[DNSOP] Re: [v6ops] Re: Call for Adoption: draft-buraglio-deprecate7050

I am in favor of adoption, it would be great to see more vendors implementing support for RFC8781, this draft clearly contributes to that goal. Tom Costello 630-252-0725 | tcoste...@anl.gov Argonne National Laboratory 9700 South Cass Avenue, Bldg. 240 Lemont, IL 604

[DNSOP] Re: [v6ops] Re: Call for Adoption: draft-buraglio-deprecate7050

While I support adoption, I think section 5.1 of RFC 8781 and this draft’s recommendation in section 4.2 need reconciliation. RFC 8781 section 5.1 already recommends using PCP-discover [RFC7225] PREF64 or the PREF64 RA Option over resolving PREF64 with an IPv4-only fully qualified domain lookup [R

[DNSOP] Re: [v6ops] Re: Call for Adoption: draft-buraglio-deprecate7050

I also support adoption! -Jeremy From: Chris Cummings Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:53 PM To: Tim Wicinski Cc: dnsop ; dnsop-chairs ; list Subject: [v6ops] Re: Call for Adoption: draft-buraglio-deprecate7050 [EXTERNAL] Verify links and attachments with sender. This looks great, I wo

[DNSOP] Re: [v6ops] Re: Call for Adoption: draft-buraglio-deprecate7050

This looks great, I would like to encourage adoption. Using PREF64 seems like the right route going forward, and anything we can do to encourage that seems like a win. — Chris Cummings On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 10:27 AM Tim Wicinski wrote: > All > > A followup on the Call For Adoption. We realize

[DNSOP] Re: [v6ops] Re: Call for Adoption: draft-buraglio-deprecate7050

I'm in favour of adoption. *--* Best Regards Daryll Swer Website: daryllswer.com On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 at 21:53, Tim Wicinski wrote: > All > > A followup on

[DNSOP] Re: Call for Adoption: draft-buraglio-deprecate7050

I’m in favor of adoption. Not sure if I responded previously. The document is too long for what it does, IMHO, but it’s the right idea and we can work on the length after adoption. Op wo 4 dec 2024 om 17:26 schreef Tim Wicinski > All > > A followup on the Call For Adoption. We realized we did n

[DNSOP] Re: Call for Adoption: draft-buraglio-deprecate7050

All A followup on the Call For Adoption. We realized we did not include v6ops in this call for adoption, but we are also have not heard from folks in the working group after the talk at the last IETF meeting. Once again, this is a call for adoption for "Deprecation of DNS64 for Discovery of IPv