On 27.06.21, 22:56, "Simon Kelley" <si...@thekelleys.org.uk> wrote:

> I've committed 8a1ef367e27e570cac40d3b09920a4a60c5f7e0b which has the
> same effect as your patch, but modifies the ubus code, and contains a
> note that this needs to be looked at by someone who knows. It
> more-or-less restores the status-quo ante, which helps the immediate
> problem. In looking at the the long term fix, please submit or cause to
> be submitted, better patches if they exist.

Thanks for this. While this is indeed more like fixing "symptoms" it
still gives more time to find better solutions on the client side.

> It might be worth pointing out that you can change the instance name
>
> --enable-ubus=dnsmasq-2
>
> if that helps.

This is very useful.

Thanks!

Etan


_______________________________________________
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss

Reply via email to