On 1 April 2016 at 17:50, Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Luis Gil <ljgbpfeif...@googlemail.com> > wrote: > > > > In the actual transformation section, its says about the SVN 2.2.x docs, > > does that svn is the same as the trunk branch? > > No, there is a docs/ directory for every branch (trunk, 2.4, 2.x, > <unmaintained>...) > > The section says: > "Assuming you already have > [httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/]( > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/) > (or the equivalent from another branch) checked out from SVN, ..." > > So I would simply s/2.2/2.4/ to update the "recommended" version, but > the possibility to use another branch is already mentioned. >
So better put 2.2/2.4? or just the 2.4 since 2.2 its not maintained? > > > It says there that you can get Java from SUN... I had added a link to the > > Oracle page > > http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/index.html would > > that be good? > > Maybe just s/SUN/Oracle/ would be enough, links die. > cool > > No idea for last point (perl failures).. > > Regards, > Yann. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org > > Thank you for the feedback Luis
