I am in favor of adoption, it would be great to see more vendors implementing support for RFC8781, this draft clearly contributes to that goal.
Tom Costello 630-252-0725 | tcoste...@anl.gov<mailto:tcoste...@anl.gov> Argonne National Laboratory 9700 South Cass Avenue, Bldg. 240 Lemont, IL 60439-4871 ________________________________ From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 10:23 AM To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org> Cc: dnsop-chairs <dnsop-cha...@ietf.org>; list <v6...@ietf.org> Subject: [v6ops] Re: Call for Adoption: draft-buraglio-deprecate7050 All A followup on the Call For Adoption. We realized we did not include v6ops in this call for adoption, but we are also have not heard from folks in the working group after the talk at the last IETF meeting. Once again, this is a call for adoption ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside your organization. ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd All A followup on the Call For Adoption. We realized we did not include v6ops in this call for adoption, but we are also have not heard from folks in the working group after the talk at the last IETF meeting. Once again, this is a call for adoption for "Deprecation of DNS64 for Discovery of IPv6 Prefix Used for IPv6 Address Synthesis" The draft is available here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-buraglio-deprecate7050/<https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-buraglio-deprecate7050/__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!aEtpCH2pssca2FecwQFQyuwfA0dNKDfd-3ghjRlruWbrlcOPmxwQpJUjDnlfbuz6NsphnxAi3tJ3vbGCcA$> The chairs will take the silence as the group is not interested in working on this thanks tim On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 11:22 AM Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com<mailto:tjw.i...@gmail.com>> wrote: All During IETF121, there seemed to be some consensus to adopt this work in DNSOP. Here are the relevant minutes and link to the presentation from the session: Deprecation of DNS64 for Discovery of IPv6 Prefix Used for IPv6 Address Synthesis https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/121/materials/slides-121-dnsop-sessa-deprecation-of-dns64-for-discovery-of-ipv6-prefix-used-for-ipv6-address-synthesis-00<https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/121/materials/slides-121-dnsop-sessa-deprecation-of-dns64-for-discovery-of-ipv6-prefix-used-for-ipv6-address-synthesis-00__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!aEtpCH2pssca2FecwQFQyuwfA0dNKDfd-3ghjRlruWbrlcOPmxwQpJUjDnlfbuz6NsphnxAi3tK_pfJCRw$> Jen Linkova: 7050 won't work in multihoming Would like to see this adopted Lorenzo Colitti: Would like to do this Have you asked the mobile operators why they do this? Maybe not realistic Nick: Maybe say "non-mobile environments" Tommy: Will not update his earlier draft, this is a better draft Èric: Likes this Nick: Not saying remove the old ones Lorenzo: Talk to mobile operators, maybe drop the old stuff This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-buraglio-deprecate7050 "Deprecation of DNS64 for Discovery of IPv6 Prefix Used for IPv6 Address Synthesis" The draft is available here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-buraglio-deprecate7050/<https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-buraglio-deprecate7050/__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!aEtpCH2pssca2FecwQFQyuwfA0dNKDfd-3ghjRlruWbrlcOPmxwQpJUjDnlfbuz6NsphnxAi3tJ3vbGCcA$> Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by DNSOP, and send any comments to the list, clearly stating your view. Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc. Because of the American holiday next week, we are going to run this adoption call a little bit longer. This call for adoption ends: December 11, 2024 Thanks, For DNSOP co-chairs tim
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
