On 7/10/15 9:06 AM, Suzanne Woolf wrote: > Bill, > > On Jul 10, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Olafur Gudmundsson <o...@ogud.com> > wrote: > >> Question: What sections of 2181 do you see the need to update? > > This seems to be the critical question to your chairs and our AD as > well. > > If I understand it correctly, your proposed document roadmap has us > putting eight documents through the process as standards-track RFCs > with no change in substance from RFC 2181, so we can then put three > more documents through the process with new content. This seems like > a very process-heavy way to update 2181.
It does, Also there are 4035, 2535, 4343, 4033, 4034, 5452 which update respective portions of 2181 so breaking apart 2181 into individual pieces from the outset means incorporating those updates (fine I guess) but then you're operating on those drafts; or walking back those changes which I doubt is your intent. This is a foggy recollection but I'll recount it here, by way of communicating my own thoughts. When Bill asked me at nanog what I though of multiple 2181 changes. I proffered the opinion that. given that 2181 is several topics (7 I think) it would be best if each proposed update to a topic taken on in 2181 were to be a seperate draft so that could be discussed on their invidual merits rather than as a package of changes to 2181. 4343 and 5452 I would treat as precident for that. that is not a call imho for splitting appart 2181 first and then proposing changes. if I was interpreted at any time as proposing that I'm sorry. > It's also hard to commit to obsoleting 2181 in eight separate steps > without seeing the proposed updated content will be, or knowing > whether it will get to consensus. > > Could you describe the substance of what you think needs to be > changed? If the WG wants to do the work, we can manage the process > machinery accordingly. > > > thanks, Suzanne > > > > > > _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
