Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-child-syncronization-04.txt

2014-12-05 Thread Wes Hardaker
神明達哉 writes: > Looks good to me. Awesome, thanks! -- Wes Hardaker Parsons ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-child-syncronization-04.txt

2014-12-04 Thread 神明達哉
At Thu, 04 Dec 2014 13:41:05 -0800, Wes Hardaker wrote: > Ok, how about this: > >3. Query for the child zone's data records, as required by the CSYNC >record's Type Bit Map field > >* Note: if any of the resulting records being queried are not > authoritative withi

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-child-syncronization-04.txt

2014-12-04 Thread Wes Hardaker
神明達哉 writes: [... lots of agreement snipped; thanks! ...] >> 3. Query for the child zone's data records, as required by the CSYNC >> record's Type Bit Map field >> >> * Note: if any of the resulting records being queried are not >> authoritative within th

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-child-syncronization-04.txt

2014-12-02 Thread 神明達哉
At Mon, 01 Dec 2014 13:31:23 -0800, Wes Hardaker wrote: > > From a quick check some of them still seem to be open. And, as far as > > I remember there has been no response to my comments, so I'm not sure > > if they were considered/discussed but dismissed or simply overlooked. > > First, apologi

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-child-syncronization-04.txt

2014-12-02 Thread Wes Hardaker
Olafur Gudmundsson writes: >> WJH: I've put in a forward reference in the introduction. I'm >> not worried about the abstract as much, as any serious reader >> will likely read on anyway. And the point of the term was to >> make sure we don't say something confusing like "parent" when >> t

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-child-syncronization-04.txt

2014-12-01 Thread Olafur Gudmundsson
> On Dec 1, 2014, at 4:31 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote: > > 神明達哉 writes: > >> From a quick check some of them still seem to be open. And, as far as >> I remember there has been no response to my comments, so I'm not sure >> if they were considered/discussed but dismissed or simply overlooked. > >

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-child-syncronization-04.txt

2014-12-01 Thread Wes Hardaker
神明達哉 writes: > From a quick check some of them still seem to be open. And, as far as > I remember there has been no response to my comments, so I'm not sure > if they were considered/discussed but dismissed or simply overlooked. First, apologies again for missing these comments during last call

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-child-syncronization-04.txt

2014-12-01 Thread Wes Hardaker
神明達哉 writes: > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 4:52 PM, wrote: >> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >> directories. >> This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations Working >> Group of the IETF. >> >> Title : Child To Parent Sync

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-child-syncronization-04.txt

2014-11-27 Thread 神明達哉
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 4:52 PM, wrote: > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group > of the IETF. > > Title : Child To Parent Synchronization in DNS >

[DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-child-syncronization-04.txt

2014-11-26 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group of the IETF. Title : Child To Parent Synchronization in DNS Author : Wes Hardaker Filename