In message <b93eb14f-e7e8-4e48-9660-19b9f00ed...@virtualized.org>, David Conrad writes: > > Mark, > > > It's like the judge said "I know porn when I see it." > > Potter Stewart's 1964 expression was thrown out in 1973 in favor of a > more objective standard (see the "Miller Test"). > > > Something are just subjective. > > Extreme corner cases may require subjective analysis. I believe the vast > majority of "special use" cases can be determined objectively, perhaps > with an appeals mechanism for the odd corner cases where the objective > analysis isn't clear cut. > > > This is why you have working groups not check lists for evaluating. > > RFC 6761 specifies an IETF "Standards Action" or "IESG Approval", not a > working group decision.
That why we have groups of people look at the request. Not a individual working off a checklist. Attempting to get this sort of assignment down to a simple checklist / objective measurements will not work. > Regards > -drc -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
