Alright, some time on my plate ...
On Wed, 4 Apr 2012, Joe Abley wrote:
On 2012-04-04, at 08:20, William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote:
It seems that after delivering my presentation on subsequent AS112
delegations in Quebec City, I hadn't recalled what the group thought about
adopting t
+1.
I think a cleaner, simpler coordination framework for how to get things added
AND REMOVED from AS112 makes a lot of sense.
I say removed, because at least some discussion has revolved around people
wanting domains on there that others believe they have future use of. So
de-delegation from
On Apr 4, 2012, at 8:41 AM, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> On 2012-04-04, at 08:20, William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote:
>
>> It seems that after delivering my presentation on subsequent AS112
>> delegations in Quebec City, I hadn't recalled what the group thought about
>> adopting this work as a dns
On 2012-04-04 5:05 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
> Joe Abley wrote:
>> On 2012-04-04, at 11:31, Tony Finch wrote:
>>
>>> I think BIND treats NXDOMAIN replies with the wrong authority as a
>>> FORMERR. Domainers are returning positive replies which BIND does not
>>> subject to a SOA sanity check.
>> [real
Joe Abley wrote:
> On 2012-04-04, at 11:31, Tony Finch wrote:
>
> > I think BIND treats NXDOMAIN replies with the wrong authority as a
> > FORMERR. Domainers are returning positive replies which BIND does not
> > subject to a SOA sanity check.
>
> [real test]
> All other nameservers gave a prompt
On 2012-04-04, at 11:31, Tony Finch wrote:
> I think BIND treats NXDOMAIN replies with the wrong authority as a
> FORMERR. Domainers are returning positive replies which BIND does not
> subject to a SOA sanity check.
monster.hopcount.ca is serving the fake (empty apart from apex SOA/NS and glue)
Joe Abley wrote:
>
> the add/drop problem is a lot simpler if every AS112 node hosts the zone
>
> $ORIGIN .
> @ SOA ...
> NS something
> NS sensible
>
> and answers authoritatively on the addresses corresponding to
> "something" and "sensible", returning NXDOMAIN for everything in the
On 2012-04-04 12:20 PM, William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote:
>
> It seems that after delivering my presentation on subsequent AS112
> delegations in Quebec City, I hadn't recalled what the group thought
> about adopting this work as a dnsop item. So, I'm soliciting feedback
> on this request. I have
On 2012-04-04, at 08:20, William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote:
> It seems that after delivering my presentation on subsequent AS112
> delegations in Quebec City, I hadn't recalled what the group thought about
> adopting this work as a dnsop item. So, I'm soliciting feedback on this
> request
