Hi, I support this draft but have the following comments:
I would assume this has been discussed before but, presumably, the purpose of this document is to see that the zoneversion option will interoperate between different implementations. So, why isn't it Standards Track? NSID should be expanded on first use and a reference to RFC 5001 added. Section 2: The first line is sort of run-on at the end of the line. Suggest some more parentheses; OLD This document specifies a new EDNS(0) Section 6.1.2 of [RFC6891] NEW This document specifies a new EDNS(0) (Section 6.1.2 of [RFC6891]) Section 6: "In special for"? Maybe "In gratitude for"? or probably better yet "Special thanks for" Section 8: There are other ways to obtain trustworthiness. Suggest the following: OLD be necessary to use an encrypted and authenticated DNS transport. NEW be necessary to use an encrypted and authenticated DNS transport, TSIG [RFC8946], or SIG(0) [RFC2931]. Very minor: The RFC Editor understands "[this document]" and "TBD". All the current RFC Editor instructions in this draft are superfluous and could be deleted. Thanks, Donald =============================== Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA d3e...@gmail.com On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 10:25 PM Suzanne Woolf <swoolf= 40pir....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > Colleagues, > > > Back in October 2023, the WG requested publication of "The DNS Zone > Version (ZONEVERSION) Option" ( > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion/). > > When our AD reviewed it before taking it to IETF Last Call, he felt there > were some issues that needed to be addressed, and returned it to the WG. At > the time, the chairs asked the authors to address the comments, and told > the WG we'd run another WGLC before requesting publication again. > > The authors have addressed Warren's comments, so we're opening a 1-week > WGLC on the revised zoneversion document. Please review the new version and > speak up on the list to support advancing it or tell us where you think it > still needs work. > > We'll close the WGLC in one week, May 15. > > Current version: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion/ > Warren's AD review: > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/?q=%22AD%20Review%3A%20draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion%22 > Diff : > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion-05 > > > Thanks, > Suzanne (for the chairs) > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
