On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 09:15:03AM +0700, Bino Oetomo wrote:
> Dear All
>
> On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 6:26 PM Nicolas Cavallari wrote:
>
> > Let's look at the reply from freeradius:
> >
> > > (14) Sent code 1026 Id 24307805 from 10.10.254.1:67 to 10.10.253.1:67
> > > length 0
> > > (14) DHCP-Rela
Dear Geert Stappers
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 4:31 PM Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss <
dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk> wrote:
>
>
> OK, it got implemented well.
>
>
> with your helps
>
> > > --
> > > Silence is hard to parse
> > >
> > >
> > Thankyou Geert Stappers,
> > I really really
Dear All
After I do what Nicolas Cavallari told me to do, It works smooth.
Since my FreeRadius installation is sourcing all reply attribute from my
rest service, I made my rest to:
1. Give the right broadcast address DHCP option.
2. Give the right Server Identifier DHCP option.
Point #2 also fix
On 20/06/2021 20:58, Jesus M Diaz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Let me explain the scenario:
>
> - I have a number of computers acquiring IP-address by DHCP and I have
> dnsmasq configured with static leases for specific mac-addresses.
> - I also have a couple of virtual computers for very specific purpo
On 27.06.21, 22:56, "Simon Kelley" wrote:
> I've committed 8a1ef367e27e570cac40d3b09920a4a60c5f7e0b which has the
> same effect as your patch, but modifies the ubus code, and contains a
> note that this needs to be looked at by someone who knows. It
> more-or-less restores the status-quo ante,
On 27/06/2021 20:19, Etan Kissling wrote:
>
>
> On 27.06.21, 19:48, "Simon Kelley" wrote:
>
>> My change made the ubus code work in the same way as DBus. It expects
>> that ubus_init() will return a non-NULL error report if something
>> unexpected and nasty happened. (maybe a configuration that
On 27.06.21, 19:48, "Simon Kelley" wrote:
> My change made the ubus code work in the same way as DBus. It expects
> that ubus_init() will return a non-NULL error report if something
> unexpected and nasty happened. (maybe a configuration that can never
> work.) If the Ubus connection cannot be
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 2:12 PM wrote:
> On 6/27/21 1:01 PM, Carl Karsten wrote:
> > If I do not have access to the venue network, then my networking needs
> are just
> > my 2 devices. This is the case I am trying to provide for, without
> having to edit
> > a config file. the Opsis PC is ofte
On 6/27/21 1:01 PM, Carl Karsten wrote:
If I do not have access to the venue network, then my networking needs are just
my 2 devices. This is the case I am trying to provide for, without having to edit
a config file. the Opsis PC is often headless, so editing is done via ssh from
the voctomi
On 27/06/2021 00:22, Etan Kissling wrote:
> When using multiple dnsmasq instances Ubus only connects on one of them.
> Since 3c93e8eb41952a9c91699386132d6fe83050e9be dnsmasq crashes instead.
> This change avoids the crash, leading to a graceful retry + error log.
