Colleagues,
The new WGLC on draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion is now closed. The authors have
incorporated all the revisions requested by our AD and the WG, and we see
consensus to advance it for publication.
Thanks all for your feedback and patience.
Suzanne (for the chairs)
On May 7, 2024, at 1
Hi,
Thanks for resolving my comments.
Donald
===
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
d3e...@gmail.com
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 4:10 PM Wessels, Duane
wrote:
> Hi Donald,
>
> Thanks for the suggestions. We’v
Hi Donald,
Thanks for the suggestions. We’ve implemented all your suggested changes in
the source document. We’ll wait a few days for any more changes and then
publish a new revision.
DW
> On May 12, 2024, at 1:30 AM, Donald Eastlake wrote:
>
> Caution: This email originated from outside
Hi,
I support this draft but have the following comments:
I would assume this has been discussed before but, presumably, the purpose
of this document is to see that the zoneversion option will interoperate
between different implementations. So, why isn't it Standards Track?
NSID should be expand