Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space

2015-07-11 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , David Conrad writes: > > Mark, > > > It's like the judge said "I know porn when I see it." > > Potter Stewart's 1964 expression was thrown out in 1973 in favor of a > more objective standard (see the "Miller Test"). > > > Something are just subjective. > > Extreme corner cases may re

Re: [DNSOP] RFC 2181 - a pathway forward.

2015-07-11 Thread manning
thank you for your consideration. I know of substantive changes being worked on for four of the eight independent items collected in RFC 2181. I believe the other four items in RFC 2181 are unlikely to change. the one change i am working on is to obsolete RRsets since they are a primary cause

Re: [DNSOP] RFC 2181 - a pathway forward.

2015-07-11 Thread joel jaeggli
On 7/10/15 9:06 AM, Suzanne Woolf wrote: > Bill, > > On Jul 10, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Olafur Gudmundsson > wrote: > >> Question: What sections of 2181 do you see the need to update? > > This seems to be the critical question to your chairs and our AD as > well. > > If I understand it correctly, yo

Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space

2015-07-11 Thread David Conrad
Mark, > It's like the judge said "I know porn when I see it." Potter Stewart's 1964 expression was thrown out in 1973 in favor of a more objective standard (see the "Miller Test"). > Something are just subjective. Extreme corner cases may require subjective analysis. I believe the vast majori