think that the root cause is this commit: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1805189&view=rev I have probably not understood correctly the side effects to translations, apologies for the issue. I will definitely work on it in a week, i am distant from

Re: svn commit: r1805630 [1/30] - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual: ./ mod/

g for a solution, will try to solve this problem asap. Sorry for the trouble to all the translators :) Luca 2017-08-21 22:46 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano : > Hi Christophe, > > You are definitely right and i think that the root cause is this commit: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?

Re: svn commit: r1805630 [1/30] - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual: ./ mod/

Proposed a fix for the XSL code in r1806443 and rebuilt the french translations with r1806444. Everything seems back to normal but please let me know if you see anything weird going on. Luca 2017-08-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano : > Back from holidays! > > I can confirm that r18051

Directives highlight in docs

Hi everybody, I noticed that some directives like the mod_md ones are not highlighted in the example blocks. For example, the summary of https://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/mod/mod_md.html correctly renders DocumentRoot, ServerName and SSLEngine but not ManagedDomain (at least on my browser). The

Re: Directives highlight in docs

s a new module/directive/thingy we need to > update that and regenerate. > > On 09/10/2017 03:37 AM, Luca Toscano wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > > > I noticed that some directives like the mod_md ones are not highlighted > > in the example blocks. For example, the summary &

Re: thumbs commented on http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/mod/mod_ssl.html

Hi Lucien, the current branch is 2.4 :) I bet that Stefan wanted to release SSLPolicy for 2.4.28 and forgot to update the docs references afterwards (that is understandable). These issues happens from time to time in the trunk docs, and are usually fixed during the 2.4 backport. Luca 2017-11-24

Re: svn commit: r1819994 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/style/xsl/common.xsl

Hi everybody! 2018-01-03 19:24 GMT+01:00 : > Author: elukey > Date: Wed Jan 3 18:24:57 2018 > New Revision: 1819994 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1819994&view=rev > Log: > common.xsl: update year to 2018 in the footer > > Modified: > httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/style/xsl/common

Re: svn commit: r1819994 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/style/xsl/common.xsl

2018-01-03 19:35 GMT+01:00 Luca Toscano : > Hi everybody! > > 2018-01-03 19:24 GMT+01:00 : > >> Author: elukey >> Date: Wed Jan 3 18:24:57 2018 >> New Revision: 1819994 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1819994&view=rev >> L

Re: svn commit: r1819994 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/style/xsl/common.xsl

Hi everybody, 2018-01-06 12:43 GMT+01:00 Rainer Jung : > Am 05.01.2018 um 20:34 schrieb Ruediger Pluem: > >> >> >> On 01/05/2018 07:29 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> >>> Not sure 18mons after EOL whether we want to declare httpd 2.2 docs >>> "closed/archived" much like 1.3 and 2.0, in which >>>

Re: svn commit: r1819994 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/style/xsl/common.xsl

ragraph change, and rebuild. > > > > On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 8:23 AM, Luca Toscano > wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > > > 2018-01-06 12:43 GMT+01:00 Rainer Jung : > >> > >> Am 05.01.2018 um 20:34 schrieb Ruediger Pluem: > >>> > >>> > &

Re: svn commit: r1826414 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/docs/manual/mod: mod_proxy.xml.fr mod_proxy_uwsgi.html mod_remoteip.xml.fr mod_ssl.xml.fr

Hi Lucien, 2018-03-10 17:10 GMT+01:00 : > Author: lgentis > Date: Sat Mar 10 16:10:45 2018 > New Revision: 1826414 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1826414&view=rev > Log: > XML updates. > > Removed: > httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy_uwsgi.html > Was it intended

Re: r1828598 and r1828599: tool to ease syntax highlight upgrade in prettify.js

2018-04-07 19:45 GMT+02:00 Christophe Jaillet : > Le 07/04/2018 à 19:00, Christophe Jaillet a écrit : > >> Hi, >> keeping up to date directives lists for syntax highlight in prettify.js >> can be tricky. >> >> I've tried to ease the process. >> The 2 commits in the subject line add a way to genera