>
> Signed-off-by: Etan Kissling
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 10:49 AM Andrew Miskell
wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 27, 2021, at 09:30, Carl Karsten wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 7:56 AM john doe wrote:
>
>> On 6/27/2021 9:17 AM, Carl Karsten wrote:
>> > On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 2:10 AM john doe wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 6/27/2021 7:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 10:48:56AM -0500, Andrew Miskell via Dnsmasq-discuss
wrote:
> On Jun 27, 2021, at 09:30, Carl Karsten wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 7:56 AM john doe wrote:
> >> On 6/27/2021 9:17 AM, Carl Karsten wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 2:10 AM john doe wrote:
> >> >>
> On Jun 27, 2021, at 12:02, Carl Karsten wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 10:49 AM Andrew Miskell
>> wrote:
>>
>>
On Jun 27, 2021, at 09:30, Carl Karsten wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 7:56 AM john doe wrote:
On 6/27/2021 9:17 AM, Carl Ka
> On Jun 27, 2021, at 09:30, Carl Karsten wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 7:56 AM john doe wrote:
>> On 6/27/2021 9:17 AM, Carl Karsten wrote:
>> > On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 2:10 AM john doe wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 6/27/2021 7:03 AM, Dominik wrote:
>> >>> Hey Carl,
>> >>>
>> >>> On S
On 6/27/2021 3:53 PM, Carl Karsten wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 7:56 AM john doe wrote:
On 6/27/2021 9:17 AM, Carl Karsten wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 2:10 AM john doe wrote:
On 6/27/2021 7:03 AM, Dominik wrote:
Hey Carl,
On Sat, 2021-06-26 at 19:16 -0500, Carl Karsten wrote:
I'm l
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 7:56 AM john doe wrote:
> On 6/27/2021 9:17 AM, Carl Karsten wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 2:10 AM john doe wrote:
> >
> >> On 6/27/2021 7:03 AM, Dominik wrote:
> >>> Hey Carl,
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, 2021-06-26 at 19:16 -0500, Carl Karsten wrote:
> I'm looking for
On 6/27/2021 9:17 AM, Carl Karsten wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 2:10 AM john doe wrote:
On 6/27/2021 7:03 AM, Dominik wrote:
Hey Carl,
On Sat, 2021-06-26 at 19:16 -0500, Carl Karsten wrote:
I'm looking for advice on haveing some boxes to have both dynamic and
static IPs.
Why use a stati
Hey Simon,
I tried your recent extended DNS errors (EDE) addition. I tested the
following well-know DNSSEC testing domains:
- dnssec-failed.org: "BOGUS (EDE: DNSKEY missing)"
- rhybar.cz: "BOGUS (EDE: DNSSEC signature expired)"
- sigfail.verteiltesysteme.net: "BOGUS"
Interestingly, sigfail.verte
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 03:06:14PM +0700, Bino Oetomo wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 12:03 AM Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 02:58:16PM +0700, Bino Oetomo wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 1:24 PM Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 09:55:01AM +0700, Bino O
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 02:17:20AM -0500, Carl Karsten wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 2:10 AM john doe wrote:
> > On 6/27/2021 7:03 AM, Dominik wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2021-06-26 at 19:16 -0500, Carl Karsten wrote:
> > >> I'm looking for advice on haveing some boxes to have both dynamic and
> > >>
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 12:03 AM Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss <
dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 02:58:16PM +0700, Bino Oetomo wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 1:24 PM Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 09:55:01AM +0700, Bino Oetomo
> These machines are portable.
[0]
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 01:26:24AM -0500, Carl Karsten wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 12:03 AM Dominik wrote:
>
> > Hey Carl,
> >
> > On Sat, 2021-06-26 at 19:16 -0500, Carl Karsten wrote:
> > > I'm looking for advice on haveing some boxes to have both dyna
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 2:10 AM john doe wrote:
> On 6/27/2021 7:03 AM, Dominik wrote:
> > Hey Carl,
> >
> > On Sat, 2021-06-26 at 19:16 -0500, Carl Karsten wrote:
> >> I'm looking for advice on haveing some boxes to have both dynamic and
> >> static IPs.
> >
> > Why use a static IP at all? We ha
On 6/27/2021 7:03 AM, Dominik wrote:
Hey Carl,
On Sat, 2021-06-26 at 19:16 -0500, Carl Karsten wrote:
I'm looking for advice on haveing some boxes to have both dynamic and
static IPs.
Why use a static IP at all? We have often enough seen people use static
addresses for the wrong reasons.
A
These machines are portable. they will likely start out on a lan where I
control the dhcp server; the os apps and config are setup, then they are
moved to another room. They live there for a few days to a week, and then
are put back in storage, with a few being left out for R&D to experiment
wit
25 matches
Mail list logo
