ively have always done an equivalent to "happy
eyeballs", so the risk is low.
There are exceptions: ipv6.bell.ca is one.
--
Michael Richardson. o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signa
Geoff Huston wrote:
>> On 17 Oct 2022, at 7:53 am, Michael Richardson
wrote:
>> I think that's because
>> recursive nameserves effectively have always done an equivalent to "happy
>> eyeballs", so the risk is low.
> That
What a great document.
I would like more WGs to do this kind of thing regularly.
--
Michael Richardson , Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https
? forbidden?
tolerated?
--
Michael Richardson. o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman
can do to make those who need just a bit of IPv4 (one or two
addresses) easier, while encouraging IPv6-first, is a good thing to me.
Your comments much appreciated.
--
Michael Richardson. o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
sig
Havard Eidnes wrote:
>> Hi, while editing draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation, it
occured
>> to me that the automatic reverse that
>> draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options could enable
>> better/simpler RFC2317 delegation for IPv4 subnets.
>>
>> My
.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-richardson-homenet-secret-gardens-01
but, MIF shutdown before I could take it anywhere.
--
Michael Richardson. o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Descript
en probably you should
object to RFC8499bis keeping it.
--
Michael Richardson. o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP
Michael Richardson wrote:
> definition which was objected to by multiple IESG members.
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-integrations/ballot/
> (in RFC-editor Q, on missref)
> So, if you didn't like that definition before, then probably you sh
cific terminology for such a use of nn DNS Authorittive Server in a
> draft/doc anywhere, but i still think it is worth the effort to have a
> specific term for that.
--
Michael Richardson , Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signatu
On 2021-01-18 4:27 p.m., John Levine wrote:
They think DoH is swell, but not when it bypasses security controls
and leaks info to random outside people
Sage advice.
In the OPSAWG where RFC8520 (MUD) currently lives, we are trying to
codify advice to to IoT manufacturers about these things.
pl
vice.
--Ben
[1]
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-01.txt
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--- End Message ---
--
Michael Richardson. o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
S
m looking for a good well reviewed reference to use rather than repeating
this again.
--
Michael Richardson. o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
DNS
r maybe both, your choice,”
> so the then-chairs decided the document wasn’t worth sending through
> publication.
Oh. That's why I don't want to attempt writing this myself.
So, that's not encouraging.
--
Michael Richardson. o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
) to outsource the naming service to the Outsourcing
Infrastructure.
--
Michael Richardson , Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
) to outsource the naming service to the Outsourcing
Infrastructure.
--
Michael Richardson , Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
limitations that we might be unaware
of. This in particular relates to the questions at:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/VcXftoB30feY9PlsPtvEV65JycM
--
Michael Richardson , Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
yone to take a calming breath and understand that I am
> taking a very pragmatic view of this concern.
Thank you!
--
Michael Richardson , Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
s the
wireless rather than the WEP that was common at the time.
--
Michael Richardson , Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
pgpkyKKVWU2ud.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
Markus Stenberg wrote:
> On 23.11.2014, at 23.14, Michael Richardson
> wrote:
>> I have read: Automated Delegation of IP6.ARPA reverse zones with
>> Prefix Delegation draft-andrews-dnsop-pd-reverse-02
>>
>> as a method to delegate rever
20 matches
Mail list logo
