Ah, great! I did not look back enough into history it seems.
On 23. 01. 25 13:19, Nicolas Cavallari wrote:
On 23/01/2025 12:29, Petr Menšík wrote:
Hello everyone!
Fedora just changed to gcc 15 in upcoming Fedora 42. And it seems
dnsmasq is not able to compile [1][2] with the new compiler
Hello everyone!
Fedora just changed to gcc 15 in upcoming Fedora 42. And it seems
dnsmasq is not able to compile [1][2] with the new compiler, like it
could before. Example error is:
dhcp.c: In function ‘dhcp_packet’:
dhcp.c:320:49: error: passing argument 3 of ‘iface_enumerate’ from incompat
It seems I won't be there this year. Planning remote attendance only.
On 10. 01. 25 14:15, Geert Stappers wrote:
Hi,
What about a face to face meeting during FOSDEM2025?
https://fosdem.org/2025/
Groeten
Geert Stappers
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mai
information in the empty trailing lines, say so. Expressing
other possible reasons for keeping the empty lines is also good.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, https://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
here
are any questions or concerns left, i’m more than happy to help.
More readings (if interested) about this can be found here:
- http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/the-biggest-myths (point 3 mentions
socket activation)
- http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/socket-activated-containers.html
Thank you
mi
!config_find_by_address(daemon->dhcp_conf, addr))
{
/* in consec-ip mode, skip addresses equal to
the number of addresses rejected by clients. This
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, https://ww
the number of addresses rejected by clients. This
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, https://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.
{
> - log_query(F_UPSTREAM, NULL, NULL, "truncated", 0);
> - header->ancount = htons(0);
> - header->nscount = htons(0);
> - header->arcount = htons(0);
> - }
>
> if (!(header->hb3 & HB3_TC) && (!bogusanswer || (hea
ferred_lft forever
I guess it is most likely be down to the setup on the clients
(openSUSE). But as I plan to roll a lot af clients, I would like to be
able to keep the default setup. And when I was using the build in DNS
in pfSense I had no problems like that.
Any ideas?
--
Petr Menšík
C directly. It would get understood right away.
PS: consider the same license as the project for them.
Cheers,
Petr
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, http://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
mkswig.sh
Description: application/shellscript
#!/usr/bin
works will improve its
performance. It should work on every sane network. Consider lowering
timeout and increasing attempts. options timeout:3 attempts:3 or
timeout:2 attempts:4 might work better. Dnsmasq retries are driven by
external clients, caching should reduce issues with it when network
13:44:46 CET 2024
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 90
Regards,
Tijs Van Buggenhout
_______
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
--
Petr Menšík
Software
Hi!
As part of our review of dnsmasq code, our code scanning tools revealed
few warnings. Some of them are valid, although it does fix only more or
less cosmetic fixes. Potentially emitting warnings in tools like
Coverity scan. 3 small changes attached.
Cheers,
Petr
--
Petr Menšík
Software
if dnsmasq can be installed and configured as a full-fledged
authoritative DNS Server?
Regards,
Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
Targeted Individual in Singapore
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, https://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
option seems not to be working with domains defined in the addn-hosts
files.
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
--
Petr Menšík
Software
ted" dnsmasq log message anymore.
I can not judge if client should do anything else in this case thou..
Adam Pribyl
On Tue, 12 Mar 2024, Petr Menšík wrote:
The response seems correct and acceptable in size. It should not
truncate, at least what I see. It should also retry with TCP when
ing support for this protocol in dnsmasq? Or other
solutions?
Cheers,
Ronan
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
--
Petr Menšík
Software En
updated I want dnsmasq to notice any changes in the
file.
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, http://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https
Thanks folks and have a good Easter Monday.
M
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, h
ss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, https://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
___
Dnsmasq-discu
I know this is a slightly non-standard configuration but it has worked
very nicely for me for some years. Can anyone suggest a way to fix
this? Obviously /run/NetworkManager/no-stub-resolv.conf is created
at every boot so the permissions will revert to 'too strict' every
time I start th
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, http://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
t specified in DNS to provide all answers known. If
anyone relies on it, that would be wrong too.
I disagree with current proposal.
On 06. 02. 24 18:00, Dominik Derigs via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
RFC 8482
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat,http://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908D
, but
customization can be done just by make COPTS='-DHAVE_LUASCRIPT' LUA=lua.
Cheers,
Petr
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, https://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
From 2de2259472d64d36221bd7ab0efe03f4501f8620 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From:
nless anyone has an objection.
Simon.
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, https://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
OpenPGP_0x4931CA5B6C9FC5CB.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital sign
Sending update of HTTPS and SVCB dns records. There is still no
straightforward way to serve such records from dnsmasq (except
--dns-rr), but at least update reference to final RFC it were assigned
to it.
