[DNSOP]Re: Second (short) WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion

2024-05-17 Thread Suzanne Woolf
Colleagues, The new WGLC on draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion is now closed. The authors have incorporated all the revisions requested by our AD and the WG, and we see consensus to advance it for publication. Thanks all for your feedback and patience. Suzanne (for the chairs) On May 7, 2024, at 1

[DNSOP]Re: Second (short) WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion

2024-05-14 Thread Donald Eastlake
Hi, Thanks for resolving my comments. Donald === Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA d3e...@gmail.com On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 4:10 PM Wessels, Duane wrote: > Hi Donald, > > Thanks for the suggestions. We’v

[DNSOP]Re: Second (short) WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion

2024-05-14 Thread Wessels, Duane
Hi Donald, Thanks for the suggestions. We’ve implemented all your suggested changes in the source document. We’ll wait a few days for any more changes and then publish a new revision. DW > On May 12, 2024, at 1:30 AM, Donald Eastlake wrote: > > Caution: This email originated from outside

[DNSOP]Re: Second (short) WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion

2024-05-11 Thread Donald Eastlake
Hi, I support this draft but have the following comments: I would assume this has been discussed before but, presumably, the purpose of this document is to see that the zoneversion option will interoperate between different implementations. So, why isn't it Standards Track? NSID should be expand