Re: [DNSOP] call to work on edns-client-subnet

2014-05-08 Thread Colm MacCárthaigh
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Ralf Weber wrote: > > There is madness, but the madness is in mixing authoritative and recursive > functions in one server and not in using DNS to direct traffic. That's a pretty big assumption to jump to. It's pretty unlikely that all ANAME implementors do that,

Re: [DNSOP] call to work on edns-client-subnet

2014-05-08 Thread Suzanne Woolf
On May 7, 2014, at 11:53 PM, Danny McPherson wrote: > > On May 7, 2014, at 1:13 PM, Suzanne Woolf wrote: > >> This sounds to me like a) support for working on edns-client-subnet (and >> possibly things like it in the future), with b) a resulting RFC as >> "Informational". >> >> I've found

Re: [DNSOP] call to work on edns-client-subnet

2014-05-08 Thread Christopher Morrow
#1 - support doing the work to finalize the edns-client-subnet standard. now... (I hope my inline response is accepted by the readers of this wg's list, I would note that someone's quoting is all jacked up... oh well) On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Paul Vixie wrote: > > > Ralf Weber wrote: >

Re: [DNSOP] call to work on edns-client-subnet

2014-05-08 Thread Paul Vixie
Ralf Weber wrote: > ... > There is madness, but the madness is in mixing authoritative and recursive > functions in one server and not in using DNS to direct traffic. while i'm on record has holding that view, it turns out that RFC 1035 does describe recursion and authority as co-residing in a

Re: [DNSOP] call to work on edns-client-subnet

2014-05-08 Thread Ralf Weber
Moin! On 08 May 2014, at 17:47, Paul Vixie wrote: > Tony Finch wrote: >> Barry Margolin pointed out an amusing interaction between two stupid DNS >> tricks on the bind-users list: >> https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/2014-May/093171.html >> >> If you have an authoritative server with "A

Re: [DNSOP] call to work on edns-client-subnet

2014-05-08 Thread Paul Vixie
Tony Finch wrote: > Barry Margolin pointed out an amusing interaction between two stupid DNS > tricks on the bind-users list: > https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/2014-May/093171.html > > If you have an authoritative server with "ANAME" or "CNAME flattening" > support, and the target of t

Re: [DNSOP] call to work on edns-client-subnet

2014-05-08 Thread Tony Finch
Barry Margolin pointed out an amusing interaction between two stupid DNS tricks on the bind-users list: https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/2014-May/093171.html If you have an authoritative server with "ANAME" or "CNAME flattening" support, and the target of the ANAME is a CDN that does sou