Joe Abley <jab...@hopcount.ca> wrote:
> My feeling is that it's far more common to find dual-stack nameservers
> reachable directly by v6-only and v4-only clients than it is to find
> services that the requested names refer to that are dual-stack and
> similarly reachable. On the face of it this seems like the opposite
> assumption than the one you describe above.
I would say the same thing.
DNS operators (whether outsourced or on-prem), seem way more proactive about
v6 support than other parts of organizations. I think that's because
recursive nameserves effectively have always done an equivalent to "happy
eyeballs", so the risk is low.
There are exceptions: ipv6.bell.ca is one.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
