As mentioned in the session today, the Enumservices Guide contains some
text on DNS Considerations in section 5.7:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-guide
The original reason for this text was the "unused" Enumservice, which
conveyed assumptions about the DNS space "below"
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Peter Koch wrote:
> Dean,
>
> > So root and gTLD DNS server operations supervision is off the charter?
>
> to the extent that is has never been there, yes.
>
> > It used to be the first item. This appears to affect ISOC IETF
> > commitments to ICANN to provide this techn
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> On 11-Mar-2008, at 10:37, Dean Anderson wrote:
>
> > So root and gTLD DNS server operations supervision is off the charter?
>
> I'm not sure it was ever on the charter.
>
> The paragraph you quoted seems to suggest that the attention of the
> worki
On 11-Mar-2008, at 10:37, Dean Anderson wrote:
> So root and gTLD DNS server operations supervision is off the charter?
I'm not sure it was ever on the charter.
It is in the current charter ...
jaap
___
DNSOP mailing
Dear colleagues,
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:53:54AM -0400, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> The paragraph you quoted seems to suggest that the attention of the
> working group is equally-focussed on root, TLD and all other
> nameservers, whether authority-only servers or not.
While that's true, the olde
Dean,
> So root and gTLD DNS server operations supervision is off the charter?
to the extent that is has never been there, yes.
> It used to be the first item. This appears to affect ISOC IETF
> commitments to ICANN to provide this technical role.
If you could support this observation by tan
On 11-Mar-2008, at 10:37, Dean Anderson wrote:
> So root and gTLD DNS server operations supervision is off the charter?
I'm not sure it was ever on the charter.
The paragraph you quoted seems to suggest that the attention of the
working group is equally-focussed on root, TLD and all other
n
So root and gTLD DNS server operations supervision is off the charter?
It used to be the first item. This appears to affect ISOC IETF
commitments to ICANN to provide this technical role.
I'm not certain I'm against that--I just want to clarify that this isn't
an oversight.
1. Define the proces
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 04:05:14AM +0100,
Peter Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 57 lines which said:
> 7) establish terminology and methodology for performance measurements
>of servers, resolvers or the service as such.
Warning: for other protocols, this work is apparently done