Happy new year everyone!
Cheers,
Petr
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat
could find clearer notation, I would be glad.
Happy new year!
1.
https://forum.openwrt.org/t/resolving-query-type-65-to-local-address-for-ios-clients-in-dnsmasq/179504
Cheers,
Petr
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, https://www.redhat.com/
PGP
will allow.
Is anyone involved planning to be there as well?
https://fosdem.org/2024/schedule/track/dns/
Cheers,
Petr
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, https://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
OpenPGP_0x4931CA5B6C9FC5CB.asc
Description: OpenPGP
l network are not supposed to be visible from the Internet.
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
g.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2021q4/015749.html
2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1852373
3. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-9516
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, https://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
ding /etc/resolv.conf
> dnsmasq: using nameserver 9.9.9.9#53
> dnsmasq: using nameserver 10.96.0.10#53 for domain svc.cluster.local
> dnsmasq: ignoring nameserver 127.0.0.1 - local interface
> dnsmasq: read /etc/hosts - 7 names
> dnsmasq: query[A] perdu.com <http://perdu.co
temd can provide autorecovery with smart settings. Do we
have a way to specify I do not require TCP listening socket for DNS? It
should be clearly discouraged, but for some kinds of tests it might be
acceptable.
Cheers,
Petr
On 23/11/2023 11:13, Petr Menšík wrote:
To fix problem with multiple
4 server=8.8.8.8
auth-server=server.home.mydomain.com
<http://server.home.mydomain.com>,enp2s0f0 auth-zone=home.mydomain.com
<http://home.mydomain.com>,192.168.1.0/24
host-record=server.home.mydomain.com,192.168.1.50
<http://192.168.1.0/24 host-record=server.home.mydomain.c
ERBIND) || errno == EADDRINUSE)
die(s, daemon->addrbuff, EC_BADNET);
}
else
Cheers,
Simon.
On 22/11/2023 19:27, Petr Menšík wrote:
Hello everyone,
I have received error report RHEL-16398 [1], which I think makes
sense to fix even in the lastest version. I believe i
fatal the same way as with --bind-interfaces.
Would you find any other errors, which should be hidden or made fatal?
What would you think of those changes?
1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-16398
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, http://www.redhat.com/
PGP
ut we are still
far from that.
Thanks,
Evgeny
Cheers,
Petr
1. https://github.com/InfrastructureServices/dnsconfd
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat,http://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
OpenPGP_0x4931CA5B6C9FC5CB.asc
Description: OpenPGP public k
e kindly let me know what you think.
Kind regards,
Damian Sawicki
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHE
enumerate_interfaces(0); call in this case as well.
I have created for it bug #2247269 [1] for tracking this.
1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247269
On 16. 10. 23 15:02, Petr Menšík wrote:
Hello everyone.
Today I have returned to work, where I am running dnsmasq 2.89 on my
Fedora
this. I
wonder whether it would make sense to call it explicitly after
local_bind failure. Because full journal I do not have details about
interface changes anymore:
journalctl -xeu NetworkManager | grep 'failed to bind server socket to
enp9s0u1' |
page somewhere but I can't find it.
If dnsmasq is to listen on more than one address how do you put this
in the configuration file?
I.e. is it:-
listen-address=192.168.1.2,127.0.0.1
or is it:-
listen-address=192.168.1.2
listen-address=127.0.0.1
Or will either work?
--
P
Green wrote:
On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 11:58:38PM +0200, Petr Menšík wrote:
I think you have failed to show us what is in /etc/resolv.conf on the
machine, which is running host command.
It's specified in /etc/dnsmasq.conf:-
resolv-file=/run/NetworkManager/no-stub-resolv.
all. The /etc/default/dnsmasq
file just has:-
ENABLED=1
CONFIG_DIR=/etc/dnsmasq.d,.dpkg-dist,.dpkg-old,.dpkg-new
So why do I get that timeout error from the 'host' coommand? It's as
if dnsmasq on the local machine isn't listening on 127.0.0.1. Does it
only listen
_
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat,http://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
__
s still working for a Chromecast
and Nest Audio, but not the Android phones.
This isn't a good solution, but it's the best I've come up with.
Simon.
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, https://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7
e the
reason?
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat,http://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/lis
1
dnsmasq: 147 127.0.0.1/53500 DHCP mediapi is 192.168.10.203
dnsmasq: 171 127.0.0.1/56905 query[A] proxy from 127.0.0.1
dnsmasq: 171 127.0.0.1/56905 config proxy is NODATA-IPv4
How do I get the static IP hosts to be resolved?
This used to work, and I'm not sure what's changed.
