Re: svn commit: r1737382 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/core.xml

I am -0.9 on this info in the manual, for a relatively low severity bug. On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 9:31 AM, wrote: > Author: elukey > Date: Fri Apr 1 13:31:28 2016 > New Revision: 1737382 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1737382&view=rev > Log: > Added warning for AllowOverrideList None i

Re: svn commit: r1737382 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/core.xml

On 04/01/2016 03:48 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > I am -0.9 on this info in the manual, for a relatively low severity bug. +1. We don't do this kind of stuff in the documentation. This is what CHANGES and Bugzilla are for. Regards Rüdiger > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 9:31 AM, wrote: >> Author

Re: svn commit: r1737382 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/core.xml

Hi Eric and Rüdiger, 2016-04-01 15:59 GMT+02:00 Rüdiger Plüm : > > > On 04/01/2016 03:48 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > > I am -0.9 on this info in the manual, for a relatively low severity bug. > > +1. We don't do this kind of stuff in the documentation. This is what > CHANGES and Bugzilla are for. >

Re: svn commit: r1737382 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/core.xml

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Luca Toscano wrote: > Yep I thought what was best too and decided to commit on trunk to gather > some feedback. The Bug is low severity but as stated in users@ the > documentation says X and httpd does the opposite, getting people confused. > IMHO we should adverti

Re: svn commit: r1737382 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/core.xml

2016-04-01 16:32 GMT+02:00 Eric Covener : > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Luca Toscano > wrote: > > Yep I thought what was best too and decided to commit on trunk to gather > > some feedback. The Bug is low severity but as stated in users@ the > > documentation says X and httpd does the opposi

Re: Any one doing it?

Hello all: I am modifying the docsformat.mdtext and I have added several things, but before sending it to the @docs list, I would like to solve some questions that I´ve got about it: 1. In the actual transformation section, its says about the SVN 2.2.x docs, does that svn is the same as the

Re: Any one doing it?

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Luis Gil wrote: > > In the actual transformation section, its says about the SVN 2.2.x docs, > does that svn is the same as the trunk branch? No, there is a docs/ directory for every branch (trunk, 2.4, 2.x, ...) The section says: "Assuming you already have [httpd

Re: Any one doing it?

On 1 April 2016 at 17:50, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Luis Gil > wrote: > > > > In the actual transformation section, its says about the SVN 2.2.x docs, > > does that svn is the same as the trunk branch? > > No, there is a docs/ directory for every branch (trunk, 2.4, 2.

Re: Any one doing it?

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Luis Gil wrote: > > On 1 April 2016 at 17:50, Yann Ylavic wrote: >> >> So I would simply s/2.2/2.4/ to update the "recommended" version, but >> the possibility to use another branch is already mentioned. > > So better put 2.2/2.4? or just the 2.4 since 2.2 its not

Re: Any one doing it?

2016-04-01 18:33 GMT+02:00 Yann Ylavic : > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Luis Gil > wrote: > > > > On 1 April 2016 at 17:50, Yann Ylavic wrote: > >> > >> So I would simply s/2.2/2.4/ to update the "recommended" version, but > >> the possibility to use another branch is already mentioned. > > >

Re: Any one doing it?

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Luca Toscano wrote: > > +1, let's concentrate on 2.4 :) You know, there is still many 2.2 around, and some people may have backported 2.4 fixes to 2.2 and decide to propose them some days. If three PMC members (at least) think a 2.2.32 is worth it, it may well be o

Re: Any one doing it?

Linkedin: https://linkd.in/Ljjt8L Twitter : https://twitter.com/luigy_tspg On 1 April 2016 at 18:49, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Luca Toscano > wrote: > > > > +1, let's concentrate on 2.4 :) > > You know, there is still many 2.2 around, an

Re: Any one doing it?

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Luca Toscano > wrote: > > > > +1, let's concentrate on 2.4 :) > > You know, there is still many 2.2 around, and some people may have > backported 2.4 fixes to 2.2 and decide to propose them some days. > If thre

Re: Frédéric Trégon commented on http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_macro.html

Hi, mod_macro states that: ~~ If you want to use a value within another string, it is useful to surround the parameter in braces, to avoid confusion: DocumentRoot "/var/www/${docroot}/htdocs" ~~ As written in the comment below, it