While I support adoption, I think section 5.1 of RFC 8781 and this draft’s recommendation in section 4.2 need reconciliation.
RFC 8781 section 5.1 already recommends using PCP-discover [RFC7225] PREF64 or the PREF64 RA Option over resolving PREF64 with an IPv4-only fully qualified domain lookup [RFC7050]. How is the recommendation in section 4.2 different than what is already in section 5.1 of RFC 8781? What should an implementation change to comply with this draft compared to RFC 8781 section 5.1? Should the text in section 5.1 of RFC 8781 get updated? Thanks On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 10:28 Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > All > > A followup on the Call For Adoption. We realized we did not include v6ops > in this call for adoption, but we are also have not heard from folks in the > working group after the talk at the last IETF meeting. > > Once again, this is a call for adoption for "Deprecation of DNS64 for > Discovery of IPv6 Prefix Used for IPv6 Address Synthesis" > > The draft is available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-buraglio-deprecate7050/ > > The chairs will take the silence as the group is not interested in working > on this > > thanks > tim > > > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 11:22 AM Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> All >> >> During IETF121, there seemed to be some consensus to adopt this work in >> DNSOP. >> Here are the relevant minutes and link to the presentation from the >> session: >> >> Deprecation of DNS64 for Discovery of IPv6 Prefix Used for IPv6 >> Address Synthesis >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/121/materials/slides-121-dnsop-sessa-deprecation-of-dns64-for-discovery-of-ipv6-prefix-used-for-ipv6-address-synthesis-00 >> >> Jen Linkova: 7050 won't work in multihoming >> Would like to see this adopted >> Lorenzo Colitti: Would like to do this >> Have you asked the mobile operators why they do this? >> Maybe not realistic >> Nick: Maybe say "non-mobile environments" >> Tommy: Will not update his earlier draft, this is a better draft >> Èric: Likes this >> Nick: Not saying remove the old ones >> Lorenzo: Talk to mobile operators, maybe drop the old stuff >> >> >> This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-buraglio-deprecate7050 >> "Deprecation of DNS64 for Discovery of IPv6 Prefix Used for IPv6 Address >> Synthesis" >> >> The draft is available here: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-buraglio-deprecate7050/ >> >> Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption >> by DNSOP, and send any comments to the list, clearly stating your view. >> >> Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc. >> >> Because of the American holiday next week, we are going to run this >> adoption call a little bit longer. >> >> This call for adoption ends: December 11, 2024 >> >> Thanks, >> For DNSOP co-chairs >> tim >> > _______________________________________________ > v6ops mailing list -- v6...@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to v6ops-le...@ietf.org =============================================== David Farmer Email:far...@umn.edu Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 =============================================== <v6ops-le...@ietf.org>
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