--
Petr
like to have some names for
all connected devices in my network, without a need to register them
manually.
1.
https://www.iana.org/assignments/icmpv6-parameters/icmpv6-parameters.xhtml#icmpv6-parameters-5
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat,http
dress
to about 8 seconds, which is mouch more sensible.
Simon.
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, http://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.o
.
( Reply-To: is set to accomodate that )
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 12:42:24PM +0200, Petr Menšík wrote:
On 5/3/23 06:23, shashikumar Shashi wrote:
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 4:05 AM Simon Kelley wrote:
Thanks for the report. I've just pushed a code change which improves
the checki
Petr
1.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Y4FBSNAO2NRWB3YAY6YWE5767ORZRSOY/
2. https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2136
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, http://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4
istinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat,https://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/m
Did just a basic testing, but those changes improve tested situation.
What do you think about it?
Cheers,
Petr
On 26. 05. 23 18:19, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 25/05/2023 20:32, Petr Menšík wrote:
This problem is best tested by an example, taken from [2] but a bit
modified.
Let's create he
Florian Baaske via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
Hi Pert,
thanks for the help. Much appreciated.
I found something in regards to ISC as the DHCP server and thought
that DNSMASQ might have the same feature.
BR
Florian
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 12:26 PM Petr Menšík <mailto:pemen...@redhat.com>
appreciated.
BR
Florian
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat,https://www.redhat.com/
PGP
uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss>
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
___
Dn
is problem?
Cheers,
Petr
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160466#c6
[3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160466#c13
On 19. 05. 23 13:40, Petr Menšík wrote:
When analysing report [1] for non-responding queries over TCP, I have
found forwarded TCP connections have quite high timeo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160466
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, http://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
From c02cfcb0a358e04636ffd2bcc595860b25b3a440 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20Men=C5=A1=C3=ADk?=
Date: Wed, 17 May 20
scuss
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat,https://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160466
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, http://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
From c02cfcb0a358e04636ffd2bcc595860b25b3a440 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20Men=C5=A1=C3=ADk?=
Date: Wed, 17 May 20
Message-
From: Dominik Derigs
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 11:40 AM
To: Petr Menšík ;
dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk; B@us
Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Filtering non-latin1 or non-ASCIII dns
requests?
Hey Burton and Petr,
On Wed, 2023-05-10 at 21:12 -0500, B@us wrote:
> doma
api.example.com=valid_address
example.com=hijack_address
See manual page for actual syntax.
Karma bonus points for sharing what works.
Regards
Monthly Posting
--
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2023q2/017067.html
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, https://www.
way to translate domains that don’t match
\.[A-Za-z0-9]\. to 127.0.0.1?
Thanks!
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat,https://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss
which looks a lot like the letter “a”.
Is there an easy way to translate domains that don’t match
\.[A-Za-z0-9]\. to 127.0.0.1?
Thanks!
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat,https://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9
cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, http://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys
On 17. 04. 23 15:57, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 17/04/2023 01:10, Petr Menšík wrote:
I do not understand why should be proxy-dnssec caching unreliable. It
should be as simple as storing AD bit from the reply in cache entry.
I expect just extra bit is something we can afford.
I explained this
sidering my question.
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, http://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E5299
?id=2185878
Cheers,
Petr
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, https://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
From 7abc1f58988b1f299ce1dd008c48890314f3581b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20Men=C5=A1=C3=ADk?=
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 14:31:22 +0200
Subj
machine always provide the correct
status (SECURE), while site visits, using a browser provide
inconsistent statuses (SECURE / INSECURE) I assume dig replies are
also cached...
Again, thank you both for your interest in this, your valuable time
and effort.
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red H
>
> ___
> Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
> Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
> <mailto:Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk>
>
https://lists
leys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
on this! I already
started testing (using the long command above) and will
report any oddities I come across.
Best,
Dominik
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, https://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
___
Dns
n Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 1:15 PM Kurt Fitzner via Dnsmasq-discuss
wrote:
Is there a way to have dnsmasq support the use of IP addresses in
nftset
directives? I cannot get it to work, though I can't see any reason why
it shouldn't.
Thanks.
Kurt Fitzner
--
Petr Menšík
Software En
om/192.168.2.50
# address=/www.stillanotherdomain.ch/192.168.2.50
# address=/stillanotherdomain.ch/192.168.2.50
I am not very experienced with DNS servers, so can you possible point
me in the right direction if you see an error.
Thanks
Paul
--
Petr
asking on dnsop for opinions would not hurt.
Cheers,
Petr
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, https://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.the
ret_err(gen_err);
+
+ if (!lastdomain || cur_domain == lastdomain)
+ break;
+
+ cur_domain += strlen(cur_domain) + 1;
+ }
+ }
+ else while ((flags & SERV_LITERAL_ADDRESS) ||
parse_server_next(&sdetails))
{
g you. Patch looks fine. Applied to git repo.
