#1 - support doing the work to finalize the edns-client-subnet standard.

now... (I hope my inline response is accepted by the readers of this
wg's list, I would note that someone's quoting is all jacked up... oh
well)

<pull up waders>

On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Paul Vixie <p...@redbarn.org> wrote:
>
>
> Ralf Weber wrote:
>
> ...
>
> There is madness, but the madness is in mixing authoritative and recursive
> functions in one server and not in using DNS to direct traffic.
>

It seems, to me at least, that a bunch of the problems with dns
'tricks' which are more than: "Oh good, my zone loads! Lookey, I have
an A record! what is an A record again?"

are that folk should not play with sharp knives if they aren't
prepared to get cut occasionally. Ideally you understand the
implications of tricks like:
  bind views
  dns anycast
  edns-client-subnet
  etc

before you deploy them... That's all beside the point of good
documentation being available to support inter-operability between
vendor code for these features though. Should the IETF mint a standard
for 'feature-X' in the software system that makes up the DNS? Where's
the bar used to measure whether or not a feature has critical enough
mass/interest to be written up? Should all feature ideas get adopted
and then those which prove to wither be permitted to die out before
WGLC?

>
> while i'm on record has holding that view, it turns out that RFC 1035 does
> describe recursion and authority as co-residing in a server. so while this
> is in my view a dangerous practice and a bad idea, it's well supported by
> the scriptures.
>
>
> After all that's what all lookups do, give you an IP address you connect to.
>
>
> i don't think so. dns lookups have many purposes unrelated to returning IP
> addresses. i'd like to see 100 more things like SSHFP this decade.

ah, so you seem to be in the camp of 'let a thousand flowers bloom' or
whatever... that seems like fun as well. Back on topic though, should
the edns-client-subnet work get attention and potentially move forward
in this WG?

-chris

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to