Re: Issue building the doc with openjdk 9

Hi Christophe, 2018-04-20 7:17 GMT+02:00 Christophe Jaillet : > Le 20/04/2018 à 07:14, Marion et Christophe JAILLET a écrit : > >> Hi, >> >> I've recently upgraded to the Ubuntu 18.04 Beta. >> >> In the process, openjdk 9 has been installed and/or the default openjdk >> in my setup has moved fro

Re: Issue building the doc with openjdk 9

2018-04-20 22:24 GMT+02:00 André Malo : > * Luca Toscano wrote: > > > 2018-04-20 7:17 GMT+02:00 Christophe Jaillet > > > > > > >> -Xbootclasspath/p is no longer a supported option. > > >> Error: Could not create the Java Virtual Machine.

Re: svn commit: r1835761 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/core.xml

Hi! 2018-07-12 20:50 GMT+02:00 : > Author: jailletc36 > Date: Thu Jul 12 18:50:24 2018 > New Revision: 1835761 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1835761&view=rev > Log: > Explain the limitation of with a filename with surrounding quotes > in 2.4.34. > > Modified: > httpd/httpd/trunk/

Re: svn commit: r1841620 - /httpd/site/trunk/content/dev/verification.mdtext

Hi William, can you write in here the full command to use? Didn't find the -r flag that you mentioned :( Thanks! Luca Il giorno ven 21 set 2018 alle ore 14:30 William A Rowe Jr ha scritto: > > You might want to point out the -r flag to OpenSSL, which emits the same > output as bintools sha256.

Re: svn commit: r1841620 - /httpd/site/trunk/content/dev/verification.mdtext

Hi Rainer, Il giorno sab 22 set 2018 alle ore 05:45 Rainer Jung ha scritto: > > Hi Luca, > > Am 21.09.2018 um 23:47 schrieb Luca Toscano: > > Hi William, > > > > can you write in here the full command to use? Didn't find the -r flag > > that you mention

Re: mod_ssl.xml rev 1841573 2.4 branch

Bonjour Lucien, Il giorno sab 22 set 2018 alle ore 08:29 Lucien Gentis ha scritto: > > Bonjour everybody, > > In mod_ssl.xml rev 1841573 - 2.4 branch - following lines were added : > > +TLSv1.3 (when using OpenSSL 1.1.1 and later) > + > +A new version of the TLS protocol, as defined in >

Re: [VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

Il giorno mar 2 ott 2018 alle ore 15:55 Rainer Jung ha scritto: > > Am 29.09.2018 um 09:03 schrieb Christophe JAILLET: > > Do we need to change something? > > == > > [ ] this mail is too long, do whatever you want, I just want something > > that works > > [ ] no. I can

trailing whitespaces removed by r1673947 only in trunk

Hi everybody, while trying to merge r1844401 in 2.4.x I noticed some conflicts, that as far as I can tell are coming from r1673947. It seems a big and old change that was never backported, but it mixes xml and transformations (that it is not ideal). What is the best way forward? A quick solution,

Re: trailing whitespaces removed by r1673947 only in trunk

Hi William, Il giorno dom 21 ott 2018 alle ore 16:55 William A Rowe Jr ha scritto: > > On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 3:52 AM Luca Toscano wrote: >> >> Hi everybody, >> >> while trying to merge r1844401 in 2.4.x I noticed some conflicts, that >> as far as I can tel

Re: trailing whitespaces removed by r1673947 only in trunk

Hi Christophe, Il giorno dom 21 ott 2018 alle ore 11:35 Christophe JAILLET ha scritto: > > Le 21/10/2018 à 10:52, Luca Toscano a écrit : > > Hi everybody, > > > > while trying to merge r1844401 in 2.4.x I noticed some conflicts, that > > as far as I can tell are co

  1   2   >