2016-04-01 18:33 GMT+02:00 Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com>: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Luis Gil <ljgbpfeif...@googlemail.com> > wrote: > > > > On 1 April 2016 at 17:50, Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> So I would simply s/2.2/2.4/ to update the "recommended" version, but > >> the possibility to use another branch is already mentioned. > > > > So better put 2.2/2.4? or just the 2.4 since 2.2 its not maintained? > > 2.4 alone is enough IMHO, though 2.2 may still be maintained ;)
+1, let's concentrate on 2.4 :) Luca
