On Feb 11, 2012, at 9:25 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > On Feb 9, 2012, at 1:39 PM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote: >> I think that starting work on such a draft is a great idea -BUT- in the >> mean time >> do not let "perfect" get in the way of "good enough". > > Just to be clear: a good handful of people, me included, have said that the > wording in the current doc is not good enough, or only good enough if you > squint hard. It is clearly much worse than the document that this is supposed > to replace.
To be honest, I'm unclear as to the point of the document. Could someone clarify? What exactly is revising 2870 supposed to do? Thanks, -drc _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
