Olafur Gudmundsson <o...@ogud.com> writes: >> WJH: I've put in a forward reference in the introduction. I'm >> not worried about the abstract as much, as any serious reader >> will likely read on anyway. And the point of the term was to >> make sure we don't say something confusing like "parent" when >> there is more than one. There is no standard term, and the best >> that the WG came up with (thanks to Olafur) is the new term. >> But a forward reference in the introduction definitely makes >> sense. >> > See RFC7344 as definition of Parental Agent
It's already in there as a reference, and the definition in the sync draft is a copy of the 7344 text. The problem mentioned was that it's still not a "common" term. Though it's getting more and more common as we keep using it. -- Wes Hardaker Parsons _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
