Markus Stenberg <markus.stenb...@iki.fi> wrote:
> On 23.11.2014, at 23.14, Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>
> wrote:
>> I have read: Automated Delegation of IP6.ARPA reverse zones with
>> Prefix Delegation draft-andrews-dnsop-pd-reverse-02
>>
>> as a method to delegate reverse zones to CPE devices as the prefix is
>> delegated. I find the method entirely sensible, and I think highly
>> secure. I don't know if this belongs in dnsop or in homenet (or
>> dhcpv6, since a new DHCPv6 option is requested, and this enhances
>> DHCPv6-PD): I'll let the INT and Ops ADs sort that out.
> Is this actually desired by the operators? At least here (.fi), ISPs
I don't care what they want: I want it as a customer.
At this point, one can not originate email from IPv6 addresses without
working reverse names.
I don't care if some operators do not want to deploy, and I don't care if
some customers can't be bothered to setup or or own their reverse map.
Nobody is forcing anyone to do this; (or to run IPv6).
But, if someone wants to delegate the reverse (and I know many operators who
do), this seems like the right way to do it.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
pgpRczj8wNZ8g.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