Cheers,
Simon.
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, https://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
G1pokOFOOhlYQQHhglgfu6
mgNJnFrHUs3M+JNBNyAay42aSSDt5gXcvk77nx32uWv40pfknU7wH2Xc rP4=
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-structured-dns-error/
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, http://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
From acb66a570a5e338a79160a8dd2b9e072ab8c5a81 Mon Sep 1
on been rejected already? (I'm
happy to send a patch if
not?)
Thanks
Ed W
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
--
Petr Menšík
Software
list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, http://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing
b39
2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178069
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat,http://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
From 198f1971d80692582eb3206632873295ea725556 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20Men=C5=A1=C3=ADk?=
Date: Tue, 1
/raw/
~J
--
//
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat,https://www.redhat.com/
PGP
ft
status but it's used in the wild rather frequently.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Glossary/https_rr
https://blog.cloudflare.com/speeding-up-https-and-http-3-negotiation-with-dns/
Best,
Dan
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, http://www.
forward to meet anyone.
Cheers,
Petr
[1] https://fosdem.org/2023/
[2] https://fosdem.org/2023/schedule/track/dns/
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, https://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
___
Dnsmasq-discuss
the need for recompiling.
I wish you some nice and hopefully relaxing Christmas days!
Best regards,
Dominik
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
d to .
A key pair can be specified when creating VM on cloud, but I can not
ask every tester add my ssh key pair when creating VM.
Petr Menšík 于2022年11月25日 周五19:52写道：
Did you know that dnsmasq registers all hosts by their name, if
they send their own hostname when requesting DHCP
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, https://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
From 1a6eba5f3972efe31f1a03d33
discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, https://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
From 11fe9dd86740865ebd6911a3a2ccdaa6b943d043 Mon
_
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat,https://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
__
asq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/l
doubt we can make reasonable
filter on dnsmasq side.
On 19. 11. 22 0:12, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 11:15:08AM +0800, zhangjiangyu via Dnsmasq-discuss
wrote:
Hi，
On Mon, Nov 15, 2022 at 8:15:00PM +0800, Petr Menšík wrote:
Interesting tests.
But dnsmasq is
course in this case my
previous patch is not needed for anything, because yours fixes it in a
better way. Just take a look at this patch.
Thanks!
Petr
On 11/16/22 18:23, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 10/11/2022 17:02, Petr Menšík wrote:
Hi!
I were testing my builds on rootcanary.org test, where
s can rely on forwarder's checks.
Regards,
Petr
[1] https://linux.die.net/man/1/ldns-testns
On 11/12/22 03:30, ZhangJiangyu 张江瑜 via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
The rcode of the dnsmasq returned
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, https://www.
Oh, I think that were just typo when editing that file. Of course
shouln't be there.
Attached fixed patch.
On 11/13/22 14:44, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 06:02:44PM +0100, Petr Menšík wrote:
Hi!
I were testing my builds on rootcanary.org test,
implementations return already insecure status - not
implemented algorithm. This change makes the same for dnsmasq.
Opinions on that?
Cheers,
Petr
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, http://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
From
/rpms/dnsmasq/-/blob/c9s/dnsmasq-2.86-dhcpv6-client-arch.patch
3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2002871
4. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1998448
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, http://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
Ah, found reference to the original thread:
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2021q3/015640.html
It has subject: [PATCH] DHCPv6 - network booting 'address in use'
It was neither refused or merged, so I like it to be reviewed.
On 10/21/22 12:25, Petr Menšík
I would suggest upgrading to CentOS 8 if possible. That version has
already DNSSEC support built-in.
If not possible, consider rebuilding CentOS 8 or CentOS 9 dnsmasq
package from source. Another way might be just adding
COPTS+=-DHAVE_DNSSEC to rhel7 srpm and rebuild. Using rpm-build -bb
*.sp
enough.
It might also slightly improve performance handling sockets, because it
reduces copying done on socket listener adding.
Just improvement without adding any other feature.
Cheers,
Petr
--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, http://www.redhat.com/
PGP
On 17. 07. 22 14:35, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
Previous-Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Create temporary leases for
DHCPOFFER actions
In-Reply-To:
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 10:54:28PM +0200, Petr Menšík wrote:
On 7/13/22 19:20, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote
possible mark them merged automagically.
But haven't found enough free time to play with that. Sort of external
pull requests, which can be linked to bugs and tracked progress, if any.
On 7/13/22 19:20, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 10:26:35PM +0200, Petr M
1 - 100 of 320 matches
Mail list logo
