[DNSOP]Re: Second (short) WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion

2024-05-17 Thread Suzanne Woolf
Colleagues, The new WGLC on draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion is now closed. The authors have incorporated all the revisions requested by our AD and the WG, and we see consensus to advance it for publication. Thanks all for your feedback and patience. Suzanne (for the chairs) On May 7, 2024, at 1

[DNSOP]Re: Paul Wouters' Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bootstrapping-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2024-05-17 Thread Peter Thomassen
Hi Paul, On 5/17/24 20:45, Paul Wouters wrote: # Section 2 OLD    The DS enrollment methods described in Section 3 of [RFC8078] are    deprecated and SHOULD NOT be used.  Child DNS operators and parental    agents who wish to use CDS/CDNSKEY records for initial DS enrollment    SHOULD instead s

[DNSOP]DELEG Chair Announcement.

2024-05-17 Thread Warren Kumari
[ Apologies for the wide distribution - I sent the original request to multiple WGs, and so figured this announcement should go to the same. ] Hi all, First, huge thanks to everyone who volunteered to serve as chairs for the (in the process of being chartered) DELEG WG. We had a large selection

[DNSOP]Re: Paul Wouters' Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bootstrapping-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2024-05-17 Thread Paul Wouters
On Fri, 17 May 2024, Peter Thomassen wrote: Proposed text: # Abstract OLD This document deprecates the DS enrollment methods described in Section 3 of RFC 8078 in favor of Section 4 of this document, and also updates RFC 7344. NEW This document establishes the DS enrollment method

[DNSOP]Re: Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bootstrapping-09: (with COMMENT)

2024-05-17 Thread Peter Thomassen
Hi Murray, On 5/16/24 12:59, Peter Thomassen wrote: I support Paul's DISCUSS especially with respect to Section 2.  It's peculiar to say a past process is obsolete and you SHOULD NOT use it, because then continuing to use it is technically still supported by this document.  Don't we want to say

[DNSOP]Re: Paul Wouters' Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bootstrapping-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2024-05-17 Thread Peter Thomassen
Hi Joe, On 5/17/24 10:39, jab...@strandkip.nl wrote: The Terminology section says: Signaling domain: A hostname from the child's NS RRset, prefixed with the label _signal. Defining a hostname with an alias containing the word "domain" does not prevent the confusion though (as in my cas

[DNSOP]Re: Paul Wouters' Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bootstrapping-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2024-05-17 Thread Peter Thomassen
Hi Paul, Thanks once more. Suggested changes and other comments below. Text edits can be previewed in this PR: https://github.com/desec-io/draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bootstrapping/pull/16/commits On 5/17/24 04:15, Paul Wouters wrote:  Section 2:   The DS enrollment methods described in

[DNSOP]Re: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bootstrapping-09: (with COMMENT)

2024-05-17 Thread Peter Thomassen
Hi Éric, Thank you for your comments. Associated changes will be included in revision -10, and can be previewed at https://github.com/desec-io/draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bootstrapping/pull/16/commits/e7bece2158440c5ed5b221fd8a312ac8f171. On 5/16/24 15:52, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker wrote: #

[DNSOP]Re: Paul Wouters' Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bootstrapping-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2024-05-17 Thread jabley
On May 17, 2024, at 04:15, Paul Wouters wrote: >>> Section 4.1.1: >>> >>> It is not clear to me if the "signaling domain" really has to be >>> its own zone or not. eg: >>> >>> _dsboot.example.co.uk._signal.ns1.example.net >>> >>> Could this be signed using the DNSKEY of "example.net", or does