On 2/11/2012 5:25 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On Feb 9, 2012, at 1:39 PM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
>
>> I think that starting work on such a draft is a great idea -BUT- in the mean
>> time
>> do not let "perfect" get in the way of "good enough".
> Just to be clear: a good handful of peop
On Feb 11, 2012, at 9:25 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On Feb 9, 2012, at 1:39 PM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
>> I think that starting work on such a draft is a great idea -BUT- in the
>> mean time
>> do not let "perfect" get in the way of "good enough".
>
> Just to be clear: a go
On Feb 9, 2012, at 1:39 PM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> I think that starting work on such a draft is a great idea -BUT- in the
> mean time
> do not let "perfect" get in the way of "good enough".
Just to be clear: a good handful of people, me included, have said that the
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 01:17:52PM -0800, Joe Abley wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> On 2012-02-06, at 14:12,
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks to Warren, Ed, John D., David C. and Kato-san for their
> > comments/corrections.
> > Any more?
>
> I see you added some text based on our conversation in sunny Christchu
Hi Bill,
On 2012-02-06, at 14:12,
wrote:
> Thanks to Warren, Ed, John D., David C. and Kato-san for their
> comments/corrections.
> Any more?
I see you added some text based on our conversation in sunny Christchurch,
thanks for that. As promised, here's a summary of that conversation for t